Brisk Essay Writers

Author: admin

  • Title: Implementing WE CARE Intervention: Project and Resource Management Strategies

    WE CARE is a relatively simple intervention that has two key components:
    1. The WE CARE Survey
    2. Community Resource Information Sheets
    The WE CARE Survey
    The WE CARE Survey instrument is designed to: (1) identify unmet social needs (e.g., childcare, employment, and housing) by self-report (e.g., “Are you employed?”), and (2) using a family-centered approach, determine whether parents would like assistance with any of their unmet needs (e.g., “If no, do you want help?”). The “would you like help?” question avoids the common screening pitfall of presuming that those who have a need want assistance addressing it. Respondents can indicate whether they want help by marking “Yes,” “No,” or “Maybe Later.” Critically, the “Maybe Later” option ensures parents know they can always access resources in the future if they are not ready to now.
    Families who report wanting help will be provided with locally developed Community Resource Information Sheets (see below).
    Community Resource Information Sheets
    Families who report having a need and wanting help will be provided with the corresponding WE CARE Community Resource Information Sheet. These 1-page information sheets will list community resources (e.g., food pantries) and their contact information (e.g., telephone number) for each specific WE CARE need (e.g., food insecurity). Because community resources vary widely depending on neighborhood, city, and state, WE CARE information sheets will be developed specific to the resources available here at Downstate. The sheets will also need to written at a reading level suitable for our Pediatric clinics’ families.
    As the newly appointed Project Manager, you are charged in helping to get this project off the ground. Using the material provided in the hypothetical above (and supplementing to it as needed), please respond to the questions posed below. Your response should be no longer than 500 words. Please answer the following questions in your short paper:
    1. Explain the role of project and resource management and Budget Tools. Describe the role and at explain at least two principles of project and resource management and how you might use resource management or budgetary tools to facilitate the work of a project manager. Use: https://www.projectmanagementdocs.com/project-documents/#axzz7ZbHeitwE .
    2. Gantt Chart. Complete a Gantt chart that identifies the tasks to be completed and their respective timeline for the initial six months. You can find an example of Gant Charts that you could use available here: 

  • Title: “A Critical Evaluation of the Methodology and Sections of a Business Article: A Case Study on Data Collection and Presentation of Results”

    For this assignment you are required to find an article in the field of business and
    critically evaluate the different sections and methodology used. You will need to
    critically discuss each section and then provide your thoughts and ideas on the
    methodology, data collection and presentation of the results. Your critical evaluation
    essay should be approximately 2500 words +/- 10%.

  • “Exploring Core Geographic Concepts Through Film: A Comparative Analysis of Dirty Dancing and Dirty Pretty Things”

    Final Critical Analysis: A 5-6 page (not including bibliography) double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font paper that addresses one following options:
    1)  A comparison and contrast of two of the previous discussion board films using one or more core geographic concepts discussed throughout the term. Students may for example choose to:
    Compare and contrast the portrayal of gender, class, and sexuality in Dirty Dancing and Dirty Pretty Things
    Compare and contrast the role of gendered social expectations and classed/raced stereotypes in Dirty Dancing and Smoke Signals
    Compare and contrast the different understandings of personhood and/or futurity that are deployed in Bladerunner and Dirty Pretty Things
    Compare and contrast the role of nature in Smoke Signals and Bladerunner
    Another combination of films watched during class and core concepts of the student’s choosing
    Each paper requires a minimum of three academic references, two of which must come from readings assigned for this class (all three may as well), and a minimum total of 4 references, including academic and non-academic. Academic references are books published with academic publishers or peer-reviewed journal articles, not websites, newspaper articles or other beyond what I have laid out here. These other sources of information may be used but do not count towards the minimum number of academic references needed. Information gathered from websites MUST have author details. If the page doesn’t have any author information, you cannot use it in your paper. I greatly encourage all papers to have a thesis statement structure and format, however given that this is a first year course it is not strictly required. Please visit the writing center if you are unfamiliar with thesis statement structure or structuring ideas presented in term papers generally speaking.

  • Title: Challenges and Importance of Managing Global Project Teams: A Focus on Cultural Intelligence

    Q1. Identify and enlist common issues that are faced by project and program managers in international / global
    projects in managing a global/ international project management team. In your opinion, how can these issues
    impact a global project’s budget and schedule? Q2. What is “Cultural Intelligence” and how is it important in managing global project teams?
    Please state any references used.

  • “Exploring the Pima Community College Databases: A Comprehensive Guide”

    everything you need to know is in the files, also at least 3 sources should come from the pima community college databases

  • “Global Sustainability and Human Rights: The Impact of Multinational Corporations on the Global Supply Chain”

    A course that is about sustainability, enviromental laws and rights. The effects of MNCs on 
    human rights and abuses and their effect on the global supply chain.
    Below are couple of Links that might be useful:
    https://www.ilo.org/resource/relevant-sdg-targets-related-labour-standards
    https://sdgs.un.org/goals
    https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/tips-for-the-future/future-of-sustainability/
    https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic

  • “Exploring the Effects of Social Media on Mental Health: A Case Study”

     Please see the attached document for instructions and related questions pertaining to the study.  

  • “Serving and Protecting: A Look into the Dallas Police Department” Introduction: The Dallas Police Department (DPD) is a vital part of the city’s law enforcement and plays a crucial role in maintaining the safety and security of its citizens.

