Author: admin

  • “Addressing Struggles and Medication in Case 3”

    No Al , no chatgbt , no plagiarism
    1-Read the question struggle and answer question
    And read case 3 answer medication

  • “Evaluating the Success of an Author’s Thesis: A Critical Book Review”

    Book Review Guide  
    History 1301/1302
    Mr. Owens  
    The assignment is to write a “critical” book review (NOTE: Critical does not mean, necessarily, negative.  What is meant by a “critical” book review is that, in addition to summarizing the book, you will also identify the author’s thesis in the book, and evaluate the success of the author in arguing that thesis.)  
    Each review should be a MINIMUM of 1200 words and a MAXIMUM of 2400 words in length, typed, and double-spaced (papers below the minimum cannot earn an A on the assignment, and papers far below the minimum will have their grade on the assignment capped at what portion of the minimum length requirement is met.  For example, a paper that is only 600 words long will receive a maximum score of 50.  Anything beyond the maximum length requirement will not be read and will not be included in your score.)  
    Use a standard 10- or 12-point font, and use 1” margins.  The book review should be carefully written, thoroughly proofed, and represent your best effort.  
    Students will review the book of their choice from the list of accepted titles owned by the Ron E. Lewis Library at Lamar State College-Orange.  
    Suggested paper organization  
    Thesis:  Identify the thesis or theses of the book.  NOTE:  The thesis refers to the author’s argument, and generally goes beyond the topic or subject matter.  What point is the author trying to make?  Demonstrate that you understand the author’s purpose in writing the book.  (This portion of the paper should be 100-300 words in length.  If you wish to think of this assignment in terms of a traditional essay, think of this as the introduction.)
    Synopsis:  Present a brief overview/summary of the book.  Discuss the methods, sources, strengths and weaknesses of the book.  Did the author propose new approaches, use any major new documents, propose new interpretations, challenge existing interpretations, rehash old information in new ways?   (This portion of the paper could theoretically be anywhere between 600 and 2200 words in length, depending on the length of the other sections; realistically, you should aim for the middle of this range.  If you wish to think of this assignment in terms of a traditional essay, think of this as the body.)  This portion of the paper should consist of several paragraphs, not just one big paragraph.
    Evaluation:  Did the author accomplish what he/she set out to do?  Was the thesis adequately supported?  Was the evidence powerful enough?  Of what value or use is the book?  Did you enjoy or like the book?  Give your judgment of the book:  interesting, boring, provocative, significant, or whatever, and explain how or why you came to that conclusion.  If you did not like the book, say so, and support your opinion with solid evidence.  (This portion of the paper should be 100-300 words in length.  If you wish to think of this assignment in terms of a traditional essay, think of this as the conclusion.)
    Note: Do not put these formal section headers into your paper.  Instead, make the entire paper flow like an essay. 

  • Title: “Understanding Over-the-Counter Treatments for Constipation: A Patient’s Guide”

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
    General instructions
    Use Canva.com or other infographic development tool of your choice to create a patient teaching aid about over-the-counter treatments for constipation.
    Include the following sections/headings. You do not have to use these exact words for headings, but they should be labeled in a way that is very clear to your instructor of which topic you are addressing.
    When should a laxative be used?
    Classification/Types (Bulk, Osmotic, Stimulant, Surfactant)
    How each type works
    Examples of each
    When should each laxative type be considered?
    When would each laxative type be contraindicated?
    Caution of laxative overuse
    Symptoms of laxative overuse
    Long-term health risks of laxative overuse
    Who is at risk?
    Possible referrals
    Format
    Readability
    Lay language for patients
    Creativity
    The format should not match the layout shown in the example image. Be creative.
    Reference(s)
    References used should be noted at the bottom of your infographic in a smaller font as not to distract from information provided but also validating the information came from a reliable source.
    References should be from either your textbook or a professional source such as American Gastroenterological AssociationLinks to an external site., Prescriber’s Digital Reference, etc. References should not be from sources such as MayoClinic, WebMD, etc. Additionally, avoid use of journal articles for this assignment as you are looking for a more global consensus than that of one journal article.
    Screen shot
    Provide a screen shot of your infographic in Canva or other platform of your choice.   
    Make sure to highlight in some manner the day and time your infographic was created like the image below.   
    The infographic you submit should match the screen shot you submit with your assignment.   
    Of course, the date your infographic is created should also coincide with the session of your submission.
    See example in the attached file

