Brisk Essay Writers

Author: admin

  • “Exploring the Relationship between Risk and Returns in Financial Markets: A Study of Investment Decisions and Factors Affecting Consumer Choices in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”

    use the attached file as a sample
    the research will focus in consumers rather than firms. moreover, what are the risks and returns in financials investment; and examine the relationship between risk and returns in financial markets. who investment make the decisions. and what are the factors do investors take into consideration or the look for when investing in company
    it should be in kingdom of Saudi Arabia for example in Tadawul there are many Big Saudi companies you can choose. such as Armco, STC, SABIC . however, companies shoud be 15 to 20
    – methodology will be quantitative; seven multiple choice questions
    – 8 pages should cover the literature review and the references should be 10 to 15 from last five years
    kindly find the links below it’s good resources:

    9 Factors to Consider When Making Investment Decisions


    https://blackswancapital.eu/5-most-important-factors/

  • “The Toll of the Pandemic on Healthcare Heroes”

    Listen to podcast then answer 5 questions …. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/22/904695784/as-pandemic-persists-health-care-heroes-beginning-to-crack-under-the-strain

  • Meeting Course Objectives: A Reflection on MN660 Throughout the course of MN660, I feel that the learning objectives were effectively met through a combination of course materials and assignments. In this discussion post, I will provide examples of how each objective

    Construct a discussion post that identifies how you feel the learning objectives were met, supported with examples of course materials and course assignments.
    For any course objectives you feel were not met during the course, please provide a discussion of why they were not met.
    Here are the course learning objectives for your review:
    Course Objectives:
    MN660-1: Examine basic neuroanatomy and neurophysiology mechanisms with correlation to clinical psychiatric mental health disorders and diseases, trauma and injury, and genetic, developmental, or substance induced disorders in individuals across the lifespan. 
    MN660-2: Integrate neurobiology, pathophysiology, and population health in assessment, diagnosis, and management of individuals, groups, and families across the lifespan with acute, chronic, and complex mental health disorders.
    MN660-3: Formulate the use of evidence-based best practices related to pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and complementary therapeutic treatment plans for individuals with acute, episodic, chronic, and complex mental health disorders.
    MN660-4: Appraise the role of the PMHNP to integrate legal, ethical, and evidence-based practices for prescribing and managing psychotropic therapies for individuals across the lifespan with acute, chronic, and complex mental health disorders.
    MN660-5: Evaluate professional collaborations for advocacy, policy development, healthcare promotion and disease prevention, safety, and the management of care for individuals across the lifespan with acute, chronic, and complex mental health disorders.
    Provide evidence (citations and references) to support your statements and opinions.

  • “Team Update: Analyzing Our How the Market Works Portfolio Performance” Hello class, As we approach the end of the semester, our team has been diligently monitoring the performance of our How the Market Works portfolio. We are excited to share our progress

    Over the last several weeks, your team has been carefully monitoring the performance of your How the Market Works portfolio. Your team also submitted a brief memo to the instructor. For this discussion forum, craft one post as a team to share with the rest of the class.
    This post should include a snapshot of your portfolio. This could include its current value. It could also include whether it has increased or decrease in value. Be sure to include your team’s insight as to why this change has occurred and its potential impact.
    You are not expected to divulge your team’s strategy or your specific complement of stock investments. The purpose is to generate thought and discussion.
    the website is : https://app.howthemarketworks.com/accounting/openpositions
    username is: Stockteam_1024 and the password is: Fin301$!

  • “Exploring Literary Criticism: A Mentor Study of a Peer-Reviewed Academic Article”

    Purpose: To provide students with the opportunity to conduct a mentor study of a published, peer-reviewed, scholarly analysis, with the goal of gaining understanding about how literary analysis functions and what a strong literary analysis should look like. Description: Over the last several weeks, we have been working on developing your ability to interpret a text. Now, here at the end of the semester, we will be working on increasing the complexity of your analytical skills by entering into literary criticism. The goal of this unit is to formalize your understanding of how to approach different texts by introducing you to some of the schools of criticism scholars utilize when working with literature. Choosing a Peer-Reviewed article for Mentor Study: Students are tasked with selecting a peer-reviewed, academic article that discusses one of the texts we’ve covered in the course up to this point. Those literary selections can be found throughout the units. Students can use a text they’ve already written about. This peer-reviewed article will serve as your mentor text for this assignment. All tasks outlined in the instructions will be referring to this article. Instructions: The following instructions detail the outline that your mentor study needs to follow: Introduction (5-7 sentences)In the introduction, students must introduce the title and author of their peer-reviewed, academic article (NOT their literary selection). They must also include a briefy summary of their chosen article. The thesis statement should be a restatement of the article’s thesis, in the student’s own words. Categorization (5-7 sentences)In this paragraph, students must explain how their article fits the criteria of “peer-reviewed”. They must also explain why this article is classified as an academic source. Finally, students need to include where they found/accessed the article. Explanation of Article Organization (5-7 sentences)In this paragraph, students must explain how the author of their chosen article organized their analysis. Evaluation of Article Organization (7-10 sentences)In this paragraph, students must evaluate the strength/effectiveness of the organization of the article. Incorporation of Research (5-7 sentences)In this paragraph, students need to identify the way the author incorporates outside research into their analysis. Evaluation of the Incorporation of Research (7-10 sentences)In this paragraph, students need to evaluate the way the author incorporates research into their writing. Students also need to evaluate the sources the author chose to incorporate. Explanation of Article Analysis (7-10 sentences)In this paragraph, students must explain, in their own words, the analysis presented by the author of their article. Evaluation of Article Analysis (7-10 sentences)In this paragraph, students must evaluate the strenth of the author’s analysis. Students must explain their critique, citing specific examples from the article to support their evaluation. Student Reflection (10-15 sentences)In this paragraph, students need to reflect on what they learned through their study of their chosen mentor article. Students must pull specific examples from the article to support their reflection. Works CitedThe works cited must include an MLA style entry for their chosen mentor article. *Student submissions must be in MLA format. *Student submissions must be a pdf file. Please keep in mind that, while there is a sentence count and not a word count, these standards are set with the expectation of student’s writing in complex, compound sentences. Students who only write in simple sentences and who fail to exhibit a thoughtful and critical evaluation of their mentor article will see that lack of depth reflected in their grade. All length requirements are minimums, and students should feel free to exceed any length requirements listed above, as needed.

