Problem Statement: Describe the general topic you will address and its importance and relevance to real-world issues.
Literature Review: In this section, you will use existing research on your subject and draw conclusions for informing your research proposal.
Summarize existing, applicable research in the field around your topic, utilizing peer-reviewed sources.
Identify the different research designs that have been used to generate knowledge on this topic, and describe how they differ.
Differentiate between the research designs for their advantages and disadvantages in addressing the research questions, providing specific examples from the research.
Evaluate the appropriateness of the research designs to the research questions, providing justification for your assertions. Which design seems most appropriate in addressing the question and why?
Summarize what is unknown or uncertain about your topic, synthesizing applicable existing research.
Discuss the appropriateness of the data analysis procedures used in the literature as they relate to the American Psychological Association’s principles and standards. Consider the assumptions made and presentation of data.
Research Question and Hypothesis
Create a testable research question based on your research about the topic.
Create a testable hypothesis based on your research question and research about the topic, explaining the extent to which the research supports your hypothesis.
Describe the variables that will be measured and manipulated in your study, and explain the selection of variables. Specifically, what independent and dependent variables will be used to test your hypothesis?
Proposed Methodology
Outline whom you plan to use as participants and how many participants you will need, providing justification.
Describe the materials (such as surveys) that will be used in your study and why these materials are most appropriate for your proposal, justifying claims with resources.
Describe the procedures you will use to collect your data and how these will appropriately address your research question.
Discuss the ethical concerns involved in your study and the steps you will take to remedy them. Consider who will be studied, what risks they will be exposed to, and what steps will be taken to maintain their responses’ confidentiality and obtain informed consent.
Data Analysis Plan
Explain what procedures you will use to prepare your raw data for analysis. If you have open-ended questions, how will they be coded? If you collected responses to multiple survey questions, how will the data be aggregated for analysis?
Propose general analytical procedures that you will use to analyze your data, and explain how these procedures will help obtain valid and reliable research results.
Describe which descriiptive statistics that could be obtained from your data would be most informative in answering your research question and why.
Discuss how your proposed data analysis methods are ethical and aligned with the American Psychological Association’s principles and standards.
Anticipated Results: What do you expect the results of your study to be, and how do your expected results complement or contradict the results in previous literature?
ALL PREVIOUS WORK IS UPLOADED INTO THE FILES SECTION, THIS HAS TO ALL BE PUT TOGETHER TO CREATE A COMPLETE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Author: admin
-
Title: “The Impact of Social Media Use on Mental Health: A Research Proposal”
-
“The Impact of Parenting Styles on Child Development: A Developmental Profile from Pre-Birth to Adolescence”
12 font
Times New Roman
Double Spaced
One inch margins
7 Pages including Title page and Reference Page
Any topic from Textbook Chapters 8 or 9 Developmental Profiles_ Pre-Birth Through Adolescence 9th Edition – PDF ebook
Minimum 3 references including Textbook -
Title: “Research Reflection: Exploring Audience, Purpose, and Habits in Conducting a Broader Community Study”
Review Everyone’s an Author, Chapter 16: Reporting Information.
Brainstorm your issue/topic to help you with Module 4: Broader Community Study by answering the following:
Consider your rhetorical situation; address your audience by answering the following:
What do you know about your audience? To what extent are they like or unlike your-or one another?
What background information will your audience need on your topic? Will their knowledge of it vary?
What terms need to be defined or illustrated with examples? What sorts of examples will be most effective for your audience?
What interest does your audience have in your topic? If they are not already interested in it, how can you get them interested—or at least to see that it matters? (pp. 316).
Think about the following, then write a short comment for each: (see description on pp. 316-322).
Be clear about your purpose.
Consider your stance.
Consider the larger context.
Think about media.
Think about design.
Read the following text: Interrogating Texts: Six Reading Habits to Develop in Your First Year at Harvard: http://guides.library.harvard.edu/sixreadinghabits
Review: FYC-ebook RWS 1302 section: Module Three: Running Research Journal
As you continue your research, consider thinking about your research habits. Now that you have started working on your CAB think about what you would do differently. Use the “Interrogating Text: Six Reading Habits to Develop…”.
Please discuss your research experience thus far. Include in your initial post the following information:
Your topic, introduction, and your research questions.
