Author: admin

  • “Uncovering the Causes of Ineffective Presentations: A Study on Factors Affecting Student Engagement”

    It is a communication skills work, concerns writing term paper based on Factors leading to a poor presentation to students

  • “The Timeless Relevance of Epic of Gilgamesh: A Comparative Analysis with Modern Media”

    The powerpoint instructions are as follows.  
    Compare the story,  Epic of Gilgamesh,   to a TV show, song, movie, or play explaining how the story relates to it. How are they similar. 
    Then explain how they both, The Epic of Gilgamesh and which ever song, movie, tv show, or play that is chosen, relates to  society today. 
    The slides should go as follows:
    First slide: Title slide
    Second slide: Summary of story 
    Third slide: Summary of story
    Fourth slide: Your choice (religion, racism, sexism,
    etc.) and why
    Fifth slide: Continuation of your explanation.
    Sixth slide: Song, movie, play, or television show that
    you will use to compare
    Seventh slide: Explanation of your comparison
    Eighth slide: Explanation of your comparison
    Ninth slide: How does this connect with the present,
    and why is it important to use the past to understand the present?
    Tenth slide: Continuation of your explanation.
    Eleventh slide – Poem – a short rhyming poem talking about all three things. 
    Twelfth slide: Works Cited page (see OWL Purdue MLA
    format for assistance) 

  • “Analyzing the Impact of Cultural, Political, and Economic Differences on a Saudi Multinational Company in the GCC Region”

    Learning Outcomes:
    Knowledge:
    1.3 Explain the forces driving and evaluating the impact of globalization:
    Skills:
    2.1 Analyse the effects of culture, politics, and economic systems in the context of international business
    2.2 Identify the major components of international business management:
    Values:
    3.1 Carry out effective self-evaluation through discussing economic systems in the international business context
    Report Writing
    In this assignment, you will conduct an in-depth analysis of any publicly listed Saudi Company that operates in GCC. Your aim is to investigate how the selected MCN deals with the challenges and opportunities it is facing due to cultural, political, and economic differences in any of the country it operates. To complete this assignment, follow the tasks highlighted below: Present the study report with clear Introduction and Conclusion including your own views. (minimum words: 300, marks: 2)
    Using SWOT analysis, analyze the external and internal environment of your selected company. (minimum words: 700, marks: 5)
    Analyze the political, economic, cultural and legal challenges the company currently faces in any of the country it operates (select one country in which the company operates for this analysis).(minimum words: 300, marks: 2)
    References: Your paper must include at least five (5) external sources such as academic papers, reputable business databases, company websites, or government websites.(marks: 1)
    Strengths: Explain the strengths of the selected company; Weaknesses: Describe the areas of weakness in the company’s operations; Opportunities: Examine factors that may improve the company’s chances of success; Threats: Discuss the external threats to the business company’s success.
    Important Notes:
    This is an individual assignment. The paper should be between 1,300-2,000 words.
    All references must be cited using APA format. This includes both in-text citations and the reference list at the end of the document.
    Originality, Similarity and Plagiarism Check: Your work must be original. All papers will be submitted through SafeAssign software to check for similarity and plagiarism. Any instance of academic dishonesty will result in a grade of zero for the assignment. No exceptions and no second chances!
    Answers Answer-
    Answer-
    Answer- Answer-

  • Professor & Mayor Standard Part One Professor & Mayor Standard Part One: Creating Standards for Agreements

    Professor & Mayor Standard Part One
    Open and read the document called Standards Download Standards. Once done, create two standards using Agreement #1 and Agreement #2 below.  For each agreement create at least four terms with one benchmark for each term. Use the document called Professor & Mayor Standards Download Professor & Mayor Standards to organize your answer. When done, paste your table in the textbox as a reply to this post.
    Agreement #1. You can be my professor if …
    Agreement #2. I will vote for you for mayor if …

  • “The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: A Critical Analysis of Current Research and Perspectives”

    You will be required to consult at least 2 outside sources (from GALILEO) in addition to the textbook. The paper should be from 1,000-1,200 words (4 to 6 pages, not including the four-line heading, the essay title, or the Works Cited page) long and quote and/or paraphrase the outside sources. You will need a Works Cited page as well.

  • Title: “Communication Breakdown: An Analysis of an Ineffective Document in the Workplace”

    choose a short document (no more than 500-750 words) from your workplace or personal life in which communication was not successful. It could be a longer email, a brief report, or some other document you received. You may want to review the instructions for M1.5 Assignment: Evaluation of an Existing Document before beginning this activity because you will use the same document you choose here for your assignment.
    Your initial discussion response should address, at minimum, the following main points:
    Provide a description of the document.
    Identify the type of document, medium, sender, receiver/audience, and intended purpose.
    Explain how and why the document was not effective and what ultimately happened because of the unsuccessful communication.
    Briefly describe what you would do differently in the communication and why those changes are required.
    Use option 1 from the attached file                                                               

  • Title: Interview with a Senior Healthcare Administrator: Developing and Utilizing Leadership Skills

