Identify one inelastic and one elastic good or service that you have recently purchased and relate your examples to the characteristics of the price elasticity of demand. Analyze the challenges a store would be facing to raise the price of an elastic and inelastic good.
Author: admin
-
Title: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Addressing Climate Change: A Critical Analysis of “The Paris Agreement” and “The Green New Deal”
I need a 7 page comparison/contrast essay written in proper level 7 APA format. This essay needs to be written off of a specific article i will provide. I need proper APA 7 quotes from the article
-
Title: A Comparative Analysis of Nursing Health Care in Ireland and the USA: A Windshield Survey and Clinical Experience
Research: Nursing Health Care in Ireland (minimum of 3 articles) (5 points)
Describe what you have learned about Nursing in Ireland (25 points)
Compare Ireland’s Nursing Care to the USA, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of each. (40 points)
Include a “Windshield Survey” of what you observed in your ride through the community and the time of day. Describe:
1. General appearance of the community
2. Condition and type of housing
3. Presence of stores, offices, services needed by the population
4. Individual observed (children, young adults, old etc..) (10 points)
Include your clinical experience and compare to what you have researched about Nursing in Ireland. (20 points) -
“The Impact of Globalization on Developing Countries: A Case Study of Qatar and Congo” Slide 1: Title slide – “The Impact of Globalization on Developing Countries: A Case Study of Qatar and Congo” Slide 2: Introduction –
Speech Outline – Due Wednesday, Sample Outline
Speech outline Informative Outline Topic: Globalization General purpose: To Inform Specific purpose: To explain how countries interact in the global market, and showing the good and bad sides of globalization. Thesis: Globalization is great for most nations, but it also can have a negative impact. I. Introduction a. Defining what globalization is. b. Definition of what specialization is. c. Why is specialization good for the global economy? II. Case study of Qatar a. Data of Qatar. b. How does Qatar participate in the global market? III. The threat of globalization a. The danger of having a specialized economy. b. Contributors of the global market are interdependent. IV. Case study of Congo a. Many countries cannot participate in the global market. b. Data of Congo. c. Why is Congo not as developed as Qatar? d. MNCs take advantage of Congo. V. Conclusion a. In the global market everyone contributes in a specific domain. b. Globalization has good and bad sides.
Powerpoint/Slide/Deck – For your final paper, you will conduct research into and write a 5-page informative report about a selected topic. You will also create and deliver a final 5-6 informative minute presentation on the topic. Your presentation must include power points or other visuals.
The paper must include front matter and back matter. These sections are not part of the length requirement. Front and Back matter consists of elements such as a title page, forward or preface, abstract, etc. (front matter), and works cited, bibliography, appendix, etc. (back matter). As a refresher, these concepts are covered in Chapter 14 of the text. -
“Why Does Cilantro Taste Like Soap? The Genetics Behind the Controversial Herb”
this presentation is for genetics. you have to show how and why cilantro tastes like soap or stink bugs in some people. please be very detailed and accurate as this will be presented in front of the class. use lots of pictures please
-
Title: Understanding Demographic Trends for Policymakers and its Impact on Health Care and Education Issues
The importance for policymakers, including urban planners, to understand demographic trends in their communities and nation?
Why should you be interested in such knowledge?
How might it impact your understanding of and positions on issues related to health care and education
Requirements:
Answer all parts of the discussion question completely
Your initial post must be at least 250 words long, and your peer responses must be at least 150 words long.
You are required to cite scholarly sources and your textbook in your discussion if you use information from them.
Provide APA citations and references to the textbook, scholarly sources, news sources, and popular media.
Use only scholarly sources, including; the textbook, scholarly journals, reputable news sources, and popular media. This means NO Wikipedia, online dictionaries, questionable news sources, or blogs. -
Title: “Improving Job Training through Task Analysis: A Case Study in Grocery Store Pick-Up Orders”
Consider the following scenario and answer the questions below.
