Author: admin

  • “The Impact of Literature on Government and Society: A Reflection on [Book Title]” “Reflecting on Lessons Learned: A Guide to Writing a Reflection Paper on a Book”

    15 points INTRODUCTION – Includes necessary information about the book’s background (author, etc.) – Draws in the reader with a “hook” – Describes the book’s value and importance in a historical sense with a government spin.. another words how did this book effect the government structure and the people who reside in the country ? Make sure you give 3 examples.
    15 points ORGANIZATION – Paragraphs have well-conceived topic sentences and clear transitions, and the narrative has structure.
    30 points Addresses the main themes and arguments in the book – Evidence and examples (including quotations) are detailed, accurate, and appropriate. Analysis demonstrates critical thinking and insight mention any particularly interesting or memorable points or passages and support your opinions with references to the book. 
    – Background information about a book consists of the historical, sociological, economic, and other circumstances that may have influenced or contributed to its publication. This information may have some bearing on the book’s importance or interest. You are writing for other people who are not in the course and are therefore unfamiliar with the subject. 
    Minimum of 3 outside resources to help you with your paper. NO Wikipedia !! you can use published articles, .org web sites (these are non-profit so they try to stay in the middle of the road). If you are unsure email me to help you 😊 
    15 points in your evaluation, you might reflect on how the book relates to your course. Consider what issues, ideas, or institutions the author criticizes or defends. Also, evaluate how well the author has added to your knowledge and understanding of the subject, particularly how it supplements the ideas in the classroom/classmates and the views of your instructor. 
    10 points Uses a professional tone and sophisticated language – Speaks with authority and awareness of audience- another words you need to think on that upper level, if the wording sounds generic…your paper won’t capture the audience.
    10 points Citations are present and placed appropriately in text. Make sure you include page numbers, etc. 
    5 points Includes page numbers – Text is double spaced, in 12 pt. Times New Roman – Uses standard 1” margins – Is of the required length.
    1200 words the citation page and intro- PAPERS THAT ARE LESS than 1200 words will loose 10-30 points
    Here are a few tips on How to Write a Reflection Paper on a Book
    A reflection paper is a piece that focuses on your thoughts about a book or any other related material and so it has to be written in the most appealing and contemplative manner. To successfully write a great piece on your book, keep in mind that, a reflection paper is not based on mixed thoughts of other people. Your own thoughts are necessary for your reflection paper to be fruitful. 
    Everything that you include in your paper should incorporate your insight, observation or opinion. Like any other papers, your reflection paper should include introduction, body and conclusion sections. If stuck or having challenges on comprehending, you can find out more from professional writers, tutors or friends who have written reflection papers before. These are personal and subjective papers, and you have to uphold an academic tone in the whole paper and ensure that it is thoroughly and cohesively planned. 
    Here are a few tips to help you know how to write a reflection paper on a book with ease: 
    Determine your main themes– In the notes that you make from the book that you have read, sum up the experience or lesson in a number of sentences that are descriptive and straightforward. Identify why the material will stand out and what you have learned from it. Keep track of your main points or experiences from the book you have read, then list personal response to the points you have amassed and describe how this response is helpful to your paper.
    Ask yourself a few questions to guide you on your response– If you find it hard to gauge your own feelings on the topic of choice or your own response, try to ask yourself a few questions about the experience or lesson and how it relates to you. Excellent sample questions may include. 
    Does the experience or lesson affect you socially, emotionally, or spiritually?
    Does the experience or lesson from the book leave you with many questions? 
    Do the ideas that you obtained from the book contradict or back up each other? 
    Did the author of the book fail to address any essential issues?
    You have to keep it short and impressive
    – Do not include more content that cannot be backed by topic ideas or evidence accessible from the book. You will easily lose credibility from your readers if you present false information in your paper.
    Ensure you reveal details in a wise manner– Due to subjective feelings and opinions that accompany reflection papers, it is wise to not reveal personal things learned from the book. Ask yourself whether it is necessary or not to include a few in the paper.
    A Step By Step Guide on How to Write a Reflection Paper on a Book 
    The idea of a reflection paper on a book is to describe your reactions and analysis to your reading or lessons learned from the book. Here are steps on how to go about it; 
    Come up with a clear and remarkable introduction.
    Writing a reflection paper differs from just slapping some thoughts on a paper. You have to create a clear and impressive introduction. Here you have to describe your expectations and initial attitude from reading your book of choice. Create an informative statement about the lessons or experiences gained to appeal to the reader of your paper. In the final sentence of your introduction, sum up your feelings or response on what you gained from the book in a thesis statement that outlines the core points you will talk about in the rest of the paper.
    Elaborate on your reactions to the subject of the book. You need to cover a min of 3 chapters in the book.
    Talk About more on your ideas and do not generalize things regarding your lessons or experience. Analyze all your thoughts and experiences and give examples to show how you have reached your conclusions on the topic. In addition, use direct quotes from the book to support your ideas or observations. Providing your readers with examples to back up your topic will help them see the importance of what you have learned from the book. 
    Apply what you have collected from the book.
    Your conclusion should sum up for readers of your reflection paper on how you plan to use the new knowledge acquired and how it applies to your life. Put all your critical thinking skills at test in this section as you summarize what you have acquired from reading your book. Depending on the topic that you decide on from your book of choice, what you incorporate in your piece should leave readers with a clear statement of your lesson’s value to your life. 
    Edit and proofread your reflection paper.
    It is also wise to find out what should be included in your paper or not. Editing is never easy as it requires time and a focused mind. You have to go through your paper and get rid of grammar, punctuation and spelling flaws. Have your friend read aloud the final draft and single out any areas that are not clear.

