Case Study 1: Sara is a 45-year-old female presenting for her annual exam. Her blood pressure today is 160/90 HR 84 RR 16. Her height is 64 inches and her weight is 195. Her last visit to the clinic 3 months ago shows a BP of 156/92. She is currently taking ibuprofen 600 mg tid for back pain. She has no known allergies. What is the goal for her blood pressure? What medication would you prescribe to treat her blood pressure? What education would you prescribe? Case Study 2: Monty is a 52-year-old male following up on his labs that were drawn last week. He smokes 1 pack per day. He is currently on Lisinopril 20 mg po daily. He is allergic to penicillin. Fasting lipid profile shows total cholesterol 266, LDL cholesterol 180, HDL cholesterol 40, and Triglycerides 185. What treatment plan would you implement for Monty’s lipid profile? What is the goal Total Cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, and LDL-C level for Monty? How would you monitor the effectiveness of your treatment plan? How many risk factors for coronary artery disease does this patient have? Identify them specifically. Case Study 3: Beatrice is a 17-year-old female diagnosed with mild persistent asthma since age 7. During her visit today, she reports having to use her albuterol MDI 3 to 4 days per week over the past 2 months. Over the past week she has been using albuterol at least once per day. She reports being awakened by a cough three nights during the last month. She is becoming more short of breath with exercise. She also has a fluticasone MDI, which she uses “most days of the week.” Her current medications include: Flovent HFA 44 mcg, two puffs BID, Proventil HFA two puffs Q 4–6 H PRN shortness of breath, Yaz one PO daily, Propranolol 80 mg PO BID. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication changes would you make? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan? Case Study 4: Daute is a 56-year-old man seeking evaluation for increasing shortness of breath. He noticed difficulty catching his breath about 3 years ago. Physical activity increases his symptoms. He avoids activity as much as possible to prevent any SOB. His previous physician had placed him on salmeterol/fluticasone (Advair Diskus) one inhalation twice daily 2 years ago. He thinks his physician initiated the medication for the shortness of breath, but he is not entirely sure. He did not refill the prescription and has not been taking it. Pertinent history – Chronic bronchitis X 8 years with one exacerbation in last 12 months of treatment with oral antibiotics. He has a 40-pack-year smoking history. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication(s) would you prescribe? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan?
Author: admin
-
Key Assessment Outline: Theory of Multiple Intelligences I. Introduction A. Background information on Howard Gardner B. Overview of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences C. Purpose of the paper II. Definition of
Using the outline provided in the syllabus, you will submit an outline of your Key Assessment Paper and at least one scholarly article you have found in your research (you must have at least 2 in your final paper). This is a way to ensure that you are making adequate progress on your paper. The outline is simply that, an outline. I expect that
you will add resources and information before your final submission.
Link (Copy and Paste): https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/educationallearningtheories3rd/chapter/chapter-9-theory-of-multiple-intelligences-2/
If the link does not work please let me know.
The purpose of this assignment is to ensure that you are making adequate progress toward the completion of your key assessment. A fully developed paper or ideas are NOT expected as this time.
Education Theorists:
●Howard Gardner
You will use the provided template to help you complete the Key Assessment Outline assignment.
For this assignment, you do not have to use complete sentences.
You will erase the red text in the document. Leave the blue text. Save it.
General ideas are okay…fully developed sentences/paragraphs are not required at this point.
To receive full credit, you must complete MOST of the outline and at least show an attempt on each sub-bullet. -
“Exploring Supply Chain and Logistics: Key Concepts, Applications, and Ethical Considerations”
*** NO AI PAPERS ***
COMPLETE ORDER NUMBERS ; 7815323 AND 7815268 BEFORE COMPLETEING THIS ONE
FILE WIL BE UPLOADED ONCE THE ABOVE FILES ARE COMPLETE
In Week 1 you were to begin a formal project by formulating information pertaining to the following:
An aspect of supply chain and logistics that you are interested in and/or;
How supply chain and logistics are related, yet different and/or;
Key activities in supply chain and logistics and/or;
Ethics and social responsibility in supply chain and logistics management.