    Please make sure the writing is in high school level. and the department will be Dallas police department

  • “Exploring Effective Family Counseling Models: A Comparative Analysis of Johnson and Greenberg’s Emotionally Focused Therapy and Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy”

    I have to write a paper on a family counseling models and expand on major topics about it and include similarities and differences with other models. you can either right about Johnson and Greenberg’s Emotionally Focused Therapy model or Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Family Therapy models. Those are the two I mainly use with clients. 

  • “Exploring Outbreak Investigations: A Case Study Using the CDC Solve the Outbreak App” “Applying Course Concepts in Investigative Analysis: A Reflection”

    Outbreak investigations are an important and challenging component of epidemiology and public health. When undertaking an outbreak investigation, epidemiologists use a series of steps to answer three questions: What is the problem? What is the cause? What can we do about it?
    In this Assignment, you will explore the 10 steps of an outbreak investigation by working through the CDC’s Solve the Outbreak interactive app.
    The Assignment
    Review Chapter 3 of The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual, “Conducting a Field Investigation,” and focus on the 10 steps in an outbreak investigation. Select one of the CDC Solve the Outbreak scenarios and complete the interactive activityLinks to an external site.. After completing the interactive activity, construct a 2- or 3-page response in which you: Summarize the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation (as listed in The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual).
    Ensure your summary provides a clear description of each step.
    How was each step presented in the scenario?
    Identify which concepts were covered in your scenario (incidence, prevalence, attack rate, etc.).
    How did you apply what you learned in this course to assist you in the investigation?
    What methods, practices, and/or techniques from this course helped you complete the investigation? Readings
    King, M. E., Bensyl, D. M., Goodman, R. A., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2018). Conducting a field investigationLinks to an external site.. In S. A. Rasmussen & R. A. Goodman (Eds.), The CDC field epidemiology manual. https://www.cdc.gov/eis/field-epi-manual/chapters/Field-Investigation.html
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Solve the outbreakLinks to an external site.. https://www.cdc.gov/mobile/applications/sto/web-app.html https://www.cdc.gov/mobile/applications/sto/web-app.html
    Rubric
    PUBH_6035_Module5_Assignment_Rubric
    PUBH_6035_Module5_Assignment_Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation (as listed in The CDC Field Epidemiology Manual). Describe each step and how each step was presented in the scenario.
    25 to >21.6 pts
    Outstanding
    Includes a fully developed, exceptional, and accurate summary of the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation and a fully developed and exceptional description of each of the steps and how each were presented.
    21.6 to >19.2 pts
    Very Good
    Includes a generally thorough, adequate, and accurate summary of the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation, and a generally thorough and adequate description of each of the steps and how each were presented.
    19.2 to >16.8 pts
    Meets Expectations
    Includes a limited or somewhat inadequate or inaccurate summary of the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation and a limited or somewhat inadequate description of each step or how each was presented.
    16.8 to >0 pts
    Does Not Meet Expectations
    Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately or accurately summarize the outbreak scenario using the 10 steps in the outbreak investigation, or does not adequately or accurately describe the steps or how each were presented.
    25 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify which concepts were covered in the scenario and how you applied what you learned in this course to assist you.
    25 to >21.6 pts
    Outstanding
    Includes a fully developed, exceptional, and accurate description of the concepts covered and how you applied concepts from this course in your investigation
    21.6 to >19.2 pts
    Very Good
    Includes a generally thorough, adequate, and accurate description of the concepts covered and how you applied concepts from this course in your investigation.
    19.2 to >16.8 pts
    Meets Expectations
    Includes a limited or somewhat inadequate or inaccurate description of the concepts covered and/or how you applied concepts from this course in your investigation.
    16.8 to >0 pts
    Does Not Meet Expectations
    Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately or accurately describe the concepts covered and/or how you applied concepts from this course in your investigation.
    25 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you applied particular methods, practices, and techniques from this course to complete the investigation.
    25 to >21.6 pts
    Outstanding
    Includes a fully developed and exceptional explanation of how you applied specific methods, practices, and techniques from this course in your investigation.
    21.6 to >19.2 pts
    Very Good
    Includes a generally thorough and adequate explanation of how you applied specific methods, practices, and techniques from this course in your investigation.
    19.2 to >16.8 pts
    Meets Expectations
    Includes a limited or somewhat inadequate explanation of how you applied specific methods, practices, and techniques from this course in your investigation.
    16.8 to >0 pts
    Does Not Meet Expectations
    Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain how you applied specific methods, practices, and techniques from this course in your investigation.
    25 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication:
    Extent to which written communication demonstrates proper grammar, mechanics, and spelling as well as proper paragraph structure with a clear central idea
    25 to >21.6 pts
    Outstanding
    Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors.
    21.6 to >19.2 pts
    Very Good
    Writing is generally sound, structurally and grammatically correct, and properly formatted, with minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting.
    19.2 to >16.8 pts
    Meets Expectations
    Adequate writing, format, and synthesis, but with infrequent and minor issues.
    16.8 to >0 pts
    Does Not Meet Expectations
    Writing does not meet basic expectations (e.g., clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, source citation, references, title page, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.).
    25 pts
    Total Points: 100