Author: admin

  • Title: The Evolution of Medicare: Legislation, Changes, and Implications for the U.S. Population

    Week 4 Project
    Instructions
    Supporting Lectures:
    Review the following lecture:
    Policy Implementation Activities
    Exploring Medicare
    The U.S. created Medicare, a publically funded healthcare program, to assist people sixty-five years of age and older in obtaining healthcare services.
    Tasks:
    Summarize the legislation that introduced Medicare and the funding source for the program.
    Discuss some of the changes that have occurred in the Medicare program since its inception.
    Describe the demographics of the population covered by Medicare and identify the number of people in the U.S. covered by Medicare.
    Assess how changes in Medicare will affect the citizens and legal residents in your state. Include specific demographic information on age, race, income, etc., for your state to justify your response.
    From the Internet, review the following:
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. (2017). CMS’ program history. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/History/index.html
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. (2015). The Affordable Care Act and Medicare. Retrieved from https://www.medicare.gov/about-us/affordable-care-act/affordable-care-act.html
    Cubanski, J. (2016, December 13). What are the implications of repealing the ACA for Medicare spending and beneficiaries. Retrieved from https://www.kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/what-are-the-implications-of-repealing-the-affordable-care-act-for-medicare-spending-and-beneficiaries/
    Submission Details:
    Present your response in a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document formatted in APA style.
    On a separate page, cite all sources using APA format.
    Name your document SU_MHA6050_W4_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
    By the due date assigned, submit your work to the Submissions Area.
    Special Note
    Special Instruction/Notes for the Project:
    Research is required for each section (a minimum of/at least three different citations per section). Note that the rubric calls for explicit research. At least three separate academic citations/sources per section!
    Please show where all bullet points start and end.
    Please provide a well-defined conclusion. All submissions are to have a conclusion.
    Please provide three pages explaining and answering the questions.
    Please ensure no substantial (huge) spacing gaps between the individual paragraphs and references.
    Please make sure that the individual references are in alphabetical order.  

  • Title: The Power of the Narrative: How Social Media is Shaping Social Justice Today 1. Social media has greatly amplified the power of the narrative in promoting social change. With the rise of platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, individuals

    Week 7 Discussion Social Media and Social Justice: The Power of the Narrative.
    Respond to the following question. Include examples and support for your position.
    In week 1 we discussed the role of the slave narrative in relation to Abolition and Emancipation. First person narratives in the 1800s played an important role in social change and social justice and laid the foundation for both the modern Women’s Rights movement and the Civil Rights movement.
    1.Explain why social media plays a huge role in social change today. Can we define discussions such as #metoo as first person narratives? Why or why not?
    2.What is the impact of literature and social media on social justice and civil rights today? Do some research and find one writer who you think is having an impact on social justice and civil rights today in America. This could be a poet, novelist, playwright, journalist, blogger, Youtuber or any other social media format. Tell us about this person, their writing, their cause(s) and the impact they are having.

  • “Analyzing Risk Management Practices of a Fortune 500 Financial Institution: A Comprehensive Study and Recommendations”