  • “Exploring the World Wide Web: An Annotated Bibliography of Educational Websites”

     
    This evaluation will hone your critical thinking and evaluative skills, give you an opportunity to support an academic argument, and collectively your work and that of your classmates – when shared –will provide for us all a wide-ranging annotated bibliography of sorts of terrific websites we can all use to continue our studies beyond this course.

  • “Improving Quality of Care: Managing Information and Legal Considerations for a Physician Group Study” Proposal for Quality of Care Comparison for Myocardial Infarction “Assessing the Role of Health Information Management Technology in the Information Lifecycle and Compliance with Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security Laws”

    Develop a section (3–5 pages) of a proposal to study whether a group
    of physicians provided quality of care related to an identified disease
    or condition and population. Include a plan to manage the information
    from collection to destruction and an analysis of legal considerations.
    INTRODUCTION:
    For this assessment and others in this course, you will assume the role
    of an office manager for a physician group. In most fields—whether it’s
    manufacturing, the service industry, or health care—organizations are
    looking for ways to improve the quality of service they provide to their
    customers. Keeping an eye on quality helps them remain competitive in
    the marketplace and stay in business. Otherwise, their customers will go
    elsewhere. This is especially true in the health care field, where
    people’s health and lives are at stake.
    PREPARATION:
    Your physician group is no different than other organizations. It
    wants to find ways to improve the quality of care it provides to
    patients. This, in turn, helps the physician group remain profitable and
    stay in business. As a result, the senior leaders of your physician
    group have asked you to provide a documentation review of the quality of
    care provided by the office. As the office manager, you are the one
    responsible for the management of the health information within the
    office and the review of information to determine whether providers met
    quality of care standards. Determining this will require you to:
    Identify a disease or condition served by the physician group.
    Determine what patient information is needed and where to retrieve it.
    Compare your overall office data to the national benchmarks.
    Typically, in the workplace, the physician group’s specialty area
    (cancer, diabetes, dermatology, et cetera) would dictate the disease or
    condition for which you would be collecting information. For the purpose
    of this assessment, however, you may select the disease or condition
    that interests you from this list:
    Asthma.
    Diabetes.
    Myocardial infarction.
    HIV/AIDS.
    Cancer.
    Select the disease or condition that is important to you and that you
    want to study. Perhaps you have the disease or condition. Perhaps a
    family member or friend does. Remember you will be working with this
    condition in the remaining course assessments.
    Now that you have determined the disease or condition you are going
    to study, you will need to begin collecting protected health information
    (PHI) for the patients treated by your physician group who have the
    condition you are studying. You will need to consider carefully the
    privacy, security, and confidentiality of the information within the
    patients’ office records. Determining how you, as the office manager,
    will maintain data security is a key aspect of your work. You are
    responsible for knowing and understanding the types of documentation,
    applications, and information systems used within and outside of the
    office. All information moves through a life cycle from creation to
    destruction. Regulations, policies, and procedures strictly control this
    ongoing process. The office manager needs to know this life cycle and
    where to locate information when it is needed.
    For this assessment, you will write a section of a proposal about how
    the documentation on previous patient care will be retrieved, from
    where it will be retrieved, and how that data will be kept secure during
    retrieval and review. Remember that you are focusing on retrieving and
    analyzing existing documentation within the office.
    For this section of your proposal:
    Identify the disease or condition and the population that will be the focus of your study.
    Explain your plan to manage this information from collection to storage to destruction.
    Identify legal considerations and a plan for compliance for the PHI you are collecting.
    In later assessments in this course, you will continue on with your
    proposal and begin to plan for how you will compare the office data you
    have collected to the national benchmarks. Remember: You will not be
    able to actually do this comparison. You are simply preparing a proposal
    for senior leaders about how you would go about performing this work.
    Please read the scoring guide for this assessment to better
    understand the performance levels relating to each criterion on which
    you will be evaluated.
    INSTRUCTIONS:
    You will not be writing the entire proposal for this assessment; only
