Examine the impacts of policies and edicts of king Cyrus on the Social-Enomomic and religious life of the Jewish people in Babylonian exile and after the return to Judah
Author: admin
-
Title: “The Importance of Proprioception: Insights from Mechanoreceptors and Ian Waterman’s Case”
Review the different types of mechanoreceptors here:
https://learninglink.oup.com/ebook/access/content/wolfe6e-student-resources/wolfe6e-activity-alternative-13-2-somatosensory-receptors?options=showName
Watch this short video about Ian Waterman, a man who lost his sense of proprioception after a viral infection:
Read about proprioceptive deficits here: https://theconversation.com/proprioception-our-imperceptible-6th-sense-150775
Choose one type of mechanoreceptor. Discuss what the perception of touch would be like for a person lacking that specific mechanoreceptor. Are there things that would remain normal? What aspects of touch would change?
Proprioception is something most of us take for granted. Ian Waterman’s case shows us the outcome of losing this ability. Think about why something like proprioception is necessary for humans. What do these cases show us about the importance of proprioception? Comment on the necessity for this sense to be completed imperceptibly or unconsciously. -
Pharmacology Case Studies: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders
Welcome to week 4! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems.
Symptoms of various gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders often overlap, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. For example, symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea are non-specific and could also be the result of underlying medical history or current prescription drug use. As an advanced practice nurse, you could be potentially responsible for providing care to a patient who may present with non-specific symptoms related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems.
When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (ie diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease.
ASSIGNMENT
Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.
For your week 4 assignment, evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.
To Prepare:
• Review the case studies (attachment) and answer ALL questions.
• When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, special instructions, # dispensed (days supply), refills, etc. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications.
• Use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers. Please review all Required Learning Resources. Use the Medscape app or website and JNC 8 to complete assignment.
• Include at least three references to support each scenario and cite them in APA format. Please include in-text citations. You do not need an introduction or conclusion paragraph.NURS_6521_Week4_Scenarios-1.docxDownload NURS_6521_Week4_Scenarios-1.docx
Note on Assignment Attempts
Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted prior to the assignment deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is not permitted. -
“Exploring the Screening and Diagnosis Process for Autism Spectrum Disorder”
The assignment is called “First Paper” the topic for the assignment is
“Screening and Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder” in APA style 7Th edition, 4-5 pages (excluding the title and reference pages) i -
“The Power of Art: Examining the Role of Eco-Artists in Promoting Environmental Change” Introduction: The world is facing an unprecedented environmental crisis, with issues such as climate change, pollution, and depletion of natural resources threatening the very existence “Artistic Perspectives on Environmental Issues: A Comparative Analysis of Two Contemporary Artists” Collaborating for Change: An Eco-Art Project on Waste Management by Jean Shin and Mierle Laderman Ukeles “Preserving Species Through Art: Exploring the Works of Maya Lin and Brandon Ballengee”
ESSAY OVERVIEW
2000+ WORD COUNT
(Word count refers to the body text and does not include references, footnotes, or headers)
For the Term Project, you are required to write an Expository Essay, which is a type of essay that requires you to investigate an idea, evaluate evidence, expound on the idea, and create an argument concerning that idea, in a clear and concise manner. The objective of the Term Project assignment is to analyze the major question of the course which is, In what ways can art effect change?
In 2,000+ words, your essay will focus on the ONE eco-topic (chosen from the list provided) and TWO eco-artists/artworks that create art about that same eco-topic. The selected artists/artworks will need to relate well to the chosen the eco-topic. Artists/artworks should be selected from this course (module materials or course textbook), however, one eco-artist may be selected from independent research outside of the course materials. The eco-topic and artist selection will need to be approved by the instructor for the proposal assignment prior to beginning the essay.
In the essay, the selected eco-topic will first be introduced to the reader using statistical data to support why it is an eco-topic that deserves attention. The artists will be introduced at the end of the introduction and their work will be linked to the eco-topic in the thesis statement at the end of the introduction. Each artist will then be introduced using relevant background information, and an artwork by each artist will be described and interpreted, and connected to the eco-topic, using research as support. The artists will then be compared/contrasted in various areas of artistic discipline, materials, and strategies. Next, a proposed idea will be developed for a project that these two artists could collaborate on together based on their previous experience. This is an opportunity to be creative and plan a detailed project idea that is new and unique to both artists, rather than simply a mash-up of previous projects. The essay will conclude with how two artists are affecting change within the environment and/or community and will evaluate how effective the two artists are in the conveying the eco-topic in the context of their work.