    FIN-3820: RISK MANAGEMENT
    Final Project
    OVERVIEW
    For your final project, which is worth 25 percent of your total grade, you will communicate your knowledge of risk management with a research paper that analyzes the risk management practices of a real-world corporation. It should reflect both an academic and a professional viewpoint.  
    The body of your paper, not including a title page and any reference/citation pages, should be between 2500 and 3000 words. With a typical font and double spacing, this will be approximately 10 to 12 pages.
    GENERAL PLAN
    PAPER REQUIREMENTS
    Obtain the most recent financial statements of a Fortune 500 financial institution of your choice. Carefully study the audited financial statements, including the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section, with emphasis on the lending and investment practices of the company. In addition, visit relevant company websites and obtain Moody’s and S&P 500 information as supplementals. 
    Provide an analysis of the risk management processes the institution uses, focusing primarily on:
    Market risk.
    Business/operational risk (including interest rate risk and exchange rate risk).
    Financial risk.
    Liquidity risk .
    In your analysis, where necessary, create simulations from financial data obtained and cover the following:
    Identify your company’s business and regulatory environment.
    Discuss the traditional approaches used in the management of each category of risk listed above.
    Explain the applicability, usefulness, and limitations of methodologies and models covered in the course (mainly VaR, RAROC, Black-Scholes, Altman’s Z-score, Vasicek’s and Merton’s models), and determine if any is used by your company.
    Identify any risk management mistakes the company may be making or may have made in the past.
    Provide recommendations and suggestions for areas in need of improvement.
    Your paper should conform to APA style in terms of in-text citations and the list of works cited. It should display a clear style and proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It should discuss course concepts accurately and effectively. 
    GRADING CRITERIA
    Below is a list of criteria that will be used to grade your paper:
    Focus: Does the paper address the questions or tasks?
    Completeness: Are all the elements of the assignment covered? 
    Depth: Does the paper address the topic in sufficient depth? Does it include and apply the text readings and other appropriate resources? 
    Critical Thinking: Are the relevant concepts explored and analyzed at an appropriate level?
    Organization: Is the paper organized in a coherent and systematic manner?  Are headings included?
    Clarity: Is the writing clear and are the concepts articulated properly?  
    Use of Resources: Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of response to the questions (as contrasted with excessive use of quotations)? 
    References and Citations: Are the sources cited correctly (APA style) within the text? Are all sources listed correctly on the Works Cited page? Does the paper adhere strictly to APA format?
    The course site includes a link to the rubric that will be used to grade your paper.

  • Title: Exploring Bounded Rationality Perspective in Decision Making: A Critical Analysis of Relevant Literature

    The key term for this paper is (Bounded Rationality Perspective)
    Please use the articles that I have attached.
    The instructions for the assignment
    Your submission must include the following information in the following format:
    DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement. Need to include a complete  Reference after the Definition. This should be a different Reference than what was used in the rest of the submission.
    SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200-word range. Be sure to note the article’s author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.
    DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment. Also, need to evaluate the author’s credentials so that we know why we should rely on their opinion.
    Only one journal article should be used for the Summary and Discussion sections.
    REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission–in APA format. (continued) Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required.
    Any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, or AI detector, will result in zero points for the entire assignment.

  • “NGOs: Bridging the Gaps in the Paris Agreement for Environmental Justice and Climate Action”

    I need to write a Thematic Essay. must be 2000 words, with at least 10 articles used that I provided.  Follow this outline: 
    Example Outline 
    Introduction
    Hook: Start with a powerful quote or statistic about climate change.
    Background: Brief overview of the Paris Agreement and its significance.
    Thesis: NGOs play a crucial role in bridging the gaps in the Paris Agreement by promoting environmental justice and driving meaningful climate action.
    Body Paragraphs
    Role of NGOs in Advocacy and Awareness
    Topic Sentence: NGOs are instrumental in raising awareness and advocating for stronger climate policies.
    Evidence: Use Hale (2016) and Van Asselt (2016).
    Analysis: Discuss how these efforts lead to more ambitious national commitments.
    NGOs and Monitoring and Accountability
    Topic Sentence: NGOs monitor compliance and hold governments and corporations accountable.
    Evidence: Cite Peters et al. (2017) and Victor et al. (2017).
    Analysis: Explain the impact of NGO reports and campaigns.
    Capacity Building and Support
    Topic Sentence: NGOs assist vulnerable communities and nations in meeting their climate commitments.
    Evidence: Reference Falkner (2016) and Oberthür & Groen (2017).
    Analysis: Highlight specific projects or initiatives.
    Promoting Environmental Justice
    Topic Sentence: NGOs work to ensure climate policies are fair and inclusive.
    Evidence: Use Christoff (2016) and Dimitrov (2016).
    Analysis: Provide examples of successful NGO efforts in promoting environmental justice.
    Case Study
    Topic Sentence: Detailed analysis of a specific NGO’s efforts.
    Evidence: Combine insights from multiple sources.
    Analysis: Discuss strategies, challenges, and outcomes.
    Impact and Effectiveness
    Topic Sentence: Evaluating the overall impact of NGO involvement.
    Evidence: Use various metrics and indicators from sources.
    Analysis: Discuss challenges and suggest future directions.
    Conclusion
    Summary: Recap the key points discussed.
    Restate Thesis: NGOs are essential in enhancing the Paris Agreement’s effectiveness.
    Closing Thought: Reflect on the future of global climate governance and the role of civil society.

