Please answer all questions as indicated. These questions are for a Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence course and the language that is followed in the class is python. I have attached the questions below so please take a look at them! Mainly urgently need question 2 and 3. So an emphasis on those two questions.
Author: admin
-
“Improving Healthcare through Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Interview with a Healthcare Professional”
Interview conducted with a healthcare professional identifying an issue that could be improved with interdisciplinary approach. This branches off of first assignment done by you. The 4 page analysis
-
Title: Protection and Function of the Alimentary Canal and Urinary System
What layer of the alimentary canal tissue is capable of helping to protect the body against disease, and through what mechanism?
Describe the three regions of the pharynx and their functions.
What is suggested by the presence of white blood cells found in the urine?
Why are females more likely to contract bladder infections than males?
Describe three of the differences between the walls of the large and small intestines. -
“Understanding Fiduciary Trust Relationships”
What kind of relationships are fiduciary trust relationships? Please answer in 2-3 sentences.
I’ll give you later the answer of two student to comment them -
“The Importance of Libraries: A Personal Reflection”
Follow the instructions and write about the library using my notes and my answer to question 1. It’s only question 2 that I’ve attached what to do since I knew what to answer question 1.
-
Title: “Environmental Science and Sustainability: A Comparison of Two News Articles”
In this module, you submit an Article Review. Choose two or more articles from a local or national news media source that relates to an environmental topic. Look for the parts of the articles that relate to the material from Module 1 and write a report comparing and contrasting both articles, what is expressed in the articles, and the related material in Module 1. Specifically, pay attention to the relationship with the principles of sustainability.
The Article Review should be submitted as a Word document attached to the assignment tool. Your total write-up and explanation should be at least 300 words and should include the following:
In your own words, define the term ‘environmental science.’
Describe human survival based on developing practices that will achieve sustainable systems.
Using APA style, provide reference information detailing where you obtained the articles, the authors, and the published dates.
Give a brief review of each article as it was written by the author.
Environmental science, like many other science disciplines, comes with its own vocabulary. Throughout this course, you will be introduced to new terms and words with their own unique definitions and uses. It will benefit you greatly to try and use this new vocabulary as you complete the assignments and assessments in the course. To begin with, the definition of environmental science is “an interdisciplinary study of (1) how the earth (nature) works and has survived and thrived, (2) how humans interact with the environment, and (3) how we can live more sustainably (Miller & Spoolman, 2021, p. 3).
Another aspect of environmental science, part of that interdisciplinary study that requires your attention, is the involvement with other non-life science disciplines such as geography, economics, social science, and political science. Other disciplines such as biology, chemistry, and physics play a role in understanding environmental science. Module 2 provides a basic review of the chemical and physical components needed to understand some environmental concepts. One example of social science involvement is the study of the human population or demographics, which is addressed in Module 5. You will learn that one of the main causes of environmental problems is the rate of growth of the human population.
There is also an integrating theme throughout the course. It is formally termed “environmental sustainability” and is defined as “the capacity of the earth’s natural systems and human cultural systems to survive, flourish, and adapt to changing environmental conditions into the very long-term future” (Miller & Spoolman, 2021 p. 612). Understand that there are other forms of sustainability that relate to business, government, and non-renewable energy. You will be reminded throughout the course that what humans need to survive comes from the natural world. It is absolutely imperative that humans strive to sustain the “natural capital” or “goods and services” that we get from the natural world.
Finally, there is a worldview of stewardship, which includes an ethical responsibility to be caring and responsible managers, or stewards, of the earth. This concept will be offered using an example of a steward, but we are all stewards anytime we recycle, turn off the water when brushing our teeth, or use mass transit.
https://platform.virdocs.com/read/2415652/1/#/4/2[cover-page]/6[SXMTZ63C9M93S1HMP049] -
Title: “Exploring the Impact of Technology on Education: A Critical Analysis”
Please ask me any question about the assignment I can send you some lecture slides and everything if you need 🙂
That’s my final year essay so has to be passed, thank you for your cooperation! -
Title: Examining the Use of Media by Professional Organizations to Promote Health Policy Agendas: A Critique
Critique an example of a professional organization’s use of media to promote a health policy agenda. Discuss attributes of success or lack thereof.
Guided Response:
In your response, it is important to be respectful, make your response meaningful, and express yourself clearly. It is a best practice to not use unsupported personal opinions, generalizations or language that might be viewed as offensive to others. If you are trying to extend a discussion, consider using probing questions. If providing a disagreement to a peer post remain respectful, considerate, and maintain an academic tone.
Expectations
Peer Responses:
Length: A minimum of 150 words per post, not including references
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA per post from within the last 5 years
Do not use the same references as your peers -
Title: “Reviving a Theater Company through Creative Problem Solving and Leadership” Summary: The case “A Turnaround Story: How Creative Problem Solving and Creative Leadership Revived a Theater Company” explores the challenges faced by the fictional theater
You are to provide a summary of the case A Turnaround Story: How Creative Problem Solving and Creative Leadership Revived a Theater Company (ATTACHED) and incorporate the knowledge gained from the text. You are also welcome to provide your personal insight and reflection as well into the case. A minimum of three “3” pages are required. Additional input from other sources is welcomed (scholarly journals and/or articles).
-
“Ethical Dilemma: Female Circumcision and the Role of Relativism in Healthcare” “Challenging Cultural Relativism: The Ethical Dilemma of Female Circumcision”
Initial Post Instructions
The study of ethics and philosophy is one that brings many different kinds of “thinkers” together. One person’s philosophy on ethics is another person’s philosophy on evil. We will be working this term on constructing personal ethical bases and understanding how ethical codes (both personal and professional) are created and followed.
To start us thinking about the different areas of philosophy and ethics, and how we fit into the different molds or world views, let’s imagine the following scenario:
It is 2019. The federal law banning female circumcision is still under appeal in the courts. You are a nurse assisting a plastic surgeon at a local hospital. The plastic surgeon comes from a country where they practice “female circumcision”. This practice is also sometimes called “female genital mutilation”.
Fire Eyes: Female Circumcision, Written by Soraya Mire, Directed by Soraya Mire, Ethnographer Soraya Mire, Narrated by Carol Christiansen (New York, NY: Filmakers Library, 1995), 57 minutes
You are not a member of the doctor’s culture but reside in a state where this practice is still legal. The plastic surgeon has agreed to perform this practice on a young girl, the daughter of a friend of the surgeon. The friend has authorized the procedure. The girl only knows this is a custom. You did not know that today you would be asked to assist in this procedure. You can refuse to participate (your job may be on the line in the future due to that decision). Or you can assist the surgeon. What ought you to do? We now want to examine the ethical issues involved. To do this, let’s look at the role of relativism, moral truths, and other issues.
For the initial post, address the following questions:
What would a subjective moral relativist say about what this doctor is doing? Do you agree with the subjective moral relativist? Why or why not?
Examine what a cultural moral relativist would say here. Do you agree with the cultural relativist? Why or why not?
Name and evaluate general criticisms of cultural relativism as being the wrong moral approach.
Is there an objective moral truth about any of the possible actions by the nurse and/or doctor in this case? Why or why not?
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
Writing Requirements
Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)
Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source)
APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Course Outcomes
CO 1: Distinguish between cultural relativism and subjective relativism and assess both as moral approaches including an estimation of whether there are actually absolute moral truths.
RESPOND TO THIS POST FOR A FOLLOW UP POST
Hello Class and Professor,
In relation to this scenario, the subjective moral relativist could argue that the actions of the plastic surgeon are morally acceptable based on their cultural background and their belief on what is morally “right” or “wrong” simply based off whatever the surgeon says. The perspective of the subjective moral relativist states that morality is subjective and can differ amongst people and specific cultures. Personally, I do not agree with the subjective moral relativist because if their belief is that it doesn’t matter the age of the girls who are getting circumcised as long as they do so which would be a violation of the patient’s autonomy, regardless of their age. This is a very one-sided opinion and perspective. As BBC (n.d.) states, many objections to the practice of genital cutting are concerned with the circumstances in place for when it’s done.
A cultural moral relativist would say the procedure is moral due to cultural society that the girl practices in. As Rachels, S. & Rachels, J. (2023) state, this viewpoint means that one is expected to adhere to the customs of a larger group rather than oneself. I do not agree with this because this also does not allow for autonomy and the girls choice to make her own decision and express her opinion.
General criticisms of cultural relativism being the wrong approach would include the fact that there are no universal standards involved which can lead to violations of human rights. Also, cultural relativism can lead to inconsistency with morals since it suggests that a practice within a culture is morally acceptable even if it contradicts other cultural practices.
The objective moral truth by myself, the nurse, is that ultimately, I would consider that the female circumcision procedure should be decided by the young girl. She should be given a thorough description of the procedure, all it entails, risk factors, and side effects prior to making her decision. That would ensure that autonomy is being practiced. I would not feel comfortable being a part of this procedure for moral and ethical reasons.
References:
BBC – Ethics – Female circumcision. (n.d.). Www.bbc.co.uk. https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/femalecircumcision/femalecirc_1.shtmlLinks to an external site.
Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2023). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.