    parts of it. You will add to your proposal in later assessments and
    complete it in Assessment 3. Be sure this part of your proposal includes
    all of the following headings, and your narrative addresses each of the
    bullet points:
    Introduction
    Identify the disease or condition from the following list for which you will review the quality of care:
    Asthma.
    Diabetes.
    Myocardial infarction.
    HIV/AIDS.
    Cancer.
    Explain the reasons for your choice.
    Information Collection
    Complete the following:
    Determine the patient population to be reviewed.
    Evaluate which information system or systems best provide the needed information.
    Determine the specific documentation you are looking for. Explicitly
    state the reasons for each and all of your choices. Be sure to answer
    all of the following questions in your narrative:
    Do you want to review information only from your office? Or do you
    also want to review information for hospital admission and/or emergency
    room visits?
    Do you wish to review all patients who have ever been treated for
    the selected condition? Or only those treated within a specific time
    frame? Will you only review patients within certain demographic
    parameters?
    What type of documentation do you want to review? This may include:
    History and physical (H&P).
    Discharge summary.
    Progress notes.
    Labs.
    Radiology.
    Others.
    Identify where you are going to find the information you need. Which
    information system or systems would be best to use, and what
    information can you collect from each system? Possibilities include:
    Pharmacy.
    Point of care (POC).
    Results management.
    Computerized physician order entry (CPOE).
    Determine the type of system or systems (financial, administrative, clinical, et cetera) you would use.
    Information Life Cycle
    Complete the following:
    Describe how you plan to manage this information from collection to
    destruction. Be sure to address all of these questions in your
    narrative:
    How will the information be collected and documented? By whom? In what context?
    How will the information be stored?
    How will you control access to the information?
    How can you ensure the documentation meets interoperability standards?
    What are the advantages and disadvantages of integrating your office information with an HIE?
    What challenges exist regarding the standardization of health information?
    When and how will the information be destroyed?
    Legal Considerations
    Complete the following:
    Differentiate between the legal aspects of health information
    confidentiality, privacy, and security, as it applies to your proposal.
    Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security.
    Determine whether the information you are retrieving requires the use of PHI.
    If not, why not?
    If so, summarize how the PHI will be used.
    Plan for how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
    (HIPAA) will impact health care personnel, policies, and procedures in
    your proposal.
    Conclusion
    Briefly summarize the value of the documentation review you are proposing to be performed.
    ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
    Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
    Written communication: Your paper does not need to
    be in APA format. It does need to be clear and well organized, with
    correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, to support orderly exposition of
    content.
    Title page: Develop a descriptive title of approximately 5–15 words. It should stir interest yet maintain professional decorum.
    References: Include a minimum of two citations of peer-reviewed sources in APA format.
    Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references page.
    Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    COMPETENCIES MEASURED:
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your
    proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide
    criteria:
    Competency 1: Determine stages of the information lifecycle embedded within health information management technology functions.
    Apply steps of the health care information life cycle.
    Competency 2: Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security.
    Differentiate between required confidentiality and security measures.
    Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security.
    Competency 3: Assess system applications used to operationalize health information.
    Evaluate which information system or systems best provide needed information.
    Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly,
    professional, respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of
    others, and is consistent with the expectations for healthcare
    professionals.
    Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization.
    Apply proper APA formatting and style to references and citations.

  • “Target’s Use of Management Information Systems and Financial Accounting for Business Success”


    My selected company is Target
    Chapters 12
    MIS 11th Edition. Author: Hossein Bidgoli. Publisher Cengage.
    Fundamentals of Financial Accounting, 7th Edition Authors: Fred Phillips and Robert Libby and Patricia Libby. Publisher McGraw Hill.