How have you implemented your Critical Annotated Bibliography Information into the next assignment?
How helpful was this preliminary assignment as scaffolding for the Broader Community Study?
What would that be if you had to change one thing in your research process? Why?
If you had to give someone advice on conducting research, from what you have learned so far, what would be your suggestions?
For the student response: (due Sunday by midnight)
As you reply to your classmates’/ writers’ selected topic/issue, explore the following points:
Discuss what you, as a reader, would like to see in the writer’s research. Explain why this would be important to their topic/issue.
What point of their discussion did you find thought-provoking and why?
Provide one suggestion for future research or perhaps a question that has not been addressed.
Add anything else that you think the writer needed to include in the topic/issue discussion. -
“Exploring Perspectives: A Critical Analysis of Sources on [Topic]”
Hello I already hyave 3 required sourses that I will provide and also 2 of them need to be found in the library of my college( one supporting an argument, and obe opposing an argument)
-
Title: A Tale of Two Essays: Comparing and Contrasting Narrative and Informative Writing
Write a 3-4 page (approximately 700-1000 words) comparison/contrast essay in the informative mode. In addition, must answer the “Think About Your Writing” questions, described below, beneath your essay.
Step 3. Think About Your Writing
Below your completed narrative, include answers to all of the following reflection questions:
Did you use the point-by-point or block method to organize your body paragraphs? What made you decide to organize your essay in this way (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Consider the ways a comparison/contrast essay can be organized. Which organization did you choose and why?
In what ways did writing a comparison/contrast essay differ from the Narrative essay you wrote in Touchstone 1? Give specific examples (3-4 sentences). Sophia says: Consider how the structure, point of view, and purpose of the two essays differ.
Remember that the writing process is a recursive process, and your first draft of an essay is rarely your last. What part of the draft did you struggle with (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about how you could improve the draft if you continued the writing process with revision and editing. -
“Integrating Mentorship and Collaborative Research for Professional Development in Nursing”
Please post a resonse to the post below by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose.
Academic activities and achievements can be rolled into mentorship engagement and collaborative research activities to become professional development objectives.
Participation in mentorship programs first ensures access to vast knowledge and experience from practitioners in the field. The setting of goals by nurses will establish an effective mentor-mentee relationship in offering personalized guidance following the expressed career goals of the nurse (Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2019). For example, a nurse interested in growing into a leadership position would want to network with a nurse manager. They would like to learn some tips about good management practices and working around healthcare policy.
Second, collaborative research projects allow nurses to participate and foster interdisciplinary collaboration in this field and further knowledge exchange. They either integrate themselves into the already established groups of researchers or initiate work on projects referring to some of the pertinent health challenges. By doing so, nurses contribute not only to the advancement of evidence-based practice but also gain practical insights that could enhance care for the patient (Nguyen et al., 2020). For example, a nurse in the field of psychatry may decide to have a goal in collaboration with other researchers on the development of interventions about supportive care for mental health patients under treatment.
These practices resonate with the direction of Walden University toward social change, with the mandate to encourage a culture of dissemination of knowledge and collaborative problem-solving in the domain of nursing. The mentorship engagement will help develop supportive networks that would enable nurses to learn from each other’s experiences and perspectives in an inclusive and collaborative environment created within the profession.
Through collaborative research efforts, nurses are better positioned and empowered to take up their roles as key players in developing new knowledge and innovation in critical health problems that directly affect society. They help further develop others in the profession through mentorship and research engagement while enhancing professional development and the mission for improved healthcare outcomes and health equity. At the core, the nurse is championing the pathway for an equitable and sustainable system of care, which integrates academic goals as part of the mission for the career. -
“Understanding the Basics of Economics: A Beginner’s Guide”
Instructions are attached below. But also don’t write the answers to these questions to perfect or professionally, what I’m saying is my professor is aware I’m one of those students who isn’t fond on this subject. Thanks! Also please attach a turnitin check, because the document will be submitted through turnitin. I still need a good grade though. ALSO ONLY USE THE LINK PROVIDED AND REFERERENCE THAT SOURCE FROM THE LINK ONLY.