  • Title: “Building Resilience: A Disaster Recovery Plan to Address Health Disparities and Improve Access to Services in the Community”

    Develop a disaster recovery plan for the community that will reduce health disparities and improve access to services after a disaster.
    Assess community needs.
    Consider resources, personnel, budget, and community makeup.
    Identify the people accountable for implementation of the plan and describe their roles.
    Focus on specific Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.
    Include a timeline for the recovery effort.
    Apply the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) framework to guide the development of your plan:
    Mobilize collaborative partners.
    Assess community needs.
    Use the demographic data and specifics related to the disaster to identify the needs of the community and develop a recovery plan. Consider physical, emotional, cultural, and financial needs of the entire community.
    Include in your plan the equitable allocation of services for the diverse community.
    Apply the triage classification to provide a rationale for those who may have been injured during the train derailment. Provide support for your position.
    Include in your plan contact tracing of the homeless, disabled, displaced community members, migrant workers, and those who have hearing impairment or English as a second language in the event of severe tornadoes.
    Plan to reduce health disparities and improve access to services.
    Implement a plan to reach Healthy People 2020 goals and 2030 objectives.
    Track and trace-map community progress.
    Use the CDC’s Contract Tracing Resources for Health Departments as a template to create your contact tracing.
    Describe the plan for contact tracing during the disaster and recovery phase.
    Develop a slide presentation of your disaster recovery plan with an audio recording of you presenting your assessment of the scenario
    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point:
    Describe the determinants of health and the cultural, social, and economic barriers that impact safety, health, and recovery efforts in the community.
    Consider the interrelationships among these factors.
    Explain how your proposed disaster recovery plan will lessen health disparities and improve access to community services.
    Consider principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity with respect to ensuring health equity for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.
    Explain how health and governmental policy impact disaster recovery efforts.
    Consider the implications for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community of legislation that includes, but is not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, and the Disaster Recovery Reform Act (DRRA).
    Present specific, evidence-based strategies to overcome communication barriers and enhance interprofessional collaboration to improve the disaster recovery effort.
    Consider how your proposed strategies will affect members of the disaster relief team, individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.
    Include evidence to support your strategies.
    Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
    Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
    Develop your presentation with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
    Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

  • “The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: Exploring the Effects and Solutions”

    all details and rubric attached. No AI- Chat GPt. 5 pages double spaced: 1 Page Title and 1 page reference.

  • My Favorite Period: The Renaissance The Renaissance is my favorite time period and art style as I look back over all of the study guides, power points, lectures, online resources, and e-book I have studied in this class. The Renaissance,

    What time period / art style stands out to you as your favorite as you look back over all of the study guides, power points, lectures, online resources, and e-book you’ve studied in this class? Why? 
    Use a minimum of 5 works of art from your favorite period / style to fully explain your choice, offering an overall careful analysis of the period / style followed by detailed descriptions / analyses of each of the five works. Be as specific as you can about the events, places and people of your chosen time period in your discussion –this will help you determine why you chose what you did. You will need to focus on context to fully answer the prompt.
    Be sure to fully identify your top five by title, date, and artist if known, and please cite sources, whether lectures, study guides, notes, textbook or other.
    NO bullet points! Use complete sentences – this is not a formal research paper but you do have time to polish it before submitting a sloppy one-paragraph essay. To wit: each work merits a minimum of one paragraph, offering as much detail as possible. If one double-spaced typed page is approximately 250 words, I’d say this essay should aim for at least 750.

