Author: admin

  • “Improving Workflow and Evaluating Program Effectiveness: A Quality Improvement Plan”

    Using a problem that you have witnessed at your placement site or that you foresee in a program you are creating, develop a quality improvement plan for improving work processes. Your quality improvement plan should include a description of the problem, delineate what you will measure, the frequency of measurement, and any supplemental measurements needed to inform your QI team as you attempt to improve that process (Narrative or paper format for this section). In addition, choose two of your program goals and develop tools for evaluation using a 360 evaluation format. My expectation for this is that you will choose at least three communities of interest (client, community partners, employees, the board of directors, etc.) and develop a survey or questionnaire they can answer that will give you information about the effectiveness of the program and based on the goal you are evaluating. If your goal is too broad, choose one of the objectives from two different goals. The questions will be similar for the three surveys, but you may need to slightly change the focus. This is a total of 6 surveys (minimum of 10 questions each survey). Identify a timeline for distribution of the surveys, how often you will distribute the surveys, and how you will analyze the data. Your assignment will include the following elements: 3 pages (this is double-spaced, but if you choose to do single-spaced it would be about 1-1.5 pages) describing your quality improvement plan for a problem dealing with workflow or work processes. Your workflow quality assurance plan will include: Description of the problem What you are measuring and why you are measuring it Frequency of measurement Supplemental measurements needed to improve this workflow problem 360 evaluation of two program goals and/or two objectives (depending on which makes the most sense to evaluate). Your 360 evaluation will include A brief description of each goal/objective and the 360 evaluation process A brief description of the communities of interest you are going to survey and how getting information from them will help you determine if you are achieving your goal or if the treatment protocol, research, evidence-based treatment, etc. is effective and doing what it is supposed to be doing 3 surveys for each goal/objective with a minimum of 10 questions each, totaling 6 surveys (the surveys will be similar, but you need to make sure it makes sense for the community of interest you will be giving the survey to) For example, if you are going to build a relationship with a referral source as one objective you may survey the clients who are receiving services as a result of this referral, the individual(s) offering the referral, and the administrator or director who oversees the referral process. If your second goal for example is to improve clinical skill of pre-licensed clinicians, you may survey the client’s served by pre-licensed clinicians, the clinicians, and their supervisors. Conclusion/Summary of your quality assurance plan The format of this assignment should be one that you would present to a Board of Directors or communities of interest and not APA formatted. You may need to use charts, graphics, pictures, etc. to make your point and achieve an aesthetically pleasing document for those who will be reviewing it (Program directors, the Board of Directors, and potential outside communities of interest). Use the Quality Assurance Outline Download Quality Assurance Outlinefor further guidance.

  • “Exploring Satire, Social Criticism, and Moral Dilemmas in Joseph Andrews: A Close Reading of Chapters 186-240”

    joseph andrews Novel, read from 186 to 240
    These are the things we should focus on while making our presentation.
    The techniques, characters, and context.
    The points of discussion are:
    1. The novel as a burlesque.
    2- The novel as picaresque.
    3- The novel as a work of social and political criticism. 
    4- The novel as a comic epic in prose.
    5- Innocence vs. experience.
    6- Religious doctrine vs. virtue.

  • “The Importance of Understanding and Managing Adverse Effects of Typical Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Treatment” Antipsychotic medications have been a cornerstone in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, particularly Schizophrenia. These medications, also known as

     
    Antipsychotic medications play a crucial role in managing psychiatric disorders, particularly Schizophrenia. However, understanding their adverse effects is essential for safe and effective patient care. Explores the common adverse effects associated with typical antipsychotics, emphasizing the importance of monitoring, patient education, and individualized treatment approaches.
    Provide a substantive response to the topic of the discussion (the initial post) 
    Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 
     At least 400 words.
    At least three appropriate references APA 7th should be used. 
    The usage of “IA” is not approved and violates academic integrity.
    No plagiarism

  • “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education and Writing: A Critical Analysis”

    Instructions: Answer each of the 5 questions with brief essays between 300 and 500
    words in length for each essay (1500 – 2500 words total). Questions are worth 20 points
    each (100 points total). This exam becomes available on Tuesday, May 7th. It must be
    submitted to the drop box for the Final before Tuesday, May 14th at 11:59 PM. Use
    critical thinking in providing your answers and provide historical context for each of
    your answers. The exam is open book except that there is no book. You may use any
    resource including those provided on the Canvas site (articles, videos, transcripts of
    videos, optional readings) and anything from the library or other research sources. If
    you use brief quotes from a source, you must provide a proper citation and reference.
    Do not use extensive quotations. The only resource you cannot use is each other. The
    work you submit must be your own and except for cited quotations written in your
    own language. I will be using Turnitin software to detect plagiarism, so don’t plagiarize.
    Ever. Seriously. There are multiple questions within each question. Be sure to answer
    each of the questions for full credit. Submit the examination to the Final Exam in
    Assignments on Canvas before Tuesday, May 14th at 11:59 PM.
    Instructions for the Use of AI for Assignments: Technological advances now offer
    writing of essays, exam answers, and quiz answers by artificial intelligence. After careful
    consideration, the use of these programs will be allowed if these guidelines are
    followed

  • Title: The Growing Threat of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Attacks on the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction: The United States has long been considered one of the most powerful and secure nations in the world. However, in

    Please see attached photos. Form a portion of a research paper following the template provided. Base the research around the topic of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats to the U.S. Feel free to be creative with this.

  • Title: “The Importance of Financial Literacy Education for Young Adults”

    Argumentation Essay Requirements (please see full Argumentation essay Prompt/ Templet listed in this module)
    Your Argumentation Essay will be constructed using information from your Full Sentence Outline. It will contain a number of paragraphs. Each paragraph should be approximately 100 to 200 words. Your total word count should be no less than 1500 words and no more than 2000.
    Your essay will follow the order listed below:
    Introductory Paragraph
    Background Paragraph
    Body/Claim Introduction and Preview Paragraph.
    Claim #1 Paragraphs
    Claim #2 Paragraphs
    (IF NEEDED) Claim #3 Paragraphs
    Opposing View/ Refutation #1 Paragraph
    (IF NEEDED) Opposing View/ Refutation #2 Paragraph
    Conclusion Paragraph #1 “SUM UP”
    Conclusion Paragraph #2 “SO WHAT”
    and
    Works Cited (on a separate page)

  • Title: The Significance of Feeling Comfortable with One’s Name and Preferred Pronouns

    Why is it so important to feel comfortable with a name and/or preferred pronouns? Feel free to use examples from the webcomic or even personal examples to help support your argument. 
    Requirements:
    Your revised paper must be at least 1500 words and follow proper MLA formatting guidelines. It must be double spaced, 12 font, Times New Roman, with 1 inch margins, and with a Works Cited page. 
    You must use at least 2 outside sources within the essay. Remember to fully evaluate your sources in order to make an informed decision on whether or not they are strong academic sources. (ND Stevenson’s web comics do not count towards the required 2 sources)
    You must include an expanded thesis statement: Counter Argument + Argument + Reasons + Significance = Thesis
    You must include a counter argument paragraph. 
    You must submit the new typed essay along with the original graded draft (you can either type the original draft or take pictures of it), and one of the rough drafts that you bring to the peer review sessions. 

  • “Breaking the Blue Wall: Understanding and Addressing Sexual Harassment against Female Police Officers” Works Cited Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2016). Sexual Harassment and Assault Among Women in Law Enforcement. Retrieved from https://

    How does sexual harassment manifest against female police officers? 
    Outline:
    Introduction/Thesis: Women working in law enforcement are just as susceptible to sexual harassment in the workplace as any other profession with 71% of female officers having reported being sexually harassed. 
    Section 1: Defining Sexual Harassment 
    Section 2: Contextualizing Statistics Surrounding Sexual Harassment 
    Section 3: Sociocultural/Institutional Barriers 
    Section 4: Proposed Solutions/Efforts for Progress 
    Section 5: Conclusion
    please include a works cited page! 

  • Title: The Importance of Ethical Communication in Marketing: A Strategic Business Decision

    Our authors state, “Ethical communication is not just the right thing to do; it is also a smart business decision. Strategic writing builds productive relationships. Good ethics are a strong foundation for productive relationship that will stand the test of time.” What do the authors mean and does it apply to marketing communication? Please explain.

  • “Unraveling the Rationality of Speech: A Freudian, Lacanian, and Platonic Analysis of Hamlet, Ophelia, and Antigone”

    For this assignment, you will need to demonstrate your ability to apply the ideas in Freud, Plato, and Lacan to analyzing themes, ideas, characters, and actions in the “narrative” texts from the second half of the semester (Antigone, Hamlet, Fun Home, Between the World and Me)
    The successful paper will:
    Demonstrate a clear, sophisticated understanding of ideas developed in our analysis of Freud, Lacan, and Plato and be able to appropriately apply those ideas to an analysis of Antigone, Hamlet, Fun Home, and  Between the World and Me.
    Will accurately represent the positions/ideas/themes/actions presented in Antigone, Hamlet, Fun Home, and  Betweenthe World and Me.
    Will choose appropriate quotes from Antigone, Hamlet, Fun Home, and  Betweenthe World and Me and effectively integrate them into the student’s own argument regarding the topic.
    Will state and develop a thesis in response to one of the assigned topics.
    Topic:
    Crazy Talk. What makes a speech (or speech in general) seem rational? What makes it seem “irrational?” Hamlet, Ophelia, and Antigone all have moments when their speech is interpreted as lacking in sanity and/or rationality. Analyze these moments in both plays and explain what this can tell us about what are the marks of rationality in spoken worlds.