write an argumentative essay where you argue whether or not the drinking age should be lowered.
references: Nugent,S.G.,(Feb.10,2015).”Raising the drinking age to 21 has been a disastrous 30 year experiment”.New York Times.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving (M.A.D.D.).(Jan 26,2016). “Why 21? Addressing Underage Drinking” and “Myths and Facts about the 21 minimum Drinking Age”. www.madd.org
Author: admin
-
“The Drinking Age Debate: Should it be Lowered or Kept at 21?” The Drinking Age Debate: Should it be Lowered or Kept at 21? The legal drinking age in the United States has been a contentious issue for
-
Title: “The Intersection of Social Stratification, Gender Roles, and Race/Ethnicity”
How does the concept of social stratification related to Traditional vs Non-Traditional gender role?
How does the concept of race and ethnicity relate to traditional vs Non-Traditional gender role? -
“Voices of Inclusion: A Cultural Immersion Experience with the LGBTQIA+ Community” Introduction: The LGBTQIA+ community has long faced discrimination and exclusion in society, leading to a need for social justice work to promote inclusion and equality.
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**My chosen population is the LGBTQIA+ community so that’s the population the paper should be focused on.**
**I will provide chapters from the following textbook to you which pertain to the Gracism readings and 7 sayings discussed in the book once you are selected to work on the question**
Anderson, D. A. (2023). Gracism: The Art of Inclusion. InterVarsity Press. https://www.amazon.com/Gracism-Art-Inclusion-Bridg…
This portion of the Cultural Immersion Project Assignment includes two interviews focusing on the identified cultural group and an immersion summary experience. The first interview will be with an employee/representative of an agency/organization which engages in social justice work with your chosen population. The second interview will be with an individual or married couple from the selected cultural group to develop an understanding of what helped shape that individual’s or couple’s cultural identity. These interviews are a significant part of the immersion project as you get to hear the voices and listen to the hearts of those involved with the population.
Requirements: 2500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph. -
“Exploring the Neighborhoods of Cincinnati: A Journey through Key Landmarks” As one of the largest cities in Ohio, Cincinnati is home to a diverse array of neighborhoods, each with its own unique history and character. From the bustling streets of
using book write post
What were some of the key landmarks of various Cincinnati neighborhoods such as Norwood, Pleasant Ridge, Oakley, and Hyde Park?
Brytewave eReader (redshelf.com)
username ************************************************ password. -
“Revised Paper: Making Corrections and Following Suggestions” Introduction In today’s fast-paced world, writing has become an essential skill that is required in almost every profession. It allows individuals to effectively communicate their thoughts and ideas to others. However, writing
make corrections and follow the corrections made in the draft paper, you may shorten the paper as it states in the draft the paper is too long anyway, follow the red writing on the draft paper to help you make the corrections
-
Title: “The Debate on National Park Entrance Fees: Balancing Visitor Preferences and Park Funding” Introduction: National parks are a beloved part of American culture, providing opportunities for recreation, education, and conservation. However, the issue of entrance
Read the following article: Ostergren, D., Solop, F.I, & Hagen, K.K. (2005). National park service fees: Value for the money or a barrier to visitation? Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23, 1. Answer the following questions in essay format (introduction, supporting paragraphs, conclusion). The paper should be at least 5 pages in length:
Do visitors prefer lower entrance fees with additional fees for the services and activities? Explain.
Do people prefer entrance fees to remain with the park or be directed to the US Treasury? Explain.
How do people perceive the entrance fee paid in comparison with the benefits they receive?
How do entrance fees limit visitation to national parks? In your opinion, should they be eliminated, raised, or lowered? Explain. -
Title: Exploring Poetic Forms and Features in War Poetry: A Comparative Analysis of “Dulce et Decorum est” by Wilfred Owen and “Suicide in the Trenches” by Siegfried Sassoon
Intructions: You are required to create a multimodal presentations script (to speak) which explores the following question:
How does the poet use poetic forms and features to express his attitude and messages about war?
Explore this statement by COMPARING Dulce et decorum est by Wilfred Owen thats attached here to the poem ‘Suicide in the Trenches’ by Siegfried Sassoon (also attached)
Must: Analyse both poems (find, give evidence of the used techniques in each poem such as metaphor, irony etc )
Paragraph 1: Idea 1 (in response to the question)
Poem 1: Evidence + analysis (there should be substantial evidence and analysis). You can
include more than 1 evidence + analysis.
o Poem 2: Evidence + analysis (there should be substantial evidence and analysis). You can
include more than 1 evidence + analysis.
Paragraph 2: Idea 2 (in response to the question)
o Poem 1: Evidence + analysis (there should be substantial evidence and analysis). You can include more than 1 evidence + analysis.
o
Poem 2: Evidence + analysis (there should be substantial evidence and analysis). You can include more than 1 evidence + analysis.
Conclusion:
o A summary of your response to the question o Final comment on the poems -
“Problem Statement and Literature Review for Final Project” Title: The Effects of Tor on Internet Browsing Speed: A Revised Hypothesis and Variable Analysis Hypothesis: Revised Hypothesis: The use of Tor will result in a decrease in internet browsing speed compared to non-Tor
Overview
This assignment is another building block for the final project. Before you begin, please review the Required Resources to support your success with this milestone assignment.
Keep in mind the differences between research papers and literature reviews. Research papers take a topic and describe all aspects of that topic. They use current articles and books to support the statements in the paper. A literature review is literally a review of current articles designed to support the topic. This milestone assignment will have you focus on writing a literature review.
