Brisk Essay Writers

Author: admin

  • A Tail of Two Pets: A Comparison and Contrast of Dogs and Cats

    My essay is attached. I need help achieving the feedback stated by the professor, which is the following:
    Your draft has some excellent information about the two pets. However, there are several repetitive paragraphs, and most of the specific points of comparison/contrast are not in the thesis statement. Ideally, you should have determined three main points to include in your thesis statement. Your paragraphs often include two or three points, and then some are repeated later in the essay. I recommend working on condensing some of the material so as not to be repetitive. Your citations look good, but be sure you are including a citation for each sentence that is paraphrased from a source. you may be doing that; I cannot tell for sure.

  • “Learning Beyond the Classroom: A Narrative and Reflective Essay on My English 110 Journey” Portfolio Reflection and Multimodal Revisions: Reflecting on My Progress and Growth as a Writer

    Please write a narrative essay 1st (2.5 pages):
    We learn in many ways—at school, of course, but also at home, among friends, & in the world itself. Consider a time when you learned something OUTSIDE of a classroom & narrate that experience. Show us what you learned, how you learned it, & why it matters.
    Begin either with a scene or with build-up to a scene (in medias res or exposition).
    Be very specific. Choose a single experience—this is not an autobiography.
    There are multiple ways to approach this—learning a new skill or sport, learning to set a table, learning to accept failure, etc.
    This essay is creative nonfiction—it requires a plot with a clear beginning, middle, & end.
    Your essay must meet the following requirements:
    Minimum of 750 words (approximately 3-4 pages)
    Focuses on a single, clear idea
    Uses story elements of character, setting, & plot to develop the main idea
    Uses MLA formatting
    Extra credit opportunities:
    We’ve spent time looking at & discussing multimodal texts. If your essay includes images that add to the story being told, you can earn up to 5 bonus points on the essay.
    Visit the CWRC: you can earn up to 5 points (one point per visit) by visiting the CWRC & showing me the blue sheet you receive after the session.
    Step 2: Please write a reflection essay (2.5 pages):
    English 110 Final Portfolio
    Your final project is to create a portfolio that showcases your best work from the semester. All three parts (one full revision, one multimodal revision, and one reflection essay) work together as a kind of exhibit of the ways that you have succeeded in the course.  
    Your final portfolio must include the following documents IN THIS ORDER:
    A 2-3-page reflective essay
    A multimodal revision of your narrative essay
    A revised, MLA formatted critical response or research paper
    Completing the Revisions
    Select two essays you wish to revise.
    The narrative essay will require a change of medium to a multimodal project that is not in essay format. This revision should represent your best attempts to “re-see” the piece & present it in a dynamic way for a specific audience.
    The critical response OR research paper should be carefully revised for content, structure, & organization to create a polished, MLA formatted essay. This revision should show that you paid close attention to content, organization, audience, & polished language.
    Expect to spend several hours carefully considering the comments you received on your drafts, the key concepts and strategies you have learned this semester, & your own experiences in the class. Substantially rework your essays. You should put a lot of thought into the papers you are revising, as you’ll want these revisions to demonstrate that you have made improvement in your writing & thinking in this course.
    Completing the Reflective Essay
    When you hand in the final project, the reflective essay will be the first element in the portfolio. However, it will be easier to write this essay AFTER you’ve completed your revisions.
    Because the reflection essay requires you to explain how you’ve met the requirements of the course this semester, you should discuss everything that has gone into your revision process. Your audience should know, from reading the reflection, precisely what the finished documents say about the things you have learned this semester.
    You should consider how your semester’s work has been both influenced by & is reflected in the revisions you’ve completed. Rather than simply listing changes you’ve made to the documents, you should talk about WHY you made the changes and HOW that relates to what we’ve accomplished in this course. You may want to discuss specific exercises or activities you did in class, ideas or strategies you gained through course readings, any help you received while visiting the CWRC, working with someone else outside of class, and anything else that contributed substantially to your success.
    Recap & Specifics:
    Your portfolio should include, bare minimum—a reflection essay, a multimodal revision of the narrative, & a revised copy of your critical response or research paper.
    The reflection is best completed after the revisions but should be the FIRST document in the portfolio.
    Multimodal revisions should reflect a total re-thinking of the format & delivery of the essay’s content. They cannot be traditional academic formats of Powerpoint or an essay, & they should have AT LEAST two of the following modes: visual, aural, linguistic, textual, gestural. They may or may not reach original word counts because of formatting.
    The revision of the critical response or research paper should reflect careful consideration for thesis, structure, content, language, & formatting. It should be a formally written essay.
    Multimodal revisions that are physical or are file types not supported by Canvas can be handed in during my office hours on any day prior to the due date.
    Your final portfolio will be the last thing I read before calculating your final average in this course, so you will want to make sure that it reflects your best efforts in all ways.
    Grading:
    Portfolios will be assessed according to their demonstration that students have met the learning outcomes for the course. Each category below carries 20 points for 100 total points in the portfolio.
    Comprehends & analyzes college-level texts.
    Integrates ideas from these texts into own writing.
    Writes for a variety of audiences with clear purpose and focus.
    Organizes ideas and uses textual support to develop concepts.
    Controls grammar and mechanics and demonstrates style
    An incomplete portfolio will not be accepted and will earn a grade of 0.
    Below I have attached my grades in the course. I have also attached my resarch paper thathat can help. 