*** Please be sure to follow the *Required* Essay Outline, below.
ESSAY EXAMPLE: Please review the essay example listed in the Term Project Essay Module. The example essay shows a successful essay that follows the outline provided and properly uses CMS footnotes to cite referenced information.
POINT OF VIEW/ TONE: Please write your Essay using the objective 3rd person point of view, avoiding the use of “I, we, you, and us”. The essay should be written in the present tense and the tone should be objective. Please do not recognize the assignment in the writing for the essay.
*REQUIRED* CMS FORMAT FOOTNOTES: Your essay should also be formatted in the Chicago Manual of Style that uses numbered footnotes to identify ALL cited information. Your sources should directly reference your numbered footnotes and make your cited information clear to the reader. If you need help with CMS footnotes, please review the Resources Module at the top of the Modules Page for tutorials and help using CMS footnotes.
Essays WITHOUT CMS footnotes to mark all cited information throughout the essay, will receive a grade of ZERO, as it is considered plagiarism if referenced information is not acknowledged!!!
Please review FSU’s Academic Honor Policy: http://fda.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/imported/storage/original/application/0ab8e9de6a98c1377d68de9717988bda.pdf
*REQUIRED* SOURCES: All 6 sources selected from the Annotated Bibliography portion of your Proposal should be used in your essay. You can always add or change sources if needed, but 6 sources will need to be used. It is important to include reliable and high quality researched information in your Term Project, using a mix of both credible and scholarly sources.
ASSIGNMENT FORMATTING: This Expository Essay should be written in the 3rd person point of view and use Chicago Manual of Style formatting, including numbered footnotes.
SUBMISSION: Submit your TERM PROJECT ESSAY by using the assignment submission tool located in the “Assignments” tab. NOTE: Acceptable file format is PDF only.
This assignment is required and worth up to 400 points of your final course grade. This Essay fulfills the Scholarship In Practice Requirement for this course and is a required assignment.
*REQUIRED* ESSAY OUTLINE
(FIRST PAGE)
TITLE PAGE: Please include: Assignment Title, Your Name, Professor’s Name, Class/Section, and Date.
(NEXT PAGE)
PARAGRAPH 1: This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeECO-TOPIC INTRODUCTION + STATISTICAL DATA + THESIS STATEMENT
Please do not recognize the assignment in your writing and be sure to write in the present tense and from the objective third person perspective.
In the first paragraph, set the stage for the reader with opening statements to introduce the eco-topic.
Provide research based statistical data, as well as facts, to describe why the eco-issue deserves attention. Source/s should be used from the FSU library for the statistical data.
Next, you will introduce the artists and their artworks. (You will be extensively introducing them in the following paragraphs, so please be brief.)
To end the introduction, you will create a thesis statement that links the artists to the eco-topic. Be sure to describe the title of the artwork for each artist, along with the genre of the artworks and connect the eco topic to these artists work. The thesis statement is usually the last sentences of the introduction paragraph.
PARAGRAPH 2: This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeARTIST #1: ARTWORK DESCRIPTION + INTERPRETATION
Introduce the artist by discussing any relevant background information and describe the type of work they create.
Identify a specific artwork by this artist that relates to the eco-topic you have chosen to write about. Include: Title, date and materials used.
Describe the key visual aspects of a specific artwork in detail, using research as support. What does the artwork look like and how is it organized? Think about the scale, materials, and all of the visual components.
Based on research, interpret what the artwork is about, making connections with the visual and conceptual elements of the piece and the eco-topic, while examining underlying themes. Please use research as support.
PARAGRAPH 3: This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeARTIST #2: ARTWORK DESCRIPTION + INTERPRETATION
Introduce the artist by discussing any relevant background information and describe the type of work they create.
Identify a specific artwork by this artist that relates to the eco-topic you have chosen to write about. Include: Title, date and materials used.
Describe the key visual aspects of a specific artwork in detail, using research as support. What does the artwork look like and how is it organized? Think about the scale, materials, and all of the visual components.