  • Title: “Exploring the Impact of Technology on Education: A Personal and Professional Perspective”

    1)     Include the following sections.
    a.      Introduction – 20 points/13%
    •       Clearly establishes the purpose of the paper
    •       Includes key points to be
    covered
    •      
    Captures the reader’s
    interest
    b.     Body of Paper – 60 points/40%
    •       Complete, well-developed discussion of key points
    •       Supports
    the purpose or main idea of the paper
    •       Logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information
    •       Ideas
    and statements are supported by three or more examples from personal and/or professional experiences
    •       Provides
    own perspectives on the topic
    that is reflective, insightful, and original
    c.      Conclusion – 30 points/20%
    •      
    Clear and concise
    •       Summarizes key points discussed in the paper
    •      
    Leaves a strong impression, message, or idea on the reader
    attached is the article choice.

  • Title: “Exploring the Use of Concept Papers in Psychology Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Researchers” “Addressing the Research Problem: A Concept Paper on Convergence and Divergence in Literature Review” “Replicating a Study: Methodology, Data Collection, and Statistical Analysis for Advancing Knowledge in Psychology”

    Submit the complete version of the concept paper for the final course assessment
    Introduction
    A research problem is identified from the literature review process and a research question is developed to address the research problem. This is the foundation to a sustainable research study. Once this groundwork is laid, framing the research topic with compatible research procedures is the last step to presenting a research concept.
    A research concept paper introduces a research topic before a full research proposal is prepared. Concept papers allow researchers to think about the research process after a thorough literature review has been drafted. Many times full research proposals fall short of demonstrating a research problem or the research topic is not well constructed. A concept-paper approach allows learners to focus on the research topic, research literature, and research problem before proposing a full study. The remaining research features are addressed succinctly to identify the procedure to be used, describe the procedure to be used, and provide a rationale for that procedure.
    The goal of completing this assessment is to become proficient at identifying appropriate research topics in the field of psychology. It is also important to understand how to approach the literature. This means that literature searches need to be coordinated to fit the topic. From there, the literature should be deconstructed. The research organization tools are great to populate with the essential components of the literature. The review is crafted from the deconstruction that takes place when using a research organization tool. This is where researchers are responsible for putting the findings together to present a new whole: a new perspective that leads to an understanding of the topic that you wish to bring forward.
    Overview
    You will submit the complete version of the concept paper for the final course assessment. If you’ve been building throughout the course, you are probably ready to submit it. It’s important that you revise the content based on instructor feedback. Use the template provided to complete the assessment. Make sure that you address the following sections, paying particular attention to the details required in length of the sections (number of paragraphs) and length of the paragraphs (number of sentences). Follow APA format.
    Concept Paper Checklist.Use this Concept Paper Checklist to ensure that you have addressed all sections required for the concept paper. Note that each section includes an abbreviated description. Consult the assessment and scoring guide for a complete overview of the requirements.
    Concept Paper Template.Make sure you are using the provided template.
    Cover Page.Your cover page includes the title of your concept paper. It also includes your name (without title or degree) and it has not been modified in any way. Do not add or delete anything else.
    The Concept Paper
    Include a brief introduction of the research topic and its significance. A road map of the organization of the paper should complete the introduction.
    BACKGROUND
    The background of your study is a modified version of your literature review. It reflects the most important points from the main ideas of the literature review. Provide a summary of those main points that highlight the gaps in the literature. This section should communicate the main ideas from the literature review, and it should restate the gaps in the literature, making a smooth transition to the research problem.
    The Background section should include three paragraphs addressing the main ideas captured in the literature review.
    Specifically, address the historical and contemporary understanding of the research problem in the first paragraph.
    In the second paragraph, address the gap in the research—where the research falls short of addressing your specific interest related to the research topic.
    The third and final paragraph needs to be a discussion of how the extension of the research concept, as a research study, would address the research problem.
    All paragraphs should include 5–7 sentences.
    RESEARCH PROBLEM
