Now, we get to take the revised product and subject it to some estimates of costs. There still is no understanding of the selling price of the product. How much will it cost to create the product? Are there recurring engineering costs?
Create and submit a pro-forma budget that includes labor, materials, risk, or other resources needed to create the modified product in assignment 3.
Author: admin
-
“Revised Product Pro-Forma Budget” Revised Product Pro-Forma Budget Labor Costs: – Design and development team: $50,000 – Manufacturing team: $25,000 – Quality control team: $10
-
Title: “Assessing Sharp Pain in an Obese Male: Differential Diagnoses and Diagnostic Approach” Differential Diagnoses: 1. Hernia 2. Osteoarthritis 3. Sciatica 1. Hern
45 year old obese male patient presents to office with a sharp pain just lateral to the groin area or anterior thigh area. Patient reports this has gotten worse over several week. He has difficulty putting weight on right leg (side of pain) and finds it difficult to get up from his chair. He denies any benefit from hot or cold application to the area. He denies any time of day/night when it is better or worse, but rest does help some.
Give 3 differential diagnosises and how you would rule them in or out. (Please be specific and include any imaging, testing and/or physical exams) -
“Voices of Compassion: A Letter to the Editor from a Migrant Mother in ‘The Harvest Gypsies’”
Assignment Prompt
Throughout Unit 1, you have read literary and nonfiction works that evokes compassion or empathy in an audience to inspire action or bring about a deeper understanding of the world. You will now apply what you have observed about empathy and write a letter to the editor about an issue as though you are one of the characters from the assigned readings. (You are NOT rewriting the story). Your purpose for writing this letter to the editor is to persuade your audience of your claim and evoke compassion and empathy for your character. For instance, you could write a letter to the editor from Miss Lottie’s perspective on the lack of compassion and respect in society. Click here to read an letter to the editor using this example. Since “Marigolds” is used in the sample paper for this assignment, you are unable to use this story in your paper.
When writing your claim for your letter to the editor, keep in mind that compassion and empathy refer to the feelings you get in response to another’s emotions, suffering, or misfortune combined with a desire to help. Use at least two direct quotes to support your claim. As you write, keep in mind the unit’s essential question: How does human compassion inform our understanding of the world?
the harvest gypsies by john steinback -
“Improving Medication Safety: Objectives, Strategies, and Background Analysis” “Assessing the Quality of Research and Writing in Academic Assignments”
Write a 3-4 page paper in APA format with a minimum of 3 references.
Address the following Areas:
Project Objectives
The objectives are something you hope to achieve from doing the project
Strategies
Strategies are the method you will use to reach the objectives you have set for your project
Background Analysis
This may also be called a situation analysis. This section you will need to discuss what is happening that made you decided to do your capstone project.
For example, the nurses at a facility are making a many medication errors. For your capstone project you decide you will try to reduce the number of medication errors from 10 every week to three a week. You will have to analyze why the errors are taking place. Maybe the lighting in the medication room is poor or maybe the nurses are working 70 hours every week.
You will also need to locate peer review articles that support you analysis.
this is a continual assigment from the past two orderd , I attached them bellow for refernce .
Please use the templet I attached bellow
Capstone Objectives, Strategies, and Background Template
Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019 (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection
15 pts
Exemplary
Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.
10 pts
Accomplished
Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored
5 pts
Developing
Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning
15 pts
Exemplary
Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
10 pts
Accomplished
Provides distinguishing, and accurate evidence base analyzing and integrating the main concept beyond the required (5) peer-reviewed sources. Research sources are relevant, accurate, current (less than 5 years old) reliable, reflecting and validating the strength of the content.
5 pts
Developing
Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 3 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation
15 pts
Exemplary
Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing
10 pts
Accomplished
Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.
5 pts
Developing
Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting
15 pts
Exemplary
Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.
10 pts
Accomplished
Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format
5 pts
Developing
Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory – Beginning
Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers.