Based on research, interpret what the artwork is about, making connections with the visual and conceptual elements of the piece and the eco-topic, while examining underlying themes. Please use research as support.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PARAGRAPH 4: COMPARISON + ANALYSIS OF ARTWORKS
Compare how each artist/artwork are similar through the analysis and investigation of specific artistic approaches, disciplines, materials, and strategies used for each artist, using researched details as support.
Contrast how each artist/artwork are different through the analysis and investigation of specific artistic approaches, disciplines, materials, and strategies used for each artist, using researched details as support.
Evaluate how effective the two artists are in visually and conceptually conveying the eco-topic in their work, using specific supporting examples.
PARAGRAPH 5: ARTIST COLLABORATION
Develop an idea for a project that these two artists could collaborate on together, centered around the selected eco-topic.
First make an argument for why these two artists should collaborate together on an art project and later discuss how the project could impact the community and/or create awareness about the eco-topic.
What are new ways the artists can use their talents to create a new and dynamic project together? Think about a new idea instead of re-creating a project they have already done.This is an opportunity to be creative and plan a detailed project idea that is new and unique to both artists, rather than simply a mash-up of previous projects.
How will both artists be equally represented in the collaboration?
Include a specific location of the project, not just the city, but the venue and why you have selected this location.
What the project would look like? (scale and visual characteristics).
What materials will be used? What process will the artists use?
Will people interact with the project? If so, how?
PARAGRAPH 6: CONCLUSION
Analyze how the two artists are inspiring or affecting change within the environment or community, using specific supporting examples.
Conclude your essay with statements that support your thesis, synthesizing research in order to come to an original and well-informed conclusions about the eco-topic and the impact of the artists. Wrap-up the main points of your essay to the reader.
(LAST PAGE)
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Bibliography should be on its own page at the end of your Term Project Essay, noting your sources in the proper Chicago Manuel of Style format. Please note that this a regular bibliography, without the annotations
References should be in Alphabetical order by author’s last name. If the author is not available, then the title should be used for alphabetical order.
Please single-space and indent after the first line for each reference.
Please include a working link for each source.
Please be sure you have used all the sources listed in your paper at least once.
EXAMPLES OF ECO-TOPICS + ARTIST SELECTION
Please choose only ONE eco-topic + TWO artists (ONE artwork by each artist that relates to the eco-topic selected)
WASTE
• water pollution: Alexis Rockman, Betsy Damon, Bright Ugochukwu Eke, Mel Chin, Alejandro Duran, Sue Lipscombe,
Marina DeBris, Mandy Barker, Tan Xi ZI, Benjamin Von Wong, Hans Haacke, Pam Longobardi, Angela
Pozzi, Gilberto Esparza, Jeremy Gobe
• single-use plastics: Daniel Webb, Alejandro Duran, Mandy Barker, Bright Ugochukwu Eke, Mel Chin, Sue Lipscombe, Jean
Shin, Tue Greenfort, Pam Longobardi, David Webb, Benjamin Von Wong, Aurora Robison
• post-consumer waste/mass consumption: Jean Shin, Mary Mattingly, Chris Jordan, Reverand Billy Talen
• e-waste/planned obsolescence: Chu Yun, Eduardo Relero, Peter McFarlane, Haribaabu Naatesan
• up-cycling materials: Michelle Reader, Guerra de le Paz, Simon Starling, Pedro Reyes, Mel Chin, Wim Delvoye, Lin Evola-
Smidt, Ruganzu Bruno
• waste management: Hans Haacke, Mierle Laderman Ukeles, Viet Ngo
GLOBAL WARMING
• global warming: Marina Zurkow, Tue Greenfort, Olafur Eliasson, Tue Greenfort, Tavares Strachan,