  • Title: Applying the Scientific Method in Everyday Life

    please select a quote from Chapter 1 that highlights an important idea from the readings. For example, as we see in Chapter 1, physical anthropology is the study of “the origins of hominins (i.e. humans and fossil human relatives), how they adapted over time, and how we – modern humans – continue to change” (Chapter 1, page 4). This quote is important because it foregrounds the study of humans from an evolutionary perspective, and places great emphasis on the fact that we continue to adapt and change today and into the future. It is crucial to provide a quote with chapter and page number in parentheses.
    Please conclude this first discussion post briefly discussing an example in your life in which you have applied (in the past) or could apply (in the future) the scientific method to expand your understanding of the world around you. To help you structure this part of your post, please reflect on the following questions:
    Why is direct observation important?
    How does direct observation influence our thinking about a particular object?
    What can the physical details of objects lead to new insights about the world around us?
    Why is testing hypotheses important?
    What happens if testing suggests a particular hypothesis is wrong?
    Why is sharing research results important?
    How can dialogue with others help expand knowledge?

  • “The Ethics of Eating Meat: A Moral Compass Perspective” Slide 1: Introduction – Briefly introduce the topic of ethical issues and the focus of this presentation – Introduce the specific ethical issue of eating meat and its relevance in today’s

    Create an 8-10 slide PPT, or some other presentation, that accomplishes the following:
    Chose some ethical issue you feel is important (abortion, gun control, climate change, eating meat, anything that can be considered a moral matter – if you are unsure, be sure to clear with your instructor)
    Present research on the situation being sure to clearly discuss both sides, as much as possible. Some conundrums will have much more weight on one side than the other such as climate change.
    Reiterate the primary theories contained in your moral compass from week 3 and then explain the position on this issue your compass promotes.
    Include a proper references/works cited slide (APA or MLA).
    For example, say you want to address gender-neutral bathrooms in public buildings. First, present some research from sources promoting that they should exist and from sources promoting they should not. Then reiterate the components of your moral compass as stated in the week three paper. Note, your compass may have evolved and if so, work in the new components. Finally, state your position clearly (they should or should not exist) and how your compass justifies that position.
    Keep in mind these best practices, please: 
    Proper PPTs have bullets on the slide that are explained in the notes section (see video on how to do this if you do not know how). 
    If you intend to narrate the presentation, be sure to include the transcript in the notes section (see PPT on how to insert audio if you do not know and want to give that a shot). 
    If, for any reason you are unable to access the notes section, put the transcript/notes in a MS Word document in a numbered list with the numbers matching the slide.
    Keep the viewer in mind (teacher). While you might work hard on a 20-minute presentation, few faculty members have the time to watch or listen to it.
    Just like papers, clear citations must appear on the slide or in the notes to justify listing a resource as a reference.

  • Title: The Journeys of Don Quixote: Examining Motivations, Heroes, and the Balance of Reality and Imagination