  • Title: “Exploring Modernism and Postmodernism: Reflections on Art Appreciation and Enjoyment”

    Before completing this discussion, review the readings and videos from the lesson “Modernism and Postmodernism.” Next, answer the following questions:
    How would you define the concepts of modernism and/or postmodernism? In reviewing the materials for this lesson, did you encounter an artist who was able to change your way of seeing the world around you?
    Think about all that you have learned in the course this semester. Do you believe that the appreciation of art is the same as the enjoyment of art? Is it possible to both appreciate a work of art and also greatly dislike it? Why? For an artwork to be considered good, must it always be something beautiful? Be detailed and specific with your ideas.

  • “Effective Leadership for Managing Employees at Winter Valley Hospital”

    Develop a training presentation that explains how specific leadership qualities and leadership models can be used to improve the management of employees at Winter Valley Hospital. Your presentation must be 4–8 slides in length, include speaker notes, and cite any references using APA format.
    ***  See scenario attached in files

  • Title: “Enhancing Quality and Safety in Nursing: The Impact of Technology”

    First, review the technologies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bib on Tech in Nursing [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bib on Tech in Nursing [PDF]resource and select one of the options to use as the focus for this assessment.
    Next prepare a 4–6 page paper in which you introduce your selected technology and describe at least four peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of your selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing. You will conclude your paper by summarizing why you recommend a particular technology by underscoring the evidence-based resources you presented. Be sure that your paper includes all of the following elements:
    Introduction to the Selected Technology Topic
    What is your rationale for selecting this particular technology topic? What is interesting about it?
    What research process did you employ?
    Which databases did you use?
    Which search terms did you use?
    Note: In this section of your bibliography, you may use first-person since you are asked to describe your rationale for selecting the topic and the research strategies you employed. Use third person in the rest of the bibliography, however.
    Annotation Elements
    For each resource, include the full reference followed by the annotation.
    Explain the focus of the research or review article you chose.
    Provide a summary overview of the publication.
    According to this source, what is the impact of this technology on patient safety and quality of care?
    According to this source, what is the relevance of this technology to nursing practice and the work of the interdisciplinary health care team?
    Why did you select this publication to write about out of the many possible options? In other words, make the case as to why this resource is important for health care practitioners to read.
    Summary of Recommendation
    How would you tie together the key learnings from each of the four publications you examined?
    What organizational factors influence the selection of a technology in a health care setting? Consider such factors as organizational policies, resources, culture/social norms, commitment, training programs, and/or employee empowerment.
    How would you justify the implementation and use of the technology in a health care setting? This is the section where you will justify (prove) that the implementation of the
    patient care technology is appropriate or not. The evidence should be cited from the literature that was noted in the annotated bibliography.
    Consider the impact of the technology on the health care organization, patientcare/satisfaction, and interdisciplinary team productivity, satisfaction, and retention.