A manager of a local grocery store has been receiving complaints that customers’ “pick-up orders” (i.e., orders placed online for the store to fill and have ready for customer pick up) have been filled incorrectly (i.e., with the wrong items or missing items). The employee who used to fill the orders recently retired, and therefore a new employee has begun to fill the orders. The manager thought that the new employee probably needed training in the proper way to fill and prepare customer orders. Remembering what he had learned about job training techniques in an organizational behavior management course, the manager decided to start with a task analysis of the job (i.e., filling a customer’s order). A task analysis was conducted for the job of filling a customer’s order. Based on the task analysis, here are the required steps for the job. Locate a list of requested items for customer pickup that day (using the computer database system). Print the checklist of requested items from the computer database. Walk around the store and fill a cart with items from the list by matching the item’s identification number or barcode number on the list with what is in the store. Mark off each item from the printed checklist as it is obtained from the grocery store shelves and placed in the cart. Double check to see that all items on the checklist are marked off and placed in the cart before scanning the items. Scan each item in the cart to generate a receipt for the customer and to document the item’s removal from the store (for inventory purposes). Place all scanned items in shopping bags and put the bags in the cold storage area with the receipt attached. Questions: Define “task analysis” and explain how it might be helpful in job training situations. The task analysis above produced a sequence of behaviors in which one behavior serves as the antecedent stimulus for the next behavior. What is the technical term for a sequence of behaviors like this? Explain how you will train this sequence to the new employee using either forward chaining, backward chaining, or total task presentation. Justify your choice (though answers can vary because all are valid methods). -
Title: Investigating the Relationship between Exercise and Mental Health: A Hypothesis Testing Study Introduction: Regular exercise has been shown to have numerous physical and mental health benefits, such as reducing the risk of chronic diseases and improving mood and cognitive function
For this assignment, you must develop a workable research hypothesis based on an ideal dataset that you specify. You will need to consider what statistical test to use to test your hypothesis, given your ideal data.
Your hypothesis should incorporate the following:
A brief introduction and then state your null and alternative hypotheses.
A clear description of the ideal dataset that you will use for testing your hypothesis. Describe each element of the dataset along with its unit of measure. For example, age in months, distance in kilometers, dosage in milligrams, etc. Include how you will distinguish between two samples in your dataset?
A discussion of the feasibility of collecting your ideal dataset. How will you collect it? Can it be collected ethically? Is it affordable?
A statement of the statistical test you will use to test your hypothesis with a justification for its selection. Include what level of significance you will use and why.
Add your hypothesis to the end of the paper you submitted in the previous assignment. Be sure to check for alignment between all of the research components.
Length: 2-3 page paper
References: Include a minimum of 2 scholarly references. -
“Enhancing Security Threat Detection with Grammar-Based Fuzzers: A Comparative Study of PerfFuzZ, TreeLine, SlackLine, and SlowFuzz on Linux Systems”
project title: Reaching Deeper Security Threats Using Grammar-Based Fuzzers and Understanding their Effectiveness.
github link: https://github.com/carolemieux/perffuzz
Tools must be implemented using Linux:
1. PerfFuzZ
2. TreeLine
3. SlackLine
4. SlowFuzz -
“Reflecting on Clinical Practice: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Case Presentation of a Patient with Mood Disorder” Assessment and Treatment of a Patient with a Primary Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Case Study “Assessment and Treatment Plan for a Patient with Possible Mental Health Concerns”
Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect them to the didactic learning you gain from your NRNP courses. Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.
For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined in a group setting during the last 4 weeks, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient.
TO PREPARE
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about clinical practice guidelines. Select a group patient for whom you conducted psychotherapy for a mood disorderduring the last 4 weeks. Create a Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed template provided as an exemplar and guide. All psychiatric evaluation notes must be signed by your Preceptor. When you submit your note, you should include the complete comprehensive psychiatric evaluation note as a Word document and pdf/images the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor. You must submit your note using Turnitin.