Edgar Martins, David Buckland, Daniel Beltra
• sea-level rise: Mel Chin, Eve Mosher, Haubitz + Zoche, Tea Makipaa, Mary Mattingly, Carolina Aragon
ENERGY
• energy conservation/ alternative energy: Amy Franceschini, Tomas Saraceno, Hehe
• fossil fuel dependance/air pollution: Hehe, Michael Pinsky, Anirudh Sharma, Kim Abele, Simon Starling
• industrial pollution: David Maisel, Beehive Design Collective, Mitch Epstein, Gilberto Esparza, David
Mainsel, John Sabraw, Mel Chin
SUSTAINABILITY
• sustainable farming: Nicole Fournier, Viet Ngo, Mary Mattingly, Artist As Family, Gerda Steiner and
Jorg Lenzlinger, Tissue Culture + Art Project
• biomimicry: Friedensrich Hundertwasser, Jae Rhim Lee, Mario Merz, Viet Ngo, Tomas Saraceno,
Jeremy Gobe
• urban farming: Mary Mattingly, Fritz Haeg, Ron Finley, Gerda Steiner and Jorg Lenzlinger
• green architecture: Friedensrich Hundertwasser
HABITAT
• preservation of land and natural resources: Alan Sonfist
• habitat loss/deforestation/loss of biodiversity: Alan Sonfist, Daniel Beltra,Yun-Fei Jei, Fernando
Garcia-Dory, Bonnie Ora-Sherk, Helen and Newton Harrison, Alan Sonfist
• extinction/species loss/ loss of biodiversity: Alison Turnbull, Maya Lin, Brandon Ballengee, Nick
Brandt, Esther Traugot, Cai Guo-Qiang, Helen and Newton Harrison
• species preservation: Brandon Ballengee, Maya Lin
• urban ecology: Basia Irland, Buster Simpson, Helen and Newton Harrison, Gerda Steiner and Jorg
Lenzlinger
ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION
• environmental remediation: Mel Chin, Mart Tremonte, Viet Ngo, John Sabraw, Hans Haacke
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
• environmental education: Katie Holten, Fallen Fruit Collective, Amy Franceschini
• community healing/social change through art: Lily Yeh, Pedro Reyes, Chris Jordan
• innovative solutions to municipal problems: Viet Ngo, Hans Haacke
• urban development + globalization: Free Soil, Micheal Mandiberg, Dirk Fleischmann
From me: Topic – species preservation
lib.fsu.edu – for sources
My artists- Maya Lin, Brandon Ballengee -
“Garden Club Mail Merge and Update”
The scenario:
Success Gardens is planning to feature a garden club each week on its show and wants to invite garden clubs to apply. You have been asked to update the contact information for the clubs in an Excel workbook, modify the workbook including the contact information, and then create individualized letters and envelopes using mail merge.
For this assignment, you will need the following files:
New blank Word document
Garden_Clubs.xlsx
Club_Information.xdoc
Contacts_Letter.xdoc
You will save your files as:
Lastname_Firstname_Garden_Clubs.xlsx
Lastname_Firstname_Club_Information.xdoc
Lastname_Firstname_Contacts_Letter.xdoc
Lastname_Firstname_Club_Letters.xdoc
Lastname_Firstname_Club_Envelopes.xdoc
Open the Garden_Clubs.xlsx, and save it as Lastname_Firstname_Garden_Clubs.xlsx
Add the information below, using your First Name and Last Name for the last record.
High Rise Garden Path
Curtis Gailliard
3931 Wallace
Houston TX 77004
713-555-5771
County Green
First Name Last Name
7847 Faith Ave
Houston TX 77004
713-555-4774
Update the Address Column for the Evergreen Gardeners to 4525 Center Ave
Delete the row for Velvet Gloves.
Apply AutoFit to all columns.
Copy the contents of the Clubs Name Column
Open the provided file Club_Information.xdoc.
Paste copied contents into Club_Information document
Ensure the font and font size is the same through the letter.
Format the information sheet to display as a one-page document
Include a page color, page border, and theme.
Save the document as Lastname_Firstname_Club_Information
Open the Contacts_Letter.xdoc, and save it as Lastname_Firstname_Contacts_Letter
Using mail merge, include appropriate merge fields from the Garden Clubs Excel workbook in the letter adding the Name and address under date.
Update the date to the current date of this assignment.
Complete the merge, and then save the merged letters as Lastname_Firstname_Club_Letters.xdoc
Create envelopes to be used with the letters, using Success Gardens’ address as the return address.