  • “Reimagining the Artist’s Studio: A Sustainable Oasis at the Salton Sea”

    1- You will be designing an artist studio that will be located adjacent to the Salton Sea, which at a larger context sits within the lower Colorado Desert. The studio needs to serve both the artist in question and the landscape that it sits upon. The designs must challenge the typical vernacular or idea of what an artist’s studio could be.
    You can decide the type of artist you’re designing for i.e. painter, sculptor, textile design, etc.
    Both decisions will inform the final design of the building and spaces. drawings are done by hand, they must be printed.
    2-after your drawing it use another copy by use AI images generated can also be used as points of inspiration.
    3- see the attached it info
    a) use the same floor plan design that attached Maybe you can add or modify a little
    1. Section drawings (2) @ appropriate scale 2. Elevation drawings (2) @ appropriate scale 3
    3-. Circulation diagram 4- Programmatic diagram 5–experiential perspectives

  • The Development of a Personal Philosophy and Framework for Family Nurse Practitioners: Exploring Competencies, Educational Requirements, and Role Development.

    m 
    Instructions
    ·      
    Develop a personal
    philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency
    competencies relating to the role and scope of practice of the family nurse
    practitioner. Identify a nurse theorist that you align your current/ planned
    practice and how they provide the foundation for this philosophy development.
    ·      
    Describe the type of
    educational courses and professional requirements required for APRN
    professional certification and licensing within the state that you will
    practice.
    ·      
    Identify the precise
    application process for your certification exam, your state regulations for
    application for prescriptive authority/practice, and issues related to APRN
    practice within your state.
    ·      
    Evaluate and discuss
    APRN roles and prescriptive privileges and impact on client safety and care
    ·      
    Compare the
    differences between prescriptive authority, credentialing, and clinical
    privileges and how each of these impact client safety and care
    ·      
    Evaluate the development
    of the advanced practice nurse role from a global perspective.
    Assignment Guidelines:
    ·      
    1200 – 1500 word paper
    (not including the cover page and references)
    ·      
    Required APA 7th edition
    for references and citations
    ·      
    Include a minimum of 6
    scholarly references (does not include text or websites) and the majority of
    references must not be older than 5 years
    ·      
    Demonstrate analysis,
    evaluation and synthesis of information (see the rubric for specifics)

  • “Exploring Data with SPSS: An Applied Data Analysis Assignment”

    Must have SPSS installed! This is an Applied Data Analysis class. Please read the instruction document thouroughly!! 

  • Title: Understanding Accreditation Standards in Healthcare Settings

    Healthcare systems and patients benefit from accreditation standards. Many accrediting bodies are represented in various practice settings. This activity is designed to expose you to some of the major aspects of accreditation and see how it affects quality and safety.
    Explore The Joint Commission and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) websites to understand what standards these accreditors require participants to meet. Consider:
    o History and original purpose for creation
    o The purpose for existence now—how has it evolved?
    o Where the requirements for each agency are publicly reported
    o Why public reporting of metrics is important
    o How each body operates
    Although we focused on CARF and The Joint Commission in this activity, there are many other accrediting bodies to consider in our practice settings:
    o Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC)
    o Accreditation Commission for Health Care, Inc. (ACHC)
    o American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF)
    o American Osteopathic Association Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (AOA/HFAP)
    o Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ)
    o Community Health Accreditation Program (CHAP)
    o Det Norske Veritas Healthcare (DNV Healthcare)
    Review the prompts above and summarize your notes in 525 words for future reference.

  • “The Production Context of Ferrero Group’s Response to the 2022 Salmonella Scandal: A Situational, Social, and Rhetorical Analysis” “Ferrero’s Salmonella Outbreak: A Threat to the Company’s Reputation and Consumer Trust”

