Author: admin

  • New Ideas about Art and Art History From the assigned materials in the Instructional Content section of this module, I learned that art is not just about creating aesthetically pleasing objects, but it also serves as a way to express fundamental human

    Based on your assigned readings, viewing of videos, and studying of resources in the Instructional Content section of this module, complete the following discussion assignment.
    Prompt Guidelines
    Write a brief paragraph of 6-8 sentences discussing what new ideas/concepts you learned about art and art history from assigned materials in the Instructional Content section of this module. You may wish to emphasize your new understanding of “art” vs. “art history,” or describe the most interesting fact that you learned, or how the content of the resources helped you to begin to understand how art has been employed historically to express fundamental human ideals, values, and beliefs.
    Once you have completed your initial paragraph, reply in a brief paragraph to the discussion posts of two other students in the class. 
    Your initial discussion reply is worth 15 points. Your reply posts are worth 4 points each. Additional points are earned for writing mechanics and promptness. Your replies should add value to the discussion. Do not simply agree with what your classmate has said.
    Refer to the General Rubric/Evaluation Criteriafound in the Syllabus, as well as the specific assignment rubric attached to this assignment. To view the discussion rubric for this assignment, select the three dots at the upper right  of this page and then, choose “Show Rubric” from the dropdown menu.
    Advisory
    You will not be able to view any posts until you complete and post your initial reply.Research, write, organize, and word-process your initial reply post so that you can edit for grammar, spelling, and syntax. Then, simply copy and paste your reply post to the discussion board text box. 

  • Title: Leadership Approaches and Strategic Growth in Microsoft Corporation

    Individual
    Written Assignment – Coursework
    This task requires you to produce a plan in
    report format, on a public domain business 
    example Facebook, Tesla, Microsoft or any Fortune 500 Company,  addressing organizational leadership
    approaches covered across the course:
    1. Analyze at least two of the below stated leadership
    approaches covered in the course which are relevant to the selected business.
    (a)  
    Charismatic Leadership
    (b) 
    Ethical Leadership
    (c)  
    Strategic Leadership
    (d) 
    Cross-Cultural Leadership
    2.  You are required to evaluate
    relevant theories, principles, frameworks and models pertaining to at least two
    leadership approaches in your proposal.
    3.  You must demonstrate your
    understanding of the chosen concepts, and how they apply to the business in
    question. 4.  This could be a business
    you are directly connected with, for example as an employee, or it could be a
    company that you just have an interest in.
    5.  You should ensure you have
    access to information about the business, such as through its website and media
    exposure. 6.  In your response, you
    should also consider and recommend how the business could grow
    strategically, via effective organizational leadership.
    7.  You may integrate
    related elements such as motivation, entrepreneurship and strategic management
    concepts to complement your work.
    8. Reflect on the level
    of work ethics you have committed to search for the information required
    to complete this assignment.
    Guidelines
    for Individual Written Assignment Preparation
    1. Prepare an essay (report format) around 4,500 words (
    Excluding References & Table of Contents) within an acceptable variation of less
    than 1000 words above such a requirement. 2. A minimum of 20 journal
    article references is
    required for this assignment. Please ensure that citations for sources and
    bibliography are properly given in the test of your essay. You must use the Harvard
    referencing / citation style. The overall grading will take this into
    consideration. Submission
    Requirements for Individual Written Assignment Preparation
    1. Your assignment will be anonymously marked so you must
    not identify yourself other than by using your student number anywhere on,
    or within, the assignment. 2. Proper page break and heading for
    each question.
    3. Coursework must
    be submitted using point, font style (Times New Roman), font sizes (12), and
    one-and-a-half (1.5) line spaced. 4. You are advice to include page number of your work for
    each discussion question. Pages must be numbered consecutively throughout the
    text
    The required
    textbook(s) which are available online are:
    Main Reference:
    1. Yukl, G.
    2020. Leadership in organizations. Boston: Pearson. Additional
    References: 1.   
    The Leadership Quarterly
    2.   
    Leadership &
    Organizational Development Journal
    3.   
    Journal of Leadership Studies

  • “Exploring Evidence-Based Practice and Autism Support Interventions: Critical Analysis and Evaluation of ABA and FIP/CTM Approaches” “Exploring LEGO Therapy: A Critical Analysis of Its Effectiveness, Ethical Considerations, and Alignment with Practice Principles”

    Please remember to use non-medicalised language and identity first language. No ‘symptoms’, ‘deficits’, ‘abnormalities’, ‘dysfunction’, ‘ASD individuals’, ‘impairment’, ‘treatment’ and no ‘person with autism’.
    Instead use humanising and destigmatising language such as ‘autistic individuals’, ‘difficulties’, ‘autistic characteristics’, ‘autistic traits’, ‘autistic differences’, ‘autism support approaches’ ‘autism support interventions’ etc.
    Remember to describe then critically evaluate. Question studies then provide good, strong arguments that provide an answer to the questions you have presented using empirical research.
    Start off your analysis of each approach by sufficiently presenting and critiquing the seminal paper.
    Revisit your tasks on Myplace for inspiration and ideas.
    Make sure you follow good APA-7 referencing.
    If you cite the DSM-5 and ICD-11 remember to reference (APA-2013; WHO, 2022).
    All acronyms must be detailed in full in the first instance. There are a lot (e.g. RCT, SCD, EBP, TEACCH, ABA, PECS, II, etc). Write in full.
    Think carefully about the structure of the assignment. Does it flow nicely? Is it coherent?
    Think deeply about LO5 and your practice principles. It should not be purely narrative. Link it to a source of research for any key salient points that you want to highlight.
    Remember think about inclusivity and inclusive practice. Does any of the features of you approaches promote inclusive practice? Some of the features of your approaches may be exclusive (e.g. TEACCH is not suitable for people with visual difficulties or how need a free-flowing, unstructured environment).
    Plan outline:
    Introduction 
    Contextualise essay – what does it aim to do 
    Sate approaches that will be covered 
    Historical context of Evidence based practice (EBP) and autism support interventions (Week 1) 
    EBP definition- David Sackett  
    Practice based evidence 
    Cochrane collaboration – publishing systematic reviews within health care – autism included – before research was not as robust – using interventions that were not EBP. – only RCT – gold standard – controls many variables – claims are stronger (define RCT– excluded single case design (define Single case design) 
    RCT – costly – highly specialized researcher – not guaranteed results in real life settings (study from TAP 2 said interventions in natural settings are more effective? 
    Single case design can be good methodology to support heterogeniatlity of autism- implications? 
    Odom et al /Wong et al – Steinbrenner et al (2020) 
    Smith (2013) – categorization of CTM and FIP – criteria of each
    References: Odom, S. L., Boyd, B., Hall, L., & Hume, K. (2010). Evaluation of comprehensive treatment models for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 425-436. 
    Smith, T (2013). What is evidence based behaviour analysis? Behaviour Analyst, 36, 7-33  
    Wong et al (2014)
    Need to source othe references for unqiueness
    Assessment issues? – social nature – 2-3 issues backed by research 
    – how might profile of abilities impact validity or reliability of assessments 
    Environmental factors? 
    Good autism guidelines  
    Michelle Dawson video 
    Week 1 papers – Elizabeth boat 
    What are they focusing on? – decreasing autistic mannerisms?  
    Bolte, E.E. & Diehl, J.J. (2013). Measurement Tools and Target Symptoms/Skills Used to Assess Treatment Response for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord,43, 2491–2501.
    Add other references in
    ABA 
    What is it / aims 
    Authors  
    FIP/CTM? 
    Underpinning theoretical frameworks – specific dates of these frameworks – critically evaluate and in relation to autism profile 
    must cite Seminal paper – critically analyse – fidelity measures? 
    Assessment tools – support autism profile? Barriers? 
    Wider literature – strengths and weaknesses – efficacy studies?? 
    Ethics? Costs? Inclusive? Training? Practical implementation? 
    Practice principles – how do practioners impact results? – i would not use this in my own practice due to the principles not aligning with my core values – backed up with research
    references:
    Behavioral Treatment and Normal Educational and Intellectual
    Functioning in bung Autistic Children – Lovaas    1987
    Lovaas et al 1973
    Kupferstein 2018 – evidence of increased ptsd symptoms in autistics exposed to ABA
    – include other sources to strengthen or refute points made
    Lego therapy 
    What is it / aims 
    Authors  
    FIP/CTM? 
    Underpinning theoretical frameworks 
    must cite Seminal paper – critically analyse – fidelity measures? LeGoff 2004
    Assessment tools – support autism profile? Barriers? 
    Wider literature – strengths and weaknesses – follow up studies (2014 / 2018?) – efficacy studies?? 
    Ethics? Costs? Inclusive? Training? Practical implementation? 
    Practice principles – would i use this in my own practice – yes because i value these principles of the therapy – backed up with references 
    possible references:
    Andras, M. (2012). The value of LEGO Therapy in promoting social interaction in primary-aged children with autism. Good Autism Practice, p. 17.
    Hu, X., Zheng, Q., & Lee, G. T. (2018). Using Peer-Mediated LEGO® Play Intervention to Improve Social Interactions for Chinese Children with Autism in an Inclusive Setting. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48: 2444-2457.
    Lindsay, S., Hounsell, K. G., & Cassiani, C. (2017). A scoping review of the role of LEGO therapy for improving inclusion and social skills among children and youth with autism. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 173-182.
    LeGoff 2014 and 2018 as follow up comparisons
    Include between 40 – 50 references

  • Title: “Comparing Videos on Climate Change: Surprising Discoveries and Differences” In watching the three videos on climate change, I learned a lot of new information that I was not aware of prior to this module. Firstly, I was

    Submit a 2-paragraph comparison of the 3 videos and discuss the following:
    What you learned that you didn’t know prior to this module
    Information you were surprised by
    Description of how the videos differed in their information
    The last video should be a video THAT YOU FOUND.

  • “Assessing Effectiveness and Improving Strategic Planning for a Nonprofit Organization” “Strengthening and Sustaining Nonprofit Organizations: Recommendations for the Future”

    The Term Paper is a comprehensive semester-long project. Students will complete this project in the steps described below.  Your Term Paper is your major contribution, where you will exhibit your learning. Students will individually select a nonprofit organization, assess its effectiveness and make recommendations to improve its strategic plan through the approaches, principles and methods learning in the class.  You are free to choose an organization that you are familiar with, including an organization for which you have already worked.
    This paper will incorporate important concepts and frameworks introduced throughout the course and will demonstrate the students’ ability to understand and properly apply these concepts in real-life contexts.
    Parameters and guidelines for the term paper are as follows:
    Select a nonprofit organization for in-depth analysis. Please do not use material you have written from a previous course – this will likely increase your similarity score, which could become a plagiarism issue, as discussed below.  Please carefully review the section below on Turnitin & Plagiarism to avoid receiving a 0 grade for similarity. 
    The term paper should be at least 1,500 words. Please keep in mind that the word count requirements point out the minimum amount of effort that should be put into the paper. Word count isn’t everything because quality of writing and research matters as well, but it is an indication of the quantity of effort put into the assignment.  Note that word count does not include title, abstract, or reference pages.  Not following this requirement will significantly impact the grade.
    You should support your paper with at least 3 scholarly peer-reviewed references in addition to your eText for a minimum of 4 total references. Be sure to go to: https://berkeleycollege.libguides.com/scholarlysourcesLinks to an external site. to help you find references.  
    Use scholarly peer-reviewed references rather than websites. Scholarly references are generally more credible and make a more persuasive argument. Non-academic websites are not typically recommended for academic writing. While most of the information generally is correct, it is not always reliable because anyone can change the content, bias is often present, and it is not peer-reviewed. For example, it’s best not to use news websites, Wikipedia, investopedia.com, about.com, smallbusiness.chron.com, huffingtonpost.com, ehow.com, forbes.com, cnn.com, online encyclopedias, or similar non-academic websites. Articles in these types of websites are written by reporters or individuals who may or may not be experts in the field, and consequently may have incorrect or biased information.  Instead, it adds much more credibility to use the class eText, other related textbooks, and peer-reviewed articles, i.e. scholars have analyzed and evaluated the content for accuracy, quality, and reliability.  Be sure to use the university library to help you find these types of scholarly references.  The library has a setting in database searches that allow you to search for peer-reviewed articles only.
    It is acceptable to use a company website for research, say for example if you are researching Salvation Army, it’s ok to use www.salavationarmy.org to describe their mission, strategy, volunteerism, funding, etc.
    The Term Paper should be well organized and encompass the above subject and content guidelines, and an electronic copy of the project should be submitted via Turnitin.
    The Term Paper structure should be as follows:
    Background and Context: Discuss type of industry, products/services, and how organizational vision and strategies have influenced their history.
    Analysis: Review your eText and focus on 2-3 chapters that really interest you in regard to this organization, e.g. governance, executive leadership, developing strategy, managing staff and volunteers, marketing and communications, lobbying, fundraising, etc. Describe and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your organization in relation to these topics.  Be sure to utilize key nonprofit terms and principles learned in class and how they relate to the organization.
    Recommendations: Your recommendations for the next 1-2 years of the organization. How can they capitalize on their strengths and how can they improve in their weaknesses? Ensure that these align with the organization’s vision and values.
    Turnitin & Plagiarism
    Please note that your rough draft and final draft will be checked by Turnitin for similarity.  It is essential to use your own words, carefully paraphrase, minimize quoting, and fully review the plagiarism policy before submitting. For similarity higher than 15%, it is possible that your paper will receive a 0 if plagiarism has occurred.  
    Paraphrasing is recommended rather than quoting.  Here is a great source on how to paraphrase effectively: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/619/1/Links to an external site.   Please review each of the six steps and the examples to compare.   As you proofread your work, check each direct quote and determine if it is actually needed (almost always, it won’t be). If not, it is better and more credible to demonstrate that you have thought through the material by paraphrasing it.
    Work from previous Classes
    It is not allowed to use word-for-word research from previous classes.  Reusing substantial portions of your own work from a previous class is called self-plagiarism…
    Definition of self-plagiarism: The act of using part or all of an assignment you submitted in another course without permission from your current instructor or without citing your work correctly.
    Scenarios in which you may reuse prior course work:
    Scenario A: If you withdrew or received an F and are retaking the class you are allowed to reuse papers from that course. You must inform your instructor of your intent to reuse this paper before submitting.
    Scenario B: If you want to use a small portion of a paper from a prior course that you feel would aid in communicating information in this current course, you must secure permission from your instructor and cite your information according to the APA Style Guide. These requests are rarely approved, since each assignment is unique and designed to offer an opportunity for you to expand on your knowledge of the subject matter rather than recycle prior information.

  • Title: Analyzing Employee Resistance to Organizational Change: Lessons Learned from a Past Change Effort

    Reflect on an organizational change effort in the past that you are familiar with (this can be at an organization you researched or worked with) that experienced significant resistance from employees, and answer the following questions:
    Why did employees resist the change?
    What were the problematic issues that were not being effectively addressed, from the employees’ point of view?
    Were the underlying concerns legitimate?
    What could the leader have done to address the situation or prevent the concern from arising?
    How would this have changed the outcomes of the change effort?