    Overview
    You will arrange to interview a senior-level healthcare administrator. The goal of the interview is to understand how the healthcare administrator develops and uses their leadership skills. You are encouraged to audiotape your interviews so that you can have a detailed record of the session. Please be sure to obtain permission for the recording. It is OK if the person does not allow it. Also, please understand that this project can provide you with access to senior executives that you would not normally be able to meet. Make your time with the executive count to showcase your strengths.
    The final project should be typed and submitted by the due date. Please utilize a question and answer format using the questions provided. However, your assignment does not have to be limited to these questions. Feel free to add questions as the situation warrants.
    Interview Guidelines
    Your interview should include but is not limited to the following questions:
    Describe your academic background.
    Describe your professional experience.
    Is leadership an act, a process, or a skill?
    What is your definition of leadership?
    What are the top three qualities that a leader must possess to be successful?
    How would you describe your leadership style?
    How important is culture to your organization? Describe why.
    How would you describe the culture of your organization?
    Are you comfortable with this culture, or do you want it to change? If so, how?
    How does your management team communicate with each other?
    Decision-making is an important part of leadership. What steps do you take before you make a decision?
    Have you ever had a personal value that conflicted with your organization? Please describe and explain how you handled it and why you handled it that way.
    If you were to suddenly leave your organization, what would people say was your “legacy?”
    Assignment Guidelines
    To present what you learned from your interview, you will write a paper utilizing a question and answer format to summarize the interviewee’s answer to each question. For example, you would have:
    Question: What is the most challenging aspect of your job?
    Answer: Provide a summary of the interview’s answer. You do not need to transcribe their exact response.
    At the end of the interview summaries, write a reflection that makes connections between the responses and the concepts discussed in class.
    Use double-spacing and 12 point font (Times New Roman) black ink, and include 1” margins on all sides.
    Write a minimum of 4 pages.
    Utilize the APA (7th ed.) format.
    The paper should have a cover page with your name, topic, course name, and current semester.
    This assignment is worth 200 points and will be graded according to the following guidelines:
    Completion of questions assigned
    Addition of other questions
    Length of interview questions reported and the follow-up
    Reflection on the interview answers
    Level of identification/discussion of leadership principles, concepts, or styles from class discussions and readings
    Organization of the paper
    Appropriate usage of formal language and grammatical/mechanical conventions
    Length of paper

  • Title: The Journey to Personal Fulfillment: Nietzsche’s Perspective on the Path to Heaven

    Your response to this prompt must be at least 50 words.
    “The path to one’s own heaven always leads through the voluptuousness of one’s own hell.” – Friedrich Nietzsche.
    What do you think Nietzsche means by this statement?
    no AI or plagerisim

  • Exploring the Relationship of Dramatic Genre: A Discussion of Northrop Frye’s Archetypal Theories Title: “Uncovering the Layers of Dramatic Genre: Analyzing Northrop Frye’s Archetypal Theories”

    Our discussion this week will be about Northrop Frye’s archetypal theories as expressed in the two Frye essays included in your Study Folder. Frye’s theories are some of the most exciting and insightful in the whole history of criticism, so I am sure you will find them engaging, even mind-blowing.  Now, the notion of the universal unconscious as expressed by Karl Jung and Joseph Campbell runs counter to Christian thought, so you should not let yourself get caught up too much in the archetypal theory espoused by Frye, whose theories align with those of Jung. However, this same theory led Frye to postulate the relationship of genre to itself, which is where our interest should be focused. Frye suggests that the four basic genres—comedy, romance, tragedy, and satire/irony—correspond to the four seasons—spring, summer, autumn, and winter. What’s more, he places these “seasons” of genre on a circular table that allows for all possible genre types, which he would suggest are nothing more than an infinite blending of these four basic dramatic forms.  
    YOUR PROMPT: Based on your readings and the provided graph, what are your thoughts about Frye’s insightful attempt to explain the relationship of dramatic genre? Can you see and agree with his ideas? Or do you think he simply missed the mark? Where on this circle might you place your favorite plays? (Few plays would be fully tragic or ironic, so they must fall on the circle between two of these points.) Also, if there is a circular movement around Frye’s circle—moving from tragedy to comedy to romance to irony—then would there also be possible movement up and down the spokes of the wheel toward the center point? If so, if this even makes sense, what elements of the drama might be amplified by such a move? What kind of genres lie in this direction? An even more profound question might be, what lies at the center of the wheel? If this were a graph in mathematics, we would be moving up and down the X (or Y) axis, and the X and the Y are generally stand-ins for other values. And since he compares his wheel to the cycles of nature, what might this suggest about the center of the wheel and what lies on its spokes? (There is no right or wrong answer to this. Your professor is unsure of what we might find by exploring such a paradigm, but he hopes there is something there to discover.)
    You may jump into this conversation at any point. Feel free to chase a new line of thought based on the reading. Choose what speaks most strongly to you and get started.  
    Remember, we are looking to build a scholarly framework in which to position our opinions and choices.  You should incorporate source material (assigned or otherwise) into your posts as much as possible and always include a Works Cited list at the bottom of your post. Please make sure your posts conform to MLA format. You should post one initial post (200-300 words)