    This is a portion of my research paper, so should be treated as such. This portion regards the production context of my artifact. My artifact for the research paper is Ferrero Group’s press releases following their 2022 salmonella scandal. Below is the outline for writing this section. Please utilize this for and sections that are applicable to make a cohesive paper:
    I. Situational Context A. Situational context: Date, time, place artifact’s message was delivered, medium and network of delivery
    II. Social Historical Circumstances
    A. Exigences/events/social justice issues that gave rise to the artifact 1. Exigence: Prior discourse, decision, event or controversy that prompted artifact
    2. Events and social justice issues might include laws; economics; educational, religious, civil or human rights issues; social movements, etc., that are relevant to artifact 3. Scholarly literature and popular press typically provide “clues” to such events
    B. Relevant cultural attitudes/norms/values that influence artifact’s content
    1. Find reputable polling data describing public attitudes toward social issues/controversies at:
    a. Gallup.com and Pewresearch.org b. Scholarly literature on topic
    c. News articles about artifact
    2. Legal norms/cases can be researched at Lexis Nexis using our library’s database (if relevant)
    III. Rhetorical Circumstances (Similar Messages and Artifacts)
    A. Similar Artifacts/Messages
    1. Is the artifact part of a genre? If so, what are features of this genre? What are other examples in this genre that emerged prior to or around same historical time? a. Example: If analyzing The Bachelorette, what other reality TV shows have emerged, especially those resembling the same dating theme?
    b. Example: If analyzing The Walking Dead, what other films and TV shows about zombies have emerged?
    2. Similar Discourse within Earlier Artifacts a. Is this artifact a sequel, a spin-off?
    b. What similarities do you see between the artifact and other discourse circulating at the time?
    c. Scholarly literature can be helpful to get a sense of prior discourse
    B. Symbols/values within the culture that the artifact incorporates a. Example: US Constitution’s “Declaration of Independence” was available to MLK in his appeal to “equality”; Disney caricatures in Jay-Z’s “Story of OJ”
    b. Example: TV shows featuring working women (e.g., Law & Order: SVU, Scandal, etc.) integrate feminist movement’s critiques of gender discrimination C. Publicity leading up to debut of artifact
    1. What medium was used to promote artifact? 2. What rhetoric is used to promote it to intended audiences? IV. Rhetor and Audience
    A. Who is rhetor/director/producer/singer/artist that created or delivered artifact? 1. What are his/her credentials, reputation, background that preceded the artifact?
    2. What does s/he value, not value?
    B. Who is audience?
    1. Number and demographics of immediate audience members
    V. Expectations and values of ideal/intended audience
    Please do not use other resources besides the ones I provide.
    Production Context Sources:
    Brummette, J. and Sisco, H.F. (2018). “Holy guacamole! Framing and the Chipotle contamination issue”, Journal of Communication Management, 22(3), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2017-0085 Chung, S., Chong, M., Chua, J.S. and Na, J.C. (2018). “Evolution of corporate reputation during an evolving controversy”, Journal of Communication Management, 23(1), 52-71. doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2018-0072 Coombs, W. T. (2013). Cadbury Salmonella Recall. Applied Crisis Communication and Crisis Management (pp. 63-74). Sage Publications Inc.
    Dhanesh, G. S., & Sriramesh, K. (2018). Culture and crisis communication: Nestle India’s Maggi Noodles case. Journal of International Management, 24(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.12.004.
    Ferrero. (2016, April 14). Ferrero 1st Food Company in the World for Reputation in the Ranking of the 100 Best Companies. Ferrero. https://www.ferrero.com/int/en/news-stories/news/ferrero-1st-food-company-in-the-world-for-reputation Golder, J. News, Z. (2022, April 6). Alleged Kinder Salmonella Crisis now Sweeping Europe After Recall. NewsWeek. https://www.newsweek.com/alleged-kinder-salmonella-crisis-now-sweeping-europe-after-recall-1695585 Jong, B. (2022, May 27). Cause of salmonella contamination in Kinder chocolate determined, says Ferrero. https://www.brusselstimes.com/229209/cause-of-salmonella-contamination-of-kinder-chocolate-determined-says-ferrero Press, A. (2022, April 12). Salmonella outbreak in chocolate eggs due to bad buttermilk. EUD health officials say. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2022-04-12/eu-salmonella-outbreak-chocolate-eggs Whitworth, J. (2022, May 19). More than 300 sick in Ferrero chocolate Salmonella outbreak. Food Safety News. https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/05/more-than-300-sick-in-ferrero-chocolate-salmonella-outbreak/ In the attachments section I have attached sources you may not be able to access. Thank you.