Save the merged envelopes as Lastname_Firstname_Club_Envelopes
Insert your name in the footer for each of the Word documents. -
Title: The Case of John Moore: Informed Consent and Ownership of Genetic Material
In 1976, John Moore was treated in a hospital in California for a rare type of leukemia (a condition in which white blood cells become cancerous and grow at an advanced rate). Moore was treated, his spleen was removed, and his leukemia went into remission. He periodically returned to California to have blood drawn, which he thought was part of his treatment. Moore signed a consent form to allow the doctors to conduct research on his cells. The doctors discovered that Moore’s cells produced a unique protein that could be used to treat certain types of cancer. Using genetic engineering, the doctors produced a pharmaceutical product with promising medical uses and high commercial profit. The doctors sold the product to a company that would investigate and market the product. Moore was never informed about the use of his cells or their potential commercial value. Moore filed a lawsuit, charging that he did not give informed consent to use his “property” because the doctors did not provide enough information needed to make informed consent (they did not tell him that they may sell products retrieved from his cells). In addition, because of the lack of informed consent, Moore argued that his relationship with his physicians was breached.
Do the doctors owe some of their earnings to Moore? If so, how much? If not, why?
Do you think the doctors did something wrong? If you were the judge in this case, how would you rule? Why? (Don’t worry – you are not required to look into the actual legalities of the issue or required to spend time looking up specific case laws – that is beyond the scope of the course, unless you are interested and just want to know, then by all means look it up and share the info you find!)
Do we own our DNA like property? For example, if you have a tooth pulled, or your appendix removed, and the surgeons keep your tissue, should you be compensated if they make a profit off of the research they perform? -
Title: Balancing Constitutional Rights and Government Power in the Criminal Justice System
Respond to all five questions presented. Be sure to include key points in the assigned readings and videos on the Learning and Assessment Activities page within your examination responses.
Final essay examination questions:
Explain fully the five exceptions to the “exclusionary rule.”
Identify and explain the differences between the two types of civil lawsuits that can be brought against an individual, state, and federal officers.
Identify and explain which Constitutional rights defendants waive when they enter a guilty plea. Also, identify and describe the specific protections that the three major controlling U.S. Supreme Court cases require of judges when a defendant pleads guilty.
Compare and contrast sentencing guidelines with mandatory minimum sentences, including the three aims of each type of sentence.
Identify and assess the counterterrorism and counterintelligence provisions of the USA Patriot Act within the context of balancing the government’s power with individual privacy.
When developing your answers, you must include (cited) facts to support the major points in your response. Your responses should not include continuous citations without your thoughts and analysis also. Rather, your responses must reflect a balance between facts and your perspective on the points you made.
Your responses to each of the examination questions should be a minimum of two pages and a maximum of three pages in length, double-spaced, and written in 12-point Times New Roman.
Include the question you are responding to immediately before each answer.
Include a title/cover page.
Include some cited references and format them in the American Psychological Association (APA) writing style. -
“Revolutionizing the Aerospace Industry: Exploring SpaceX’s Sales Force Management and Strategies”
My paper explores the sales force management structure of SpaceX, focusing on how the company sells rockets to government entities and commercial clients. It examines key roles within the sales team, such as technical sales representatives, account managers, business development executives, and sales engineers. The paper also outlines SpaceX’s sales strategies, including direct sales to government agencies, targeting commercial clients, and forming strategic partnerships. Key performance metrics and challenges, such as technical complexity, market competition, and regulatory issues, are discussed along with the solutions SpaceX employs. The analysis highlights SpaceX’s effective sales strategies in the high-tech aerospace market.
-
“Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Implementing Bedside Shift Report in Hospital Settings to Improve Satisfaction and Safety Outcomes” Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline “Implementing an Evidence-Based Intervention: A PICOT Analysis and Synthesis of Supporting Evidence” “Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions: A Comprehensive Review and Stakeholder Analysis” “Mastering Graduate-Level Writing: The Importance of Proper Referencing and APA Formatting”
PICOT question –
During shift change in hospital settings(P), how does implementing bedside shift report(I), compared to communication/shift change at the nurse’s station(C), affect improved satisfaction and safety outcomes(O), over a three-month period(T)?
NR505-10926
Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
Week 7: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 150
Submitting a file upload
Purpose
Earlier in the course, an issue was identified that influences practice. The impact of the issue was explored, and an evidence-based intervention was proposed via development of a PICOT statement. Scholarly literature was reviewed to identify evidence in support of the intervention in order to achieve the outcome described in the PICOT statement.