  • “Analyzing Social Behavior through the Lenses of Social Theorists: A Comparative Study of Durkheim, Du Bois, Weber, and Hochschild”

    For your final essay for this class, you must write a 6-8 page research paper on a topic of your choosing.  This essay must consider at least two of the social theorists discussed over the course of the semester (or another, related social theorist, with instructor’s approval) and connect their work to some element of human social behavior.   
    For example: you might choose to discuss a social ritual such as marriage and analyze it using the social theories of Emile Durkheim and Judith Butler.  Or, you might choose to write about a particular social situation, like a workplace, drawing on the work of Karl Marx and Erving Goffman.  The specific situation chosen matters less than the connections you are able to draw between it and the theorists we have read in the class.  Papers will be judged, primarily, on your ability to demonstrate that you know how to apply the work of social theorists we have read to specific sociological data, and that you are able to compare and contrast theorists effectively. 
    The final paper is due at the end of the semester, May 22nd at 5pm.  It will be graded according to the following rubric: 
    •    Description of relevant concept from social theorist, drawing 
on relevant quotes, summaries, and secondary scholarship 
where appropriate.           20 points each 
    •    Careful, accurate description of the social phenomenon you
are analyzing with this essay.                                                                                           10 points 
    •    Analysis of the situation through the combined lenses of your
 chosen social theorists.                                                                                                 40 points 
    •    Proper essay structure, citations, formatting and spell-checking,
and overall care in presentation.                                                                                10 points 
    Papers should have a formal thesis statement at the beginning, should describe the project and the structure of the paper itself, and should be well-structured internally, using signpost statements to mark the development of your argument.
    Some theorist discussed is Émile Durkheim, Du Bois,Max Weber ,Arlie Hochschild.

  • Title: “The Impact of Alexandat Abramov v Minister for Foreign Affairs (No 2) (2023) FCA 1099 on Administrative Law: An Analysis of Key Issues and Implications”

    Research paper on case Alexandat Abramov v Minister for Foreign Affairs (No 2) (2023) FCA 1099 on Administrative Law. Please read this case it is online and answer the question using case law and other research papers. Citing must be done in AGCL , a record of the resource must be put into a table

  • “Boosting Workday Success: Incorporating Healthy Habits into Your Daily Routine”

    What are some good weekday habits to incorporate in your daily life to assist being successful at work?
    Examples: Coffee/ caffeine, exercising regularly (I do spinning at Cycle bar and walk daily), short breaks throughout the day, listening to music, etc. 
    *please note I am a provider contractor at a health care insurance company and I am in need of assistance for a great presentation. Thank you in advance!*

  • Title: Coping with Placement Cancellation or Limited Hours: Strategies and Resources for Students Slide 1: Introduction – Introduce the topic of placement cancellation or limited hours due to unforeseen circumstances – Explain the purpose of this presentation

    at least 15 slides with speaker notes. YOu have to work on OPTION B – if you did fewer than 35 hours or no placement at all (due to cancellation of placement or other circumstances) Please do quality work because my teacher is very strict only use Harvard references. Please follow attached file very carefully.
    if you need anything else please let me know.

  • Title: “Addressing Data Gaps: Obtaining Census Tract-Specific Type 2 Diabetes Rates for White, Black, and Hispanic Populations”

    Imagine that you are part of a community health assessment and planning group. Your group believes it is important to know the rate of Type 2 Diabetes for White, Black, and Hispanic people in the three census tracts being assessed. However, the only publicly available data are the county statistics.
    How would you respond to the group’s request for information about Type 2 Diabetes for White, Black, and Hispanic people in the three census tracts?

  • Reflection on “The Power of Vulnerability” by Brené Brown In her TED talk, “The Power of Vulnerability,” Brené Brown discusses the importance of embracing vulnerability in order to live a wholehearted and fulfilling life. She shares

    After you watch all of the videos, give your reflection and opinion about what you have learned.
    Write 150-250 words and provide the following information:
    Choose 1 of the videos
    Name the Video and the Presenter
    What did you learn from the video? 
    What interested you most? Why?
    Which do you think would be the best to show during a parent/caregiver information night at middle or high school and why?
    Do not write more or less than is assigned. Points will be deducted for not meeting minimums and exceeding word counts.