The focus of this project should be directed toward applications to your work, and career. Your project may include some or all the above. Additional information should include case analyses, quantitative data, qualitative data, and other material that help support your mastery of this material. Suggested assignments to include are: 2.2, 3.1 and/or 3.2, 4.2, and 5.1. (DO NOT copy and paste the assignments into your final project! The material should flow well).
Assignment 2.2: research regarding the topic of supply chain versus logistics.
Assignment 3.1: supply and demand, and/or 3.2: customer service levels.
Assignment 4.2: primary capabilities, advantages and disadvantages of each of the basic modes of transportation.
Assignment 5.1: e-commerce in the procurement process.
Based on your approved research, write a research paper on your approved topic. Your research paper should be at least 2,000 words in length, and written in APA format, with at least five sources. -
Title: “The Power of Positive Thinking: How Changing Your Mindset Can Change Your Life”
This Journal assignment is due on Tuesday 6/18 @11:59pm:
A Rough Draft of your Outline AND a rough draft of your Script or Essay that makes-up your Ted Talk or Lecture. In other words, I want to see your progress in organizing and writing this Ted Talk/Lecture. See the samples on Canvas that I showed you during the 6/14 Lecture.
Some guidelines for your outline and your speech (Talk or Lecture):
This is for a 8 minute presentation.
This is either for a Ted Talk audience, which is a broader segment of the population, probably fairly educated, etc.Remember the discussion of genre. There are certain criteria that help define a Ted Talk “text.”
OR this is for a college/university classroom audience who are involved in a course studying material represented by your Lecture.
I will not comment on these, but simply reward your points – remember how reasonable I am! For the full 20 points possible on this assignment: Reasonable progress on your Outline, which amounts to ~2 pages of outline, organized notes, etc.
At least 2 pages of your speech/talk drafted with your Works Cited in progress. -
1. Who was selected Foreman and why? Identify characteristics and rationales. The Foreman in “Twelve Angry Men” was Juror 1, played by Martin Balsam. He was selected as the Foreman because he was
Please first list the question followed by your answer.
VIDEO: Watch the film: “Twelve Angry Men” and answer the following questions:
INCLUDE THE QUESTIONS IN BOLD AND NUMBERED IN YOUR FINAL WORK PRODUCT. THEN ANSWER EACH QUESTION BELOW THE QUESTION IN A WELL ORGANIZED AND WELL WRITTEN WORK PRODUCT.
Who was selected Foreman and why? Identify characteristics and rationales.
Identify and list the number and types of evidence considered during deliberation. -
Title: Stakeholder Lessons Learned: Analyzing Project Failures and Implementing Improvements for Future Projects
For this assignment, you will focus on Stakeholder Lessons Learned. Note that the Lessons Learned process is a signficant part of every project and should always be held, and the results documented.
This assignment is a two-part submission to have you look at the Lessons Learned process, how important stakeholders are in this process, and to identify the value produced. Please review the Week 5 slides about Lessons Learned. We will review/discuss them further during our Week 5 meeting. Note the use in the slides of the terms “Plus” (something we did well and want to continue) and “Delta” (something that didn’t go so well and we’d like to change/improve)
Part 1:
Review this article Download this articleand select one of the projects (not the DIA, which you’ve obviously already worked on) to be the focus for this assignment. Note that the article identifies all of these projects as failures, so there should be a signficant amount of Lessons Learned that can be obtained from whichever project you select
Analyze the case and any additional supporting documentation you can find. Based on your analysis, assume you’re running a Lessons Learned session at the end of the project, and provide the following:
An Overview section regarding the case you’ve selected
Identify at least two (2) stakeholder-related issues with this project that would be discussed during the lessons learned session. For each of the issues that you identify, answer the following:
What was the primary issue with the Stakeholders that apparently caused this issue? Be specific when identifying the Stakeholder or the Stakeholder Group.
Was there a specific conflict issue that caused it? How did this conflict negatively impact the project?
What could have been done by the PM/sponsor to resolve this conflict?
Specific to each issue, what is your recommendation for future projects, so this type of issue doesn’t occur going forward (a Delta)?
We tend to focus on the negatives during lessons learned sessions. Based on your analysis of this project, what is one POSITIVE lesson learned (a Plus) from this project that you would recommend continuing to do going forward?