-
“Exploring the Effects of Multiple Factors on Stream Health: A Multivariate ANOVA Analysis”
this assignment is for a biological statistic course. the instructions for the assignment will be in the file labeled ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS. i want you to specifically do the multivariate anova with 2 factors. I will also include a format example in a file named ASSIGNMENT EXAMPLE. I will include some class notes in a file labeled CLASS CONCEPTS 1/2. the data file for streams which is the only data that should be used for this paper will be included. if possible add a page of data calculated using a program called spss
-
Title: Exploring the Morality and Legality of Cannibalism in Modern Society “Exploring the Depths: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Topic at Hand”
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY
The reading assignment this journal will focus on is included next in this module, but I think it will be helpful for you to view these questions first so you know what you are looking for when you do the reading.
PURPOSE:
Welcome to your second reading journal assignment! This assignment is designed to help you get the most out of our latest reading assignment so you can begin to gather evidence and form arguments which will be useful to Essay #3.
DIRECTIONS:
Please choose EXACTLY FOUR of the questions in the list below to answer for up to 10 points each. DO NOT ANSWER ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS.
Your assignment is to read FOUR of the articles in your reading assignment. You are required to read the following pieces:
Clare Murphy’s “Cannibalism: A Modern Taboo”
J Jeremy Wisnewski’s “Murder, Cannibalism, and Indirect Suicide: A Philosophical Study of a Recent Case”
Mark Hay’s “How Courts Treat Consensual Cannibalis”
Please pick ONE of the following optional articles as your fourth article:
Laurence Goldman’s Encyclopedia piece on cannibalism OR
Alyssa Newcomb’s “Dutch TV Hosts Appear to Dine on Each Other’s Flesh”
Based on what you read, what makes people judge certain types of cannibalism as more acceptable than others? Feel free to briefly discuss the types of cannibalism, but don’t let simple definitions take over your answer.
Based on what you read, what type of cannibalism did Armin Meiwes partake in? Why does it not fit the other two types of cannibalism?
Based on what you read, why is it significant that Meiwes and Brandes’ act was consensual? How does this fact make their act different than cannibalism that other people such as Jeffrey Dahmer, Issei Sagawa, Katherine Knights, Omaima Nelson, or Albert Fish partook in? (You can look these people up easily and see what they did, but beware. It’s awful.)
Based on what you read, do you think Meiwes and Brandes’ act was morally wrong? What are the best arguments for the act being wrong that you read in this reading assignment?
Many are quick to label these men as mentally ill. What. does the reading say about these men’s mental health? Who does this information come from? Why is this significant?
Based on what you read, do you see any problem with the Brandes’ consent? If so, explain why his consent may not be valid and the act might be, therefore, immoral.
Based on what you read, do you think Meiwes and Brandes’ act was not morally wrong? What are the best arguments for the act not being morally wrong that you read in this reading assignment?
Is what the Dutch TV hosts did morally wrong? Why or why not?
According to the reading, what are vore forums and online communities? Do you think partaking in these online discussions would have or should have satisfied Meiwes and Brandes? Why or why not?
Aside from morality, why is your opinion of what you read about the legality of cannibalism?
Wisnewski talks about obligations to the dead as a possible argument against what Meiwes and Brandes did. What are our obligations to the dead, if any? How did what Meiwes and Brandes did interfere with or not interfere with those obligations, if they do exist?
Based on what you read, how have accusations of cannibalism been used in the past as a tool of imperialism and racism?
Please adhere to the following technical guidelines:
Double-space your document.
Do not type the question but number your answers 1-4. It’s ok if the numbers don’t exactly correspond with the number on the list above, as long as I can see four separate, numbered answers
Show that you read the three required pieces in the reading assignment as well as one optional piece.
Clearly name the author or article title in each answer.
Write at least 900 words total
Distribute your development evenly so you earn the maximum points on each question
Include one well-chosen quotation in every answer. Avoid including more than two per answer.
Place quotations early in your answers and analyze them thoroughly. -
The Rise of Narcissism: Understanding the Difference Between Healthy Self-Regard and Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Its Impact on Individuals and Society Introduction In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the rise of narcissism in
Write a 1000 word paper answering the following question:
“I, I, I, me, me, me. We are becoming a
nation of narcissists” (Psychology Today, 2021).
How does a diagnosis of
Narcissistic Personality Disorder differ from a healthy level of self-regard,
and what challenges does it pose for people whose lives are affected by it?