  • Title: The Battle for Public Opinion: A Comparative Analysis of Extinction Rebellion’s Press Release and News Coverage in Right and Left Wing Newspapers

    Brief: Choose ONE of the questions below, and drawing on relevant academic literature, conduct an original analysis on your chosen example of political communication in an essay of no more than 1,200 words.
    The introduction should briefly outline the specific piece of political communication that you are analysing, and the sample you have chosen, e.g. which scandal, which specific newspapers, within what date-range.  
    The analysis should draw on reading from the reading lists for the relevant topics in order to explain the analytical concept(s) that you will use (e.g. populism, the protest paradigm, etc.).  You may also use more specific academic texts found through NUsearch, but your analysis of the political communication case study must be your own original work.
    If analysing a sample of press coverage, please use the Nexis database to identify a coherent but manageable sample of newspaper articles (around 7-15 articles, depending on length).  I have given you some hints about how you might do that in the notes on the relevant questions.  Please see Moodle for further details of how to use Nexis.  
    Your analysis should make relevant observations of your chosen piece of communication, including evidence (brief quotes, references to specific news articles and/or webpages) that allow you to answer the question set.  
    1. Political publics
    Choose one press release from Extinction Rebellion’s press page* and compare it with coverage in at least one right/conservative newspaper (e.g. Daily Mail, Times, Telegraph) and one left/liberal newspaper (e.g. Guardian, Independent, Mirror)**.  How do they compare in their presentation of cause and tactics, and accordance with the protest paradigm?
    * You may choose a different protest movement press page with the approval of the module convener, and if located in another country the relevant newspapers
    **Please choose comparable newspapers – i.e. two tabloids or two quality/broadsheet newspapers
    2. Persuasion and deliberation
    Analyse a recent broadcast* or parliamentary (or equivalent, e.g. congressional in the US) debate to assess the extent to which it uses deliberative or plebiscitary the argumentation.  
    * E.g. UK examples include the Conservative party leadership election debates, an episode of BBC Question Time, BBC Radio 4 Any Questions, or perhaps an episode of The Moral Maze or Across the Red Line that focuses on a broadly political question.  Consult the module convenor if you are unsure whether your chosen example is appropriate. 
    3. Personalisation, populism and celebrity politics
    Analyse EITHER one recent substantial speech by a populist political figure (a full transcript) OR one social media account of a populist leader (at least 20 recent posts).  Explain why you define that figure as a populist and identify the populist tropes in their communication.  Evaluate the significance of this populist communication within the national politics of their country.  
    4. Contested truth claims
    Analyse a fact-checking or OSINT verification* assessment of a political claim and compare its use of evidence and interpretation to mainstream news reporting of the claim.  
    * E.g. Full Fact (UK), Channel 4 News (UK), Politifacts (US), BBC Verify, or Bellingcat.
    5. Scandal, truth and trust
    Analyse one recent mediated political scandal in terms of themes from the literature.  How did the news media justify the story’s political significance in relation to the public interest or morality, and to what extent did the accused manage to resist or deflect public opprobrium? 
    6. Human interest
    Analyse the use of personal narratives and emotion in communication of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal*.  Compared to more ‘objective’ accounts of the controversy, how effectively do they convey the political significance of the events?

  • Title: Addressing Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System: The Need for the Smart Sentencing Adjustments Act PART 1: A. The current political climate regarding racial disparities in the criminal justice system is highly contentious. While

    PART 1
    Social Issue/Policy Problem: Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System
    Legislation: S.1342 – Smart Sentencing Adjustments Act
    A. What is the current political climate regarding your issue? Is it contentious, or is there broad consensus?
    B. How feasible is your proposed policy reform given the political climate? What attributes of the proposed reform do you think can help to enable greater political feasibility?
    PART 2
    Imagine that a policy maker is working on the social problem you are addressing (i.e. the president, a council member, a senator, a school board official) in Table 1. It’s your job to draft a 1-2 page policy brief where you make your case for the policy reform. This document should be submitted as a single-spaced PDF that is visually appealing and organized according to the structure described below.
    Use the following structure for your policy brief:
    Policy Recommendations Which specific steps or measures should be taken (and by whom) to realistically and feasibly implement the chosen option?
    Are you going to close the paper with a closing call to action?

  • “The Madness of Montresor: Exploring Borderline Personality Disorder in Poe’s ‘The Cask of Amontillado’”

    Montresor suffered from metal illness (Borderline Personality Disorder) which caused him to 
    react extremely to an insult by a friend.