15 pts
Total Points: 60 -
Methodology for a Study on HIV Transmission Knowledge and Safe Sexual Practices Methodology for a Study on HIV Transmission Knowledge and Safe Sexual Practices Title: Ensuring Consistency in Data Collection for Measuring Weekly Walking Hours Among Participants
This assignment will focus on the research methodology for the study that you proposed in your Problem Significance and Review of Literature Assignment. Once again, your modules and your textbook will help you develop the sections of this paper. For example, when you are deciding on your study design, you will go to the Module 6 and review the power points and read Chapters 9 and 10 in your textbook. The information in these resources will help you decide on the type of design that best fits your study.
Here are some tips for the sections of the Methodology Assignment. Use the following headings to develop APA headings for your paper. Include the following information in each section.
Purpose: Use the corrected draft from your other assignment. Identify the purpose of the study. You will write this as: The purpose of the study is to….
Methodology
Research Design: identify the type of design you will use. Be specific—descriptive, quasi-experimental or experimental is not enough. Examples might include: Randomized control trial, cohort, correlational, pre-test-post-test, etc. The text provides descriptions of the designs. Be sure to include why the design is appropriate for the study. This sentence should be referenced. For example:
Type of design: A cross-sectional, correlational study will be conducted to examine the relationship between knowledge of HIV transmission, prophylactic use of antiretroviral medications, altruism, and the use of safe sexual practices (no reference needed since this is our study). A cross-sectional design is a non-experimental research design in which the data is collected at one point in time (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2019). Because participants will be completing variable specific questionnaires at one point in time, the research design is appropriate for the study.
Extraneous variables: These can be situational—such as a cold environment when taking a test, personal—such as an individual taking a test being sleepless; or researcher based—such as if the researcher gave clues on how to act or respond during the study. Additionally, using self-report instruments or tools might be an extraneous variable—because the individual is having to ‘self-report information’).
Sampling plan: describe the type of sampling plan you will conduct—usually a non-probability or probability sample—the LoBiondo-Wood and Haber textbook describes the types of sampling plans you can choose to fit your study. Be sure to indicate the specific sampling plan and to reference the information.
Population: include the population your sample will represent and an estimated sample size you would obtain to conduct the study. Be sure to include exclusion and inclusion criteria and remember that these criteria can help to control extraneous variables and bias too.
Obtaining sample: describe how you would obtain the sample. Describe your recruitment process or any plans for using flyers or advertisements. If you plan a randomized study, how will you randomize the participants (coin toss/computer program)?
Plan for Data Collection: describe the how, when, and where of data collection. Be sure to include that you will first obtain IRB approval and how you will obtain informed consent—include the venue where you would conduct the study.
Data Collection Tools/Measures:
If you decide to use a tool (questionnaire or instrument) from a study you read, include the number of items (or questions) the tool has, who created the tool, and reliability and validity of the tool. A copy of the tool should be added as an appendix to the paper. If the reliability and validity of the tool is not available in the literature, this would be a limitation.
If you plan to develop your own data collection tool, a copy must be provided as an appendix. Be sure to describe how your methodology speaks to reliability and validity and how the tool you develop ensures accurate measurement of the variable. For example, if you plan to examine the number of hours someone walks per week, how will you document that to ensure consistency among participants? If you plan to develop a table for data entry, that must also be included as an appendix. All appendices are placed behind the references.
If using physiologic measures, describe how you will ensure consistency in data collection among all participants. -
Cultural Expression and Beliefs of Mexican American Women During the Post-Partum Period: Providing Culturally Congruent Care as a DNP “Assessment of Information Literacy, Writing, and Formatting in a Research Essay”
Less than 20% plaigarism and 0% AI.
Instructions:
Make your search on the Cultural Expression, Meanings, Beliefs, and Practices of Mexican American Women During the Post- Partum Period. Review their beliefs and myths about it, not only for the mother’s care but also for the new baby. Write an essay with your findings, and explain how you can, as a DNP, provide culturally congruent care to this patient.
Contribute a minimum of 3 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Add a case study related to the topic in a separate paper to be discuss in class.
Submission Instructions:
Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism.
Rubric
– Official Essay Rubric
– Official Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
Mastery of the Information
30 to >27.0 pts
Excellent
The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.
27 to >24.0 pts
Good
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.
24 to >21.0 pts
Fair
The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.
21 to >18.0 pts
Poor
The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.
18 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Structure of the Essay
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
Development of Ideas
15 to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.