Part 2:
Specific to the DIA case that we’ve used in this course:
Select one (1) Stakeholder GROUP (not an individual) that you identified as part of your identification and analysis processes and indicate why you’ve selected them:
How will you implement lessons learned sessions for this group? For example, when will you hold the session(s)? How many sessions will you hold? Who will be invited? What do you see as the primary areas to focus on? Do you anticipate any conflict as part of the session? Feel free to include anything else you expect to occur in the planning or execution of this Lessons Learned session.
Since many of the DIA stakeholders will be included in future projects targeted at improvements, expansion, etc. at DIA, explain how you will use the outcomes from your Lessons Learned session to help improve future DIA projects using your selected Stakeholder group in particular.
I would recommend the following format for this assignment:
Part 1
Project Overview
Stakeholder Issues to be Discussed at Lessons Learned
LL #1
Primary Issue
Conflict?
Recommendation
LL #2
Primary Issue
Conflict?
Recommendation
Positive (Plus) LL from this project
Part 2 – Specific to the DIA case that was used throughout this course:
Stakeholder GROUP you’ve selected and why
How will you implement lessons learned sessions for this group?
How will you use the Lessons Learned results for future projects? -
“The Impact of Social Media on Society: Exploring its Influence, Misinformation, and Toxicity”
Strange topic for an Physics 100 class but it is very wide open.
Topic is Social Media and its effects on society.
Must have 5 sources, no Wikipedia
Will be a standard speaking presantation with speaker.
Just ideas,
a. Influence of social media on people’s mindset
b. Role of social media in spreading misinformation
c. Role of social media in spreading toxic content -
“Breaking Barriers: The Unstoppable Toughness of the WNBA”
Need complete originality, no plagiarism, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-wnba-has-always-been-tough-its-the-men-who-cant-stop-crying_n_666231e2e4b091105f3a1d98
-
Assignment 1: Ethical Issues in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Assignment 2: The Importance of Informed Consent in Research Studies Assignment 3: Understanding Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Analysis in Oral Health Research
Assignment 1: https://youtu.be/afwK2CVpc9E
In this week’s module, we have learned about the appropriate ethical treatment of research study participants, as well as the appropriate consent and ethical committee review (Institutional Review Board) necessary to conduct a research study.
The Tuskegee Syphilis study is historically one of the most unethical studies conducted by the United States Public Health Service. In the short video that you will watch, you will learn more about this study.
Your assignment for this week is to:
Watch the short attached video about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Using 1 page or less, comment on the ethical issues with this study, using terminology from Chapters 17 and 18, such as coercion, and nonmaleficence.
Talk about the consent process here, what is missing?
Please use at least 1 evidence-based citation.
Assignment 2: Ensuring that participation in a research study is voluntary and that the study runs with ethical practices is of the utmost importance. Why is it important that research participants are consented to participate, and what is understood consent? Give an example of what could be considered coercion in a research study.
Assignment 3: What is the difference between primary, secondary and tertiary analysis? In oral health provide examples of where primary, secondary, and tertiary analysis could be used.
(assignemtns 2 and 3 are for a discussion board can be short and concise)
(Don’t forget references for all assignments) -
“Reflecting on my Learning Journey: Assimilating Knowledge from this Course”
Now, reflect on the experience you have had in this course to see how you may want to assimilate what you have learned. Write a short reflection based on one or two significant learning experiences that you had during this course. Try to be as clear and accurate in your perceptions as you can.
Reflection Guidelines
Reflection is a valuable practice in your learning process. It assists in the assimilation of new understanding into your everyday life.
Reflection is often casually mentioned after a learning experience by asking “What lessons did you learn?” Although this question refers to the process and is a good place to start, it doesn’t address the full process of reflection.
Reflection Steps:
Recall
Think back on any experiences you may have had in this course during the learning process that seem to stand out.
Contemplate
What is significant about these experiences? What broader perspectives might apply? What do you understand about them now based on a broader perspective?
Transformation
What does this mean for you in the future? Develop a plan for creating any changes that you would like to make.
An effective reflection will focus successively on each of these phases. It will hopefully result in a deeper understanding of knowledge that you have gained during your learning experiences and prompt changes in your practices, perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes.