Analytic Essay. You need to write an analytic essay on autocratic, democratic, or technocratic
personality, institution, or culture.
Topic: Focus on one issue in your essay. There are obviously nine possible issues to choose for
your essay: Autocratic personality, democratic personality, technocratic personality; autocratic
institution, democratic institution, technocratic institution; autocratic culture, democratic culture,
technocratic culture.
Source: Read From Autocracy to Democracy to Technocracy: An Evolution of Human Polity
(https://www.cambridgescholars.com/from-autocracy-to-democracy-to-technocracy). If you write
on autocratic personality, you should read Part II completely so you can develop your ideas on it
for a good essay. If you write on democratic institutions, you need to read Part III carefully. If you
write on technocratic culture, you must read Part IV thoroughly.
Required Elements: Your essay must tackle these essential elements. For example, if you write on
technocratic personality, you need to address (1) what automatic personality is, its main
characteristics and behavioral symptoms; (2) what social factors and forces lie under autocratic
personality; (3) how autocratic personality molds political leaders, influences common citizens,
and shapes social atmospheres; and (4) how autocratic personality might penetrate in democracy
and even technocracy while dominating autocracy.
Length: You may write your analytic essay for as long as you like. The minimum is 10 pages.
Format: Font: Times New Roman; Point: 12; Spacing: Double; Margin: one inch on each side.
Submission: You need to submit your analytic essay through Turnitin at our class site on Canvas.
Essays showing a similarity rate of 15% or higher will be penalized with a deduction of 1.5 or
higher points. For example, an essay identified by Turnitin as having a similarity rate of 21% will
automatically lose 2.1 points. Essays showing a similarity rate of 50% or higher will be subject to
the double penalties provided by the class policy on plagiarism: (a) you lose all 14 points
partitioned to the essay assignment; and (b) you are penalized with a deduction of another 14 points
from your earned total score.
Author: admin
-
Title: The Evolution of Human Polity: An Analysis of Autocratic, Democratic, and Technocratic Personalities, Institutions, and Cultures
-
“Plato’s Critique of Celebrity Culture: A Comparison of Book 10 and Modern Society”
For my term paper, I am looking at Plato’s book 10. I’m writing about how, in book 10, Plato talks about creation and imitation; he says that artists and poets don’t possess true knowledge but imitate. In today’s age, people look up to celebrities and get their knowledge from them. I’m comparing Plato’s boo10 to how people look up to false idols . Please compare how Plato Book 10 relates to today’s age in how people look up to and praise celebrities. I am providing my book 10 notes. Please use my notes for the essay, and I will provide other sources to use on the relationship between people and celebrities.
this is also another source
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OTB0DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=How+does+Plato+differentiate+between+genuine+talent+and+empty+celebrity%3F&ots=5uuTjdxb3P&sig=R_CjDvU9Gy2L7AJSFVZDUHsDkT8#v=onepage&q&f=false -
Title: “Assessing the Risk of Respiratory Complications in Infants Born via Elective Cesarean Sections: A PICOT Analysis”
PICOT question: In infants born via elective cesarean sections, are those newborns at a higher risk of devloping respiratory complications within the first 48 hours of delivery when compared to infants delivered vaginally?
Attached is a ppt template of what information needs to be depicted in each slide, some information can go on the same slide. This template does not have to be used. Feel free to use any ppt design just as long as this information is on the slides.
8 slides or so needed not including the title and reference slide. On the last slide of the template is a poster that recaps all the information on each slides.
The powerpoint is mandatory as well as the poster slide which should be the last slide of the ppt before the reference slide.
be creative and use any powerpoint template that may catch the audience’s eyes.
Attached will also be some data from my current hospital on vaginal and c section births 38 weeks and greater and if those newborns needs any type of resuscitation or respiratory efforts. Please incorporate this data into the ppt as well. Use of pie chart or bar graph would be preferred for this data. -
“Analysis of Search and Seizure Issues in the Case of Michael v. Michelle: A Federal Law Perspective”
two-page paper analyzing the fact pattern presented below. Please use federal law or Florida law. Your analysis should include application of the topics covered during the past seven weeks. For example, search and seizure, search warrants, execution of warrants, exceptions to the warrant requirement, exclusionary rule, Miranda rights, and the right against self-incrimination. Do not restate the facts in your paper, but rather identify the issues, analyze, and provide your legal reasoning.
Ensure your citations are in APA or Bluebook format.
Please see the grading rubric, which will be used to grade this assignment.
Fact Pattern
Michael is a veteran police officer for the New York City Police Department. He is dispatched to investigate a robbery and possible homicide at 123 Apple Lane to Michelle Hansberry’s house. He knocks on the door in uniform and announces his identity and flashes a search warrant to Michelle. She does not ask to see or read the search warrant and lets Officer Michael in the house.
The warrant was issued by Judge Judy at the local district court. It is a search warrant that indicated the kitchen, family room, powder bathroom and common areas of the home could be searched for a gun used in connection with a murder in Time Square and for a diamond necklace missing from Tiffany’s jewelry store on Fifth Avenue.
While searching the premises indicated on the search warrant, Officer Michael detects a smell coming from the master bedroom, which is located on the first floor of the home. He steps by the entrance of the bedroom and determines based on his professional experience, it is the smell of gun powder. Due to this emanating smell, Officer Michael immediately goes into the bedroom and discovers a gun sitting on the dresser. Officer Michael grabbed the gun and placed it into an evidence bag and labeled it.
He then proceeds to open the dresser drawer and discovers the diamond necklace that was missing from Tiffany’s jewelry store. When Officer Michael questioned Michelle, she responded, “I did not kill anyone, my sister stole the necklace. I only agreed to hide the necklace for her.” Officer Michael asked Michelle to go to the police station to answer some questions, and she agreed. Upon arrival at the station and being booked in, Michelle told Officer Michael’s partner Scott, “my sister made me do it, I had no choice.” -
“Revisions and Final Steps for DBA Thesis Submission”
Dear Mohamed,
Sorry for my late getting back to you! I just finished examining this last version of your DBA thesis
I attach the revised manuscriipt with my comments and suggestions for changes
I was thinking when getting this version that we were close to submit it to the jury members after having invited them and set up the jury. Unfortunately, it is not the case. There is still work to do before the submission.
The main concerns turn around the lack of coherence and consistency throughout the manuscriipt and the weakness of the whole structure. For example, the Table of Contents does not correspond to the sections / subsections of the manuscriipt, moreover the titles and subtitles are not sufficiently distinguished (I have tried to bring something here by increasing the size of the policy for the titles of the main sections (Introduction, Literature review, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion); I also added subsections, for example, in the ‘Results’ section to better balance / organise the development and ease the reading. After the Summary, you have added a section under the title ‘Introduction’ that develops sometimes differently from the section that follows titled ‘Objectives of the study’! the key dimensions of your research. I provided you with a couple of comments here asking for clarification and suggesting to merge these two sections.
Pay a great attention to the level of coherence throughout the manuscriipt. For example, there are a lot of inconsistencies between the two already evoked sections (see the previous comment).
Finally, be sure that all references given in the final list of references correspond to all citations in the body of the manuscriipt. Similarly, those citations in the body of the text should be referenced in the final list. Double checking is needed here.
I would like to share with you my objective for the final phase of your DBA thesis.
I would like to organise the defence in September or October at the latest. I would mean that the next version of the manuscriipt should be the last one. It would imply at your level, to take into consideration the comments / suggestions and make the final decisions regarding the writing and the way you will improve the manuscriipt to reach a better level of quality.
I would ask you to send me the final revised version by the end of may at the latest. Don’t hesitate to ask your colleagues for help, reading and rereading the manuscriipt in order to identify and fix the eventual problems.
I will organise the jury, invite two internal (ISC) reviewers in June or July. They will have a couple of months to make the review and send their reports.
Let me know if such a view is fine with you and please feel free to get back to me in case of need.
All the best -
“Exploring the Differences and Similarities in Research Methods: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Articles”
Find one qualitative and one quantitative research article. Compare the difference and similarities between both articles (in terms of research methods).
-
“Breaking the Mold: Paul as a Scholarship Boy in Richard Rodriguez’s ‘Hunger of Memory’”
This assignment rests entirely with your ability to discuss Paul from the
vantage point of Rodriguez’s expanded Scholarship Boy model. You’ll
want to take into account as well how race/ethnicity, social class,
assimilation, and language work their ways into Paul’s plight, as he
attempts to escape his social position, similar to how Rodriguez
described in his own educational autobiography. And assume your
reader is familiar with the works in order to avoid unnecessary summary
in your body paragraphs. The focus, then, is the Scholarship Boy model
and how Paul represents it -
“The Burden of the American Presidency: An Analysis of Its Responsibilities and Growth” The American presidency is undoubtedly a daunting role, with immense responsibilities and expectations placed upon the individual in this position. The question of whether these responsibilities are too large for one
Are the responsibilities of the most powerful leader in the world, the American president, too large a job for one person? Why has the American presidency as an institution grown so large? Are there any powers you think should be taken away from the president? must be at least 100 words and no more then 300 words
-
“Exploring Ambiguity and Ambivalence in Mohsin Hamid’s “Exit West” In Mohsin Hamid’s “Exit West,” the author explores the complexities of human migration and the concept of home through the lens of magical realism.
Close Reading/Response Paper 3
Book:
Mohsin Hamid’s “Exit West”
Over the course of the semester, students are encouraged to write at least three close reading/response papers, three to four pages long, double-spaced, in which they examine a specific aspect to one of the texts discussed in this course.
Such aspects include analyses of narrative/literary devices (such as foreshadowing, juxtaposition, intertextuality), examination of symbols, settings, and characters, thematic analyses, and passage explications.
I want to offer you some freedom in terms of the questions you choose to pose of the text. You can interpret one of the themes of the text or trace the development of one of the author’s main messages. You could make an argument based on questions of representation in the text or you can probe the ambiguities and ambivalences with which he deals with some of the recurring concepts in the story.
I will mostly be looking at how you work with the text and use textual evidence to support your argument. So the best paper won’t be merely descriptive but will make a case or an argument for the position or interpretation they are taking.
Please give your essay a title.
Upload it as a PDF with a file name that includes your name (e.g.: JohnDoe_ConradPaper.pdf).
I’m available to discuss any ideas, doubts or brainstorming. I look forward to strategizing with you both on this paper as well as on ways of improving for future papers.
Most of all have fun with it!
Close Reading/Response Paper Guidelines:
• 3-4 double-spaced pages
• Provide a title for your essay
• Proofread, spell check, make sure your essay is free of errors and misspellings.
• Documentation: no footnotes necessary, as you will NOT be using secondary sources. However, if you do get ambitious and feel the urge to cite other sources, follow the below example and then include the work in a Works Cited page at the end of your essay. Any work cited in the edition that is listed on the syllabus does not need to be included in the Works Cited page. If you use a different editon you will need to list it under Works Cited. Please contact me with questions.
• Provide book title and line numbers for any passages you cite (Purple Hibiscus, Page#). After the first citation, an abbreviated title is sufficient (as in example immediately below).
Notice punctuation: hold the period until after the citation in parentheses.
Example: “The compound walls would crumble, I was sure, and squash the frangipane trees. The sky would cave in” (Hibiscus, 127).
I will be looking for the following:
• clear argument/thesis
• strong argumentation
• compelling interpretation
• use of textual evidence
• style, mechanics
• creative, critical engagement
Several suggestions:
1) use the specifics of the passage when possible.
2) avoid plot summaries and broad unsubstantiated claims; foreground your evidence instead.
3) make some attempt to give a sense of the complexities and evolution within the text of the issue(s) you raise.
4) be sure to discuss the significance of the issue(s) you raise to some central argument(s) of the work as a whole. -
Evaluation of Scholarly Articles: Comparing Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose for a Research Paper on the Topic of Mental Health Citation 1: Title: Mental Health and Social Media: Benefits, Risks,
Choose two scholarly/peer reviewed articles and evaluate them using the criteria (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose) .
After evaluating both articles, compare your results. Would both articles be suitable for use in a research paper about your specific topic? Is one article more helpful than the other in terms of currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose for your topic? Explain.
Your paper should be 500 to 1000 words in length (2 to 4 pages). Provide citation information for both articles. You will do a deeper dive into citations in the next module, but for now be sure to include any important information (title, author(s), publication date, publication name, and a link if possible) so that your mentor can locate the articles.]