14 to >12.0 pts
Good (12 -11 pts)
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.
12 to >11.0 pts
Fair
Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.
11 to >9.0 pts
Poor
Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.
9 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy
Quality of Resources
15 to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.
14 to >12.0 pts
Good
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.
12 to >11.0 pts
Fair
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.
11 to >9.0 pts
Poor
The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.
9 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
Mechanics and Grammar
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
8 to >7.0 pts
Fair
Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
7 to >5.0 pts
Poor
Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.
9 to >8.0 pts
Good
The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.
8 to >6.0 pts
Fair
The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.
6 to >5.0 pts
Poor
The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 100 -
Title: Reflecting on My Writing Process: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Use of AI
The goal of this assignment is to examine and reflect on your own writing process. You don’t have to answer every single one of these questions, but you can use these as points of reference to create your reflection.
-What does brainstorming look like for you? Is that something you even do? If not, why?
-Do you read over the assignment details before you start brainstorming, or do you jump into the drafting process?
-When you start drafting, do you start at the introduction, or do you get your points out the way by working on the body paragraphs?
-What does revising look like for you? Do you have someone else review your writing, or do you run it through Grammarly and hope for the best?
-Have you ever used AI to write a paper (no penalty or judgement talking about it here)? If so, how do you think it benefitted you?
-What are your strengths and weaknesses when it comes to writing?
Your assignment submission should be 600-700 words in length. It should contain proper grammar, be free of spelling errors, and reflect critical thinking. You should have an introduction with a thesis, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. It should also be double spaced, in Times New Roman font. -
“Unfair Termination at Johnston-Willis Hospital: A Call for Fairness and Understanding”
This is for Lisa Licata,
Hello my name is Vanessa Avant, I worked at Johnston-Willis Hospital for 3 years but work for hca for 7 years. Recently, I was terminated for not being certified as a surgical tech. They gave me 14 day in order to get my certificate which I tried to do. I dont feel like 14 day was enough time for me to get a certificate. I worked in CSS as as sterile processor first, then I transferred to the OR to be a surgical tech. At that time there were different managers. On my orientation day I did not show up because I did not pass my test to be certified. The manager at the time called me in to say I don’t need to be certified at that time and I can start the next day, and I did so. Fast forward to the manager now gave me a letter stating that I needed to be certified. As soon as I received that letter I applied to get certified to sit for my test. I paid extra to expedite to take my test as soon as possible. I take my test June 24, 2023. I’m not saying that I want my job back I’m just saying, I do not want a termination on my record. -
Title: Case Study Analysis: Improving Employee Engagement at XYZ Company
Please complete the case study and return your solutions to this drop box as either a .pdf or .docx. These assignments should typically be completed in 1-2 pages. Please be sure to use your own words (do not plagiarizing) and remember cite your sources.
-
“Applying Lean Method Principles to the Virtual Art Gallery Experience (VAGE) Business Model Canvas” Developing a Virtual Art Gallery Platform: Creating Revenue Streams and Engaging with Partners
complete a discussion on the building blocks and
a summary of how you applied the lean method principles in the development of your BMC. which is attached under named Virtual Art Gallery Experience (VAGE)
The BMC contains the following building blocks:
customer segments
value proposition
distribution channels
customer relationships
revenue streams
key resources
key activities
key partners
cost structure
Description of your lean start-up entrepreneurial venture.
The Virtual Art Gallery Experience (VAGE) is a virtual and augmented reality platform that turns the tradition of visiting an art gallery or showroom into a virtual and interactive experience. Targeting art enthusiasts, collectors, galleries and artists; the VAGE platform revolutionizes the global trade, viewing and enjoyment of art by enabling users to visit global art exhibitions virtually in a 360-degree open environment with interactive elements such as artists’ commentaries and also enable customers to visualise artworks in their private spaces with Augmented Reality (AR) functions.
The platform is designed to support all prospective customers by providing users with different tour options (through interactive tours offered) education on the different art styles, artists and other pieces of knowledge and also safe for payment, by enabling it through a safe and secure e-commerce payment portal mechanism that builds trust.
The VAGE is powered by a range of features, such as the game engine integration that allows users to cycle through collections and galleries and view content seamlessly.
Fees from subscriptions, art sales commissions, tickets for virtual events, advertising and licensing are all revenue streams for the artists and the gallery. For the first time, VAGE democratises access to art, creates more ways for engagement, and opens more entry to revenue for both artists and galleries.
BMC
1. Customer Segments
Art Enthusiasts:
Individuals who appreciate and explore art.
Students and researchers of art and art history.
Art Collectors:
High-net-worth individuals and art investors.
Corporate collectors looking for unique pieces.
Art Galleries and Museums:
Galleries looking to expand their reach and offer virtual tours.
Museums who are aiming to make exhibitions accessible to a global audience.
Artists:
Emerging and established artists seeking new platforms to showcase and sell their work.
2. Value Proposition
Immersive Art Experiences:
Virtual and augmented reality exhibitions offering a lifelike viewing experience.
Interactive elements allowing users to learn more about the art and the artists.
Global Accessibility:
Access to art exhibitions from anywhere in the world.
Ability to attend virtual gallery openings and artist talks.
Innovative Art Sales Platform:
Secure platform for purchasing original artworks and limited editions.
Virtual try-before-you-buy feature using AR to visualize art in users’ spaces.
Support for Artists and Galleries:
Increased exposure and sales opportunities for artists.
New revenue streams for galleries and museums through virtual tickets and sales.
3. Distribution Channels
Online Platform:
Website and mobile app for accessing virtual galleries and AR features.
VR and AR Headsets:
Compatibility with popular VR headsets for an immersive experience.
AR features accessible through smartphones and tablets.
Social Media and Partnerships:
Integration with social media platforms for promotion and sharing.
Collaborations with tech companies and art institutions.
4. Customer Relationships
Personalized Experience:
Customized art recommendations based on user preferences and viewing history.
Personal virtual tours with curators and artists.
Community Building:
Online forums and social media groups for art discussions and networking.
Regular virtual events such as gallery openings, artist talks, and workshops.
Membership Programs:
Subscription plans offering exclusive access to premium content and early sales.
Loyalty rewards for frequent visitors and purchasers.
5. Revenue Streams
Subscription Fees:
Monthly or annual subscription for premium access to virtual galleries and exclusive content.
Art Sales Commissions:
Commission on sales of artworks through the platform.
Virtual Event Tickets:
Fees for attending virtual gallery openings, artist talks, and workshops.
Advertising and Sponsorships:
Revenue from ads and sponsored content within the virtual platform.
Licensing and Partnerships:
Licensing VR and AR technology to other galleries and museums.
Partnership fees from tech companies and educational institutions.
6. Key Resources
Technological Resources:
VR and AR development platforms and tools.
Secure e-commerce and payment processing systems.
Human Resources:
Software developers and VR/AR specialists.
Art curators, historians, and marketing professionals.
Content Resources:
High-quality digital reproductions of artworks.
Access to a network of artists and galleries.
7. Key Activities
Platform Development and Maintenance:
Developing and updating the VR and AR features.
Ensuring a seamless and secure user experience.
Content Creation and Curation:
Curating virtual exhibitions and creating engaging content.
Collaborating with artists and galleries to feature their work.
Marketing and Community Engagement:
Running marketing campaigns to attract users and promote events.
Engaging with the community through social media and events.
Sales and Customer Support:
Facilitating art sales and managing transactions.
Providing customer support for technical issues and inquiries.
8. Key Partners
Art Institutions:
Galleries and museums providing artwork and exhibitions.
Tech Companies:
VR and AR hardware and software providers.
E-commerce and payment processing partners.
Artists and Curators:
Collaborating artists and curators for exclusive content.
Educational Institutions:
Schools and universities for educational programs and research.
9. Cost Structure
Fixed Costs:
Salaries for employees and contractors.
Lease for office space and development facilities.
Depreciation of VR/AR equipment and technology infrastructure.
Variable Costs:
Marketing and advertising expenses.
Costs for creating and curating digital content.
Licensing fees for VR/AR development tools.
Additional Costs:
Hosting and maintenance of the online platform.
Customer support and community management expenses.
Fees for transaction processing and security measures.