Please Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, Faculty will deduct points per the Walden Grading Policy.
Then, based on your evaluation of this patient, develop a video presentation of the case. Plan your presentation using the Assignment rubric and rehearse what you plan to say. Be sure to review the Kalturasupport resources in the Classroom Support Center found by clicking on the Help
Include at least five scholarly resources to support your assessment and diagnostic reasoning.
Ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation.
THE ASSIGNMENT
Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient.
Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video. In your presentation:
Dress professionally and present yourself in a professional manner.
Display your photo ID at the start of the video when you introduce yourself.
Ensure that you do not include any information that violates the principles of HIPAA (i.e., don’t use the patient’s name or any other identifying information). Present the full complex case study. Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Include subjective and objective data; assessment from most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; current psychotherapeutic plan (include one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy you provided); and patient progress toward treatment goals.Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What was the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment? Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms. Plan: Describe your treatment modality and your plan for psychotherapy. Explain the principles of psychotherapy that underline your chosen treatment plan to support your rationale for the chosen psychotherapy framework. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this psychotherapy session?
Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Reflect on one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
PRAC_6645_Week4_Assignment2_PT1_RubricPRAC_6645_Week4_Assignment2_PT1_RubricCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhoto ID display and professional attire5 to >0.0 ptsExcellentPhoto ID is displayed. The student is dressed professionally.0 ptsFair0 ptsGood0 ptsPoorPhoto ID is not displayed. Student must remedy this before grade is posted. The student is not dressed professionally.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTime5 to >3.0 ptsExcellentThe video does not exceed the 8-minute time limit.3 to >0.0 ptsGoodThe video exceeds the 8-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after 8 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.)0 ptsFair0 ptsPoor
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Subjective data:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent histories and/or ROS10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentThe video accurately and concisely presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodThe video accurately presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.7 to >6.0 ptsFairThe video presents the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe video presents an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, and pertinent histories and/or review of systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or subjective documentation is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss Objective data:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentThe video accurately and concisely documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Pertinent diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented, as applicable.7 to >6.0 ptsFairDocumentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain inaccuracies.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or objective documentation is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss results of Assessment:• Results of the mental status examination• Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses in order of highest to lowest priority and explain why you chose them. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe video accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Video presents at least three differentials in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient, and a rationale for their selection. Response justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe video adequately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response adequately justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe video presents the results of the mental status exam, with some vagueness or inaccuracy…. Video presents three differentials for the patient and a rationale for their selection. Response somewhat vaguely justifies the primary diagnosis and how it aligns with DSM-5 criteria.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides an incomplete, inaccurate, or unnecessarily detailed/verbose description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or assessment documentation is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss treatment Plan:• A treatment plan for the patient that addresses psychotherapy and rationales including a plan for follow-up parameters and referrals20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe video clearly and concisely outlines an evidence-based treatment plan for the patient that addresses treatment modality, psychotherapy choice with framework principles, and rationale. … Discussion includes a clear and concise follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear and concise referral plan.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe video clearly outlines an appropriate treatment plan without evidence-based discussion for the patient that addresses treatment modality, psychotherapy choice with framework principles, and rationale. … Discussion includes a clear follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion includes a clear referral plan.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately outlines a treatment plan for the patient and provides a rationale for the treatment approaches recommended…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding the follow-up plan and parameters…. The discussion is somewhat vague or inaccurate regarding a referral plan.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response does not address the treatment plan or the treatment plan is not appropriate for the assessment and the diagnosis or is missing elements of the treatment plan. … There is no discussion for follow-up and parameters. … There is no discussion of a referral plan.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation style5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentPresentation style is exceptionally clear, professional, and focused.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodPresentation style is clear, professional, and focused.3.5 to >2.0 ptsFairPresentation style is mostly clear, professional, and focused.2 to >0 ptsPoorPresentation style is unclear, unprofessional, and/or unfocused.
5 pts
Total Points: 75
PreviousNext