    The research problem needs to be an explicit statement about the convergence and divergence in the literature review and a clear declaration of the problem deriving from the gap in the literature. It needs to address what the research literature states we know, what the literature indicates we know, and what we don’t know, based on the published research. This should be a succinct, yet detailed paragraph of 5–7 sentences. The research problem is the impetus for the research question.
    RESEARCH QUESTION
    The research question should accurately reflect the research topic, theory, population, variables, and methodology. It should also address the research problem specifically. State it as a question. Include the hypothesis, null hypothesis, and alternative hypothesis.
    GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
    Goals and objectives are important to address in a concept paper, as they form the justification for pursuing research. Anyone reading this research concept would want to understand why this is important and what the goals would be if it were to be pursued as a full research study. State the goals of this study as if you were going to conduct it or pursue a research proposal. Think about the significance of conducting a study like this and the impact it could have (recall that significance was addressed in Assessment 2). State the goals in a succinct paragraph of 4–6 sentences. List the objectives (what the purpose of the study would be) in narrative—minimum of three objectives. You can add more if needed. Cite to support your claims.
    POPULATION AND SAMPLE
    Describe the general population, the target population (include a description of the social setting), and study’s sample. Consider this example when describing the population:
    The general population (i.e., students with disabilities).
    Target population (i.e. students with disabilities in one specific district—geographic location).
    The study sample (students with disabilities in the district that will participate in the study—actual study sample).
    Identify the sampling strategy, provide a sample size appropriate for the study design, include a justification. When describing the sample size provide evidence that the sample size is adequate for the research design. You can use the Which Statistical Analysis Should You Use? tool to find the appropriate statistical test. As a general rule of thumb, consider the following:
    Absolute Minimum: 50 cases or participants applicable to studies that use frequencies/descriptive statistics and parametric statistical tests (t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, regression analysis)—additional requirements related to the use of certain statistical analysis procedures may increase that number. Survey research = 10 subjects per survey question.
    An a-priori Power Analysis is required to justify the study sample size based on the anticipated effect size and selected design. Include this in addition to using the literature to support your choices.
    METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES
    Quantitative Research
    Define and describe quantitative research. Identify, define, and describe the research design. Provide a description of your instruments: All surveys, tests, questionnaires, experimental procedures, clinical interventions, inventories, and other data-collection tools should appear in an instrument subsection. A forecast of reliability and validity should be presented. Data collection and data analysis strategies also need to be addressed.
    Instruments. Provide a detailed discussion of the instrumentation and data collection which includes validity and reliability of the data. Describe the structure of each data collection instrument and data sources (tests, questionnaires, interviews, observations, databases, media, etc.). Specify the type and level of data collected with each instrument.
    Data Collection. Describe the procedures for the actual data collection that would allow replication of the study by another researcher, including how each instrument or data source would be used, how and where data would be collected, and recorded.
    Data Analysis. Address the what, why, and how of data analysis. Identify what statistical/non-statistical analysis would be used. Discuss why the statistical analysis is the best selection. Demonstrate how the statistical analysis was selected, align with the research question and design.
    CONCLUSION
    Restate your research topic, restate the research problem and research question, briefly discuss the significance of the topic as a potential study, summarize the key supporting ideas you discussed throughout the literature review, and offer your final thoughts on how this topic would advance the knowledge base.
    Length.The concept paper assessment should be 12–15 pages, not including references.
    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment rubric criteria:
    Competency 1: Determine the scientific merit of the professional literature.Summarize the main ideas from the literature review to inform the research concept background.
    Align the research components: the problem statement, the purpose, the research question, and the research design.
    Explain methodology and procedures.
    Competency 4: Embrace, respect, and respond to individual differences and diversity in the practice of psychology.Describe the population from which the sample will be taken that represents a sampling of the general population in a way that respects diversity, including race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, and gender.
    Competency 5: Communicate psychological concepts effectively using the professional standards of the discipline.Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
    Exhibit proficiency in writing and use of APA (7th edition) style.
    Requirements: 4-5