For example, if you want to investigate color preference among adult men and women, you first need to review current studies on the topic. Your paper needs to begin with an introduction and an explanation of the topic. You need to find peer-reviewed journal articles, like the six in your annotated bibliography. You need to summarize each article, including what the researcher found, a brief description of the research design, the advantages and disadvantages of the design, and how the article compares to other articles in the literature review. These details are essentially your annotations in your annotated bibliography. You need to add more information to each annotation, but they are a great start.
Then, you describe the gaps or pieces that are missing in the research (if any), ethical considerations (if any), and validity issues (if any). Each article becomes its own paragraph or two (or three) and then leads into the next article. Once you describe each of the articles in the literature review individually, you collectively include a discussion of any gaps in the current body of research. This is where your research comes in. You are going to be investigating an area with a gap. So, by discussing the gaps, you lead on to your research question and finally to your hypothesis and the proposed study’s key variable. Now you have a literature review that contains an introduction to the topic, a review of each current article, a discussion of where there are gaps in the current literature, your research question and how that fits into the gaps, and a concluding hypothesis. Your literature review becomes the beginning of your research report.
Prompt
In Module Six, you will submit your problem statement and literature review. In addition, you will revise your previously submitted research question and hypothesis based on the feedback from your instructor in Milestone Two.
Your work should include the following critical elements:
Problem Statement: This is a short description of the problem to be improved upon. Your introduction to the problem statement will provide your reader with the general topic of the proposal and its importance and relevance to real-world issues.
Literature Review: Include an overview of previously published work on your selected topic. This should include scholarly resources. Your literature review should consist of the following elements:
Existing Research: Summarize existing, applicable research, utilizing peer-reviewed sources, and attempts to do so in an integrated way.
Research Designs: Identify different research designs used to generate knowledge on the topic and describe how they differ.
Advantages and Disadvantages: Differentiate between research designs for their advantages and disadvantages in addressing the research question.
Appropriateness: Evaluate the appropriateness of the research designs to the research questions and determine the most appropriate design, providing justification for each.
Unknown: Summarize what is unknown or uncertain about the topic, utilizing applicable research.
Principles and Standards: Discuss the appropriateness of the data analysis procedures used in the literature as they relate to the APA’s principles and standards.
Research Question and Hypothesis
Research Question: Include the testable research question written in Milestone Two. This should be a revised research question based on your instructor’s previous feedback.
Hypothesis: Include the testable hypothesis written in Milestone Two. This should be a revised testable hypothesis based on your instructor’s previous feedback.
Variables: Describe the variables that will be measured and manipulated in the study, explaining the selection of the variables -
Title: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Anxiety Disorders: Methodology, Design, and Data Management in Research Proposal
Topic for this assignment: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders
Write a five- to seven-page paper in which you describe the methodology, design, and data management tools you plan to use in your research proposal. Define the process from the selection of participants (and stakeholders, as applicable) through data collection to data analysis, including any limitations and assumptions. Provide a detailed plan to collect and analyze data and disseminate findings. Include all ethical considerations. Your paper should give a complete description of the entire process used to conduct the study. If your proposal involves implementation of interventions, then include a program evaluation component that describes your research design.In your submission, be sure to include the following critical elements:
State the chosen research method or methods used.Are they qualitative, quantitative, or both?
Provide support of method selection. Discuss why the chosen method or methods are best for the research topic or evaluation of the intervention.Justify your choice of method, design, sampling, data collection, analysis, and overall process with logic and evidence.
Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the research design. Explain why it is the best design for the proposed study or evaluation. Support your explanation with logic and specific evidence.
Select valid and reliable data-collection tools for the research questions (and research design). If you develop data-collection tools, explain how validity and reliability will be determined.
Support the selection of the population and sampling procedures.
Describe data collection. Describe the process used to collect data from recruitment to consent to data collection. Include ethical considerations and mitigation. Include how you will handle the following:Recruiting and managing study participants
Eliminating or mitigating any chance of harm to participants
Data handling, storage, and access
Handling consent, management of data, and requests to withdraw
Protecting confidentiality for the entire life of the data
Explain the proposed data-analysis process, including the following:Any transcription and transformation of data for analysis
Use of tools, including software, for analysis
Select and provide justification for use of statistical analysis and/or processes for qualitative analysis.Discuss methods for ensuring reliability of qualitative analysis if applicable.
Explain the limitations and assumptions connected to the research.Identify potential limitations and delimiters to be used.
Describe proposed dissemination of findings. Propose how findings will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders, users, and interested parties.Include any plans for presentation and publication of material.
Fully explain the ethical considerations that apply to the proposal or intervention.Identify the ethical considerations associated with the individuals, communities, and organizations most likely to be affected by the identified gap or problem.
Articulation of Response: Ensure the submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax. -
Title: Challenging the Myth of “No History” in Early West African Societies Throughout history, there have been instances where Europeans have imposed their own perspectives and biases onto the societies they encountered. One such example is the idea that early
Some early Europeans who visited West African nations promoted the idea that the societies they encountered had no history. Many questioned whether the societies should even be referred to as civilizations. Based on your learning in Module 2, how do you respond to these ideas? Remember that your answer must include historical evidence. You may find the sections that discuss early West African kingdoms particularly useful.
Your response must be a minimum of 250 words. Please use your own words, and do not include any quotations, links, or material from outside sources like Google, Wikipedia, etc.