The purpose of this assignment is to draw upon previous learning in the course to create a proposal for an evidence-based practice intervention. The outline will include the following elements: overview and significance of the practice issue, PICOT statement, description of proposed intervention and expected outcome, synthesis of evidence from scholarly literature to support the proposed intervention, and stakeholder implications.
Click the following link to download and view a student exemplar example: NR505 Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Student ExemplarLinks to an external site..
Click the following link for a printable version of the instructions: NR505 Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal AssignmentLinks to an external site.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will address the following Course Outcomes:
CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1)
CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)
CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)
CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 150 points
Assignment Overview
In this assignment, you will draw upon previous assignments in the NR 505 course to create the outline of a proposal for evidence-based practice change (using the template provided). Within the outline, you will address the following:
Overview and significance of the practice issue
PICOT statement
Proposed evidence-based intervention and expected outcome
Synthesis of evidence from the literature to support the proposed intervention
Stakeholder Implications
Assignment Instructions
Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Complete the Week 7 Evidence-based Practice Change Proposal OutlineLinks to an external site. template using complete sentences.
Include a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies to support your work.
Sources should be from peer-reviewed, scholarly journals.
Sources should be current within 5 years.
Credit sources with citations and a reference list using current APA format guidelines.
Use correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling, word usage, and punctuation congruent with scholarly writing.
No direct quotes may be used in this assignment.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Assignment Criteria
Points
%
Description
Overview and Significance of the Practice Issue
15
10%
Identify and describe the practice issue
Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery
Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
PICOT Statement
5
3%
Include the PICOT statement
Include each of the required elements in the PICOT statement (P- population and problem, I-intervention, C- comparison, O- outcome, T- timeframe for outcome achievement)
Proposed Intervention and Expected Outcome
25
17%
Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention
Discuss the expected outcome that will result from the proposed intervention
Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
Synthesis of Evidence to Support the Proposed Intervention
60
40%
Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources
Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention
Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
Important reminder: This section should not be presented as an annotated bibliography; instead, a synthesis of findings should be presented that demonstrate evidence to support the proposed intervention.
Stakeholder Implications
30
20%
Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue
Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue
Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
Graduate-level Writing Style
15
10%
For full credit in this rubric category, all of the following criteria must be met:
Correct spelling and word usage
Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person
Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes
Correct APA format for the following:
Citing sources
Referencing sources
Total
150
100%
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all the above requirements.
Rubric
Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline (MAY21)
Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline (MAY21)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Criteria
15 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
13 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
12 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
11 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Identify and describe the practice issue • Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on health outcomes, nursing practice, and/or healthcare delivery • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Statement
5 pts
Accurate PICOT Statement
Accurate PICOT statement is provided with all of the following required elements included: • P- Population and Problem • I-Intervention • C- Comparison • O- Outcome • T- Timeframe for outcome achievement
0 pts
Insufficient PICOT Statement
Insufficient statement of the PICOT statement that does not portray all of the following required elements: • P- Population and Problem • I-Intervention • C- Comparison • O- Outcome • T- Timeframe for outcome achievement
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Intervention and Expected Outcome
25 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcome that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
23 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
21 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
19 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention • Discuss the expected outcomes that will result from the proposed intervention • Include sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Evidence to Support the Proposed Intervention
60 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
55 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
50 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
45 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Synthesize key ideas, facts, and themes from the review of scholarly literature sources • Explain how the findings support the proposed evidence-based intervention • Integrate a minimum of 5 original nursing research studies, current within 5 years, to support the information presented.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Implications
30 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and covered in a comprehensive manner: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
27 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included and most are covered in a comprehensive manner, but in one area the coverage is superficial: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
25 pts
Proficient
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by all of the criteria are included however content is superficial manner in two or more of areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
22 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following areas: • Describe the stakeholders who are impacted by the practice issue • Explain how each stakeholder is impacted by issue • Discuss the implications of the proposed evidence-based intervention for each stakeholder
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraduate level writing style
15 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary graduate level writing style is evident, which meets the criteria below with 0-1 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
13 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished graduate-level writing style is evident which addresses the criteria below with 2-3 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
12 pts
Proficient
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evident which addresses the criteria below with 4-5 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
11 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable graduate-level writing is evident with 6-7 errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient graduate-level writing style is evident with 8 or more errors present: • Correct spelling and word usage • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes • Correct APA format for the following: o Citing sources o Referencing sources
15 pts
Total Points: 150