  • “The Impact of Transparency on Public Procurement Projects in Somaliland: A Comprehensive Analysis”

    i need you to write research artice which i want to publish it later. the title is the effect of transparency on public procurement projects in somaliland

  • “Global Game: An In-Depth Analysis of an International Sports Team or Event”

    The
    project will be an in-depth analysis of an international sports team or
    sporting event from outside of the USA of your choice (with instructor
    approval). 
    *The
    first part of the assignment is a written analysis.  The written section will be completed and
    entered in Canvas for review by the dates listed below.  I will provide feedback and allow you to
    enter a final draft of the written section. 
    Feedback will include areas of the project that need further coverage,
    writing style and quality, and ideas to expand cultural and international
    issues involving your team or sport event. 
    The written report should cover
    sections
    A-G listed below.  At least three sources
    should be included (MLA or APA format). 
    Minimum page length is 5 pages.
    *Following
    the written report, you will develop your report using Powerpoint or similar
    software.     
    *You
    will need to gather information from several sources, including internet news
    reports, official team web pages, printed newspaper and magazine articles, and
    books.  Do not cite Wikipedia!  Make sure you have legitimate sources from
    several formats (not just team blogs and web pages).
    *Powerpoint
    slides (10-12 slides); you will need to post these materials on the drop box in
    Canvas by the due date (see schedule).
    *I
    will post the grading scale on Canvas so you will know exactly how the projects
    are graded.
    International team/sport report
    sections:
    A- Team/sport overview and history
    B- Fan report (take me inside the
    fan base, unique fan cultures or
    behaviors, rivalries,
    importance in community.)
    C- Economic Impact: Local
    communities, stadium situation, financial
    reports   
    D- Marketing:  Recent team marketing initiatives, promotions
    (tickets), public
    relations events
    E- Sponsorships:  Who are the team sponsors?  How are they
    activating the
    sponsorships?
    F- Web page/media:  Analyze
    the team web page and social media.  Any
    ideas
    for improvement?
    G- Other/Summary:  Review key points.  Discuss cultural issues as well as future
    challenges and
    opportunities on the field and off the field.

  • Title: “The Importance of Professionalism in the Workplace”

    Intro: what is professionalism and what does it mean.
    Body: what role does professionalism play in the workplace? What are the benefits of professionalism in the workplace?
    Conclusion: what is your opinion of professionalism 

  • “Advocating for Social Policy: A Summary of a Town Hall Meeting on Education Reform”

    The purpose of the policy event assignment is to increase knowledge of current policy issues,
    encourage involvement with advocates, and increase awareness of the policy arena. To be effective
    as an advocate, a social worker must be informed and engage with others advocating for social
    policy issues.
    The event must include a discussion of a specific policy proposal by decision- makers, stakeholders,
    interest groups, or constituents. Examples of events include town halls of a federal, state, or local
    legislator; school board meeting; city council meetings; an advocacy group meeting; or a policy
    education event.
    To complete this assignment, attend the policy event, engage with someone at the event, and
    complete a written summary of your experience. You will also discuss your experience during the
    Week 10 live session.
    Submit your 750- to 1,000-word narrative summary as a Word document, 12- point font and double-
    spaced, to the Online Campus. The narrative summary should be in paragraph format and address
    each of the questions below for full credit.
    Event Description
    • Who organized the event?
    • Who attended the event, including decision-maker(s)?
    Issue or Policy Description
    • What issue is the policy event addressing?
    • What information was provided at the event?
    • What alternative, counterargument/perspective was presented, if any? What are your
    impressions of the event?
    Engagement Description
    • What motivated the person you engaged with to get involved?
    • How did the person you engaged with learn about the organization holding the event?
    • What has the person you engaged with done in the past to advocate for this issue?
    To effectively meet assignment expectations, review the assignment grading rubric.
    When you save your assignment, the file name should be “First Name_Last Name_Assignment
    Name.”