    The test is open book, so use quotes from the plays in your essay responses. Cite the quotes from the primary source. If you use any secondary sources, you must cite all information and direct quotes from them and include a Works Cited page in MLA format. Put all your responses in one Microsoft Word document and submit it to the dropbox. Be sure to double space the entire document. A Discussion Board rubric is attached to give you guidance on grading.
    Short Answer. Briefly, in one to three sentences each, respond to the following questions. Each counts up to 10 points.
    What is Señor Quejana’s motivation for slipping into the persona of Don Quixote?
    To what extent does the readers’ knowledge of the stories in Alonso Quejana’s library help them to understand Don Quixote’s quest for knight errantry?
    Why does Carrasco as the Knight of the Mirrors and the Knight of the White Moon fight Don Quixote?
    Why do Don Quixote and Sancho Panza need to leave La Mancha for their adventures to occur?
    How does the role of the journey in Don Quixote compare with the journey in Gilgamesh, in which the heroes’ journeys play a central role?
    Select one. Write a response to your selected question in approximately one page in double-spaced MLA format, using details and quotes from the work to support your response. Each response is worth up to 50 points.
    One way to consider a character in a literary work as a hero is that he or she is the one who determines and qualifies the actions and attitudes of other characters. Explain how Quixote can be viewed as a hero in this sense, examining one or more of the characters of Sancho, Antonia, the curate and the barber, and/or Sansón Carrasco.
    How does the juxtaposition of fact and fiction within the work, including the “historical” accounts of Don Quixote’s exploits as a knight errant to which the readers are often referred, present the reality of the two main characters, Don Quixote/Señor Quejana and Sancho Panza? How do the characters keep the balance between madness and sanity, between imagination and reality, and/or between right and wrong?

  • “Exploring the Intersection of Psychological Theories and Therapeutic Modalities: A Comparative Analysis and Reflection on Mental Health Treatment”

    Comparative Analysis of Psychological Theories and Therapeutic Modalities
    Objective:
    This assignment aims to assess your understanding and analytical skills regarding the major psychological theories and their applications to mental health, alongside the different therapeutic approaches and modalities. You will demonstrate your ability to critically evaluate these concepts and their practical implications in real-world settings.
    Deliverables:
    Comparative Essay (1,200-1,500 words):
    Part 1: Analyze and compare the foundational principles of cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and humanistic theories, emphasizing their applications to mental health.
    Part 2: Examine individual, group, and family therapy modalities, discussing their benefits, challenges, and suitability for different types of mental health issues, supplemented with case examples.
    Reflection (300 words):
    Reflect on the potential integration of different psychological theories and therapeutic modalities in treating a hypothetical client. Consider factors such as the client’s condition, preferences, and cultural background.
    Grading Rubric:
    Total Points: 100
    Analysis of Psychological Theories 
    Depth and accuracy in the comparison of cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and humanistic theories. 
    Clarity in explaining their applications to mental health, with examples. 
    Examination of Therapeutic Modalities 
    Comprehensive discussion of individual, group, and family therapy modalities. 
    Insightful analysis of benefits, challenges, and suitability, supported by case examples. 
    Integration and Reflection 
    Creativity and insight in the hypothetical integration of psychological theories and therapeutic modalities for a client scenario.
    Depth of reflection on the complexities and ethical considerations involved. 
    Quality of Writing
    Organization and coherence of the essay, with a clear structure and logical flow of ideas. 
    Grammar, punctuation, and adherence to the word count requirement. 
    Proper citation of sources and adherence to academic standards for integrity and plagiarism. 
    Originality and critical thinking demonstrated in the analysis and reflection. 
    Submission Guidelines:
    Submit your assignment as a PDF document through the course’s online platform.
    Ensure your assignment includes a title page with your name, the date, and the assignment title.
    Use APA format for in-text citations and the reference list.
    The assignment is due by [JUNE 28TH ]. Late submissions will be penalized at a rate of 5 points per day.
    This assignment provides an opportunity to critically engage with key concepts in psychology and therapeutic practices. By comparing different theories and modalities, and reflecting on their integration, you will deepen your understanding of the nuanced approaches to mental health treatment.

  • Title: Text Conversations Behind Famous Paintings

    You are going to find paintings by the following artists, and then you are going to create a text conversation behind it. Create a conversation between the artist and someone else 
    they may know, OR create a conversation between the individuals in the actual painting, 
    explaining what led up to the scene in the painting. You can use the fake text message 
    conversation creator here: https://ifaketextmessage.com/ or if you have another 
    application you like better, like Canva, thats fine too. 
    You must create a conversation for THREE of the following artists:
    – Caravaggio
    – Artemisia Gentileschi
    – Bernini
    – Jan Vermeer
    – Rembrandt
    – Diego Velasquez
    – Peter Paul Rubens
    – Nicholas Poussin
    INSTRUCTIONS:
    1) Pick one of their paintings or sculptures that speak to you and create a text conversation
    based on that image
    2) The conversation should be at least 4 messages per person (4 imcoming and 4 
    outgoing), but more is fine. 
    3) Include the image of your paintings (identified with artist and name) and the image of
    your text message in your submission (one document is fine).
    4) You can be as creative as you want, but just make sure I can read what you wrote. 
    HERE’s A EXAMPLE: By the way, Caraviggio killed a tavern boy because he delivered an 
    artichoke to the table. At the time, artichokes were only for peasants and a sign of poverty.
    Caraviggio was angered because he thought the boy was saying he was poor. So I have 
    Caravaggio talking to a friend with the painting being “What Happned” when the artichoke
    was delivered. See where I’m going with this?
    Please look at the uploads I have added for an example view.