  • “Transforming Justice: The Evolution of Inspector Javert in Les Misérables”

    Inspecter Javert: (Voice of logos with all justice and no merey. This judge archetpe law enforcer transforms from son of conviors to jail warden to inspector to spy to merciful man to
    self-imposed criminal)
    Specifications/Grading Rubric: Verify that all specification requirements below are met BEFORE submitting the final paper. These specifications will also serve as a rubric when assessing/grading the final paper.
    • MLA typed format (refer to the sample paper on the Cerritos College Library homepage)
    • 1500 words MINIMUM. (WORDCOUNT WILL APPEAR ON TURN IT IN. IF IT IS LESS THAN 1500 WORDS, IT WILL NOT PASS.)
    • Times New Roman Font; 12 inch point size; double spaced, title centered
    • Your name, professor’s name, course number, and date in upper left hand corner, 1 inch from the top
    • Your last name and page number on all pages ½ inch from the top in the upper right hand corner
    • Cite film’s title in italics, Les Misérables in the introduction for primary source citation.
    • All direct quotes must be correctly cited in the text. Be sure to add at least 4 quotes from the film in your analysis. For direct quotes, please cite per the MLA format:
    Jean Valjean reveals, “When you love another person, you see the face of God” (Les Misérables).
    • Use the objective voice, 3ª person formal voice. (No: I, We, Our, Us, You)
    • Essay must be FINAL COPY QUALITY: little to no typos, meet word count requirement, and be correctly MLA formatted. Basically, the final paper must be very thoroughly proofread.
    • No Works Cited page needed.

  • “The Future’s Interpretation of a Contemporary Artifact: A Room in a Modern Home” Title: “Uncovering the Mysteries of a Modern Home: An Archaeological Analysis of a Contemporary Room”

    Motel of the Mysteries is a well-known book among archaeologists (see basic description in Smith, 2009). This humorous (now sadly out of print) book takes a look at how an archaeologist of the future might look at a late 20th century roadside motel. While our artifacts make sense to us, how might they preserve and be interpreted by future archaeologists? Choose one room in your home, workplace, community and describe one artifact for us, then explain some potential uses of that artifact.  See if folks in class can guess your artifact!
    Smith, S. (2009). Motel of the Mysteries. The Society for Georgia Archaeology. Retrieved from: 
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100901184503/http://thesga.org/2009/01/motel-of-the-mysteries/

  • Title: Annotated Bibliography and Study Introduction: Exploring the Effects of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health

    nnotated Bibliography: Section one should contain an annotated bibliography with five peer-reviewed
    academic articles that relate to the proposed study. These peer-reviewed articles must be (1) empirical
    studies and (2) published in academic journals. Keep in mind that other sources outside of these
    requirements can be used for the brief introduction. This section should be written like a standard
    annotated bibliography (citation and summary) and all citations should be in APA-7 format. Students
    may not plagiarize or use generative AI! Please note that ChatGPT and similar AI programs generate
    nonexistent studies. An example annotation can be found on the course Canvas page.
    Study Introduction and Description: Section two should begin with a brief introduction to your proposal.
    This brief (1-2 paragraphs) introduction should include pertinent background information for your study,
    setting up your proposal nicely. Any information not deemed general knowledge requires a citation,
    please provide an in-text citation if the source is already included in the annotated bibliography or
    provide the full citation in a reference page at the end of your proposal. This section should include 2 – 5
    additional sources beyond what is included in the annotated bibliography. This section should also
    include your research question(s) and hypothesis(es), if applicable. When including a hypothesis,
    students should identify if the hypothesis is non-directional or directional and the directionality of the
    hypothesis. Last, this section should include the identification and explanation of the study’s purpose
    (exploratory, explanatory, evaluation or descriptive as well as pure or applied), time dimension (if
    longitudinal, which type), and either a quantitative or mixed methods approach.
    **For the draft – if the hypothesis is directional, the directionality is not needed. We have not discussed
    this yet. Students may attempt to include this and will not be penalized for doing so**
    All other elements (see rubric), including a reference page, should be incorporated.