Author: admin

  • Title: “Navigating Adolescent Development: Supporting a Teen’s Transition to Adulthood”

    Adolescent Development Scenario
    For this discussion, imagine that you are working with a 17-year-old adolescent and their family. They have come to see you because the teen is not attending school regularly and states that they intend to drop out because school is boring. They want to start working and be treated like an adult. Their parents state that they are willing to treat them like an adult if they prepare for their future appropriately and can demonstrate that they will be able to find a job they enjoy and earn enough income to support themselves. They are not sure what kind of career path they would like to follow and would consider vocational training. They also want to be around friends more, playing video games and hanging out at the local mall.
    Choose one of the following discussion prompts to respond to:
    As the counselor, what knowledge about social and cognitive development do you need to consider as you begin your work with this teen?
    How would you go about locating resources that would be helpful for the teen and family? Include in your post at least two resources from a local search in your region and at least two online resources that the teen could access to support their developmental growth process in adolescence.
    Choose one developmental theory and explain how that theory helps you understand this student’s behavior.
    What information might you share about this developmental period that would support both the student and parents?

  • Title: “Navigating Contemporary Theological Issues through the Lens of Olson and Smith: A Study on the Role of Scripture and Reflection in Shaping Christian Beliefs” Introduction The world of theology is constantly evolving, with new issues and debates emerging

    3. Research Paper
    Choose the topic of contemporary theological issues on the books by Olson or Smith with the
    articles recently in the library formatted by Turabian. Bible verses and reflections must be
    included.
    I have included the related chapter from the book; you should read it and write a research paper.

  • Annotated Reading of “Don’t Fear The Repeater”

    Read Don’t Fear The Repeater. (THIS ESSAY IS FOUND IN THE
    ATTACHED FILES OR PAGE 50 IF CHOOSE TO LOGIN INTO Perusall)
    Annotate it in Perusall (you will do so in Microsoft Word)
    or I will provide you with my login information, following the directions
    provided
    After reading the essay, respond to at least two of the
    following questions in your annotations.
    1.       
    What problems or issues does the
    author raise?
    2.       
    What data or evidence supports the
    ideas that the author communicates? Is it sufficient and compelling? If not,
    why not?
    3.       
    How does the author use language
    to engage the reader?
    4.       
    What does the author assume or
    take for granted?
    5.       
    What is the author’s purpose?
    Create 4-5 posts (annotations or questions), and respond to
    1 or 2 group-mates’ posts, for at least 5 fully
    formed annotations between the two readings.
    Simply you’ll be selecting 4-5 parts/sentneces in the essay and answering them as annotations. If you need clarification feel free to ask

  • “Exploring the Ethical Dilemmas of Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Bioethics Analysis of the Recent News Case”

    Write a 5 page paper analyzing a bioethics case from the recent news (published in the past 12 months). Could be about Assisted reproductive technology, abortion, commodification of the body, genetics( e.g., issue of parents being allowed to select for any genetic traits in their embryos), Assisted dying, health justice (eg., inequality for health insurance, should Medicaid cover fertility treatments like IVF). Pick one.
    General format of paper:
    4-5 pages double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, APA citation style. Must include reference for newspaper article or film/show, and must cite 3+ other sources throughout to support claims.
    Page 1- Give a summary of case from newspaper article or movie/show; presentation of central ethical issue; any important context (historical, political, legal, etc.)
    Page 2- Present an argument about one perspective on what is morally right in this case using specific moral principles and/or moral theories
    Page 3- Present a different, opposing position using specific moral principles and/or moral theories (note: include a clear transition like, “On the other hand,” or “Other people may argue that…”)
    Page 4- Reflect on your own position: what do you think is morally right, why do you think that way, what about your own identity or life experiences may have shaped your opinion, has your thinking changed, are there circumstances in which you might change your mind in the future, etc. (you do not need to answer all of those questions, but use them to form a clear analysis of your own position).
    Page 5 – Cite your references in APA style. Note, I do not expect the rest of the paper to be in APA, just in text citations and the reference list. You can use 1st person voice when giving your opinion as that is required for this paper.
    The goal of this paper is to explore a complex health issue from a bioethics lens, and apply any of the bioethics moral principles and ethical theories (e.g., autonomy, utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, Contractarianism, informed consent, beneficence, non-maleficence) to view this issue from opposing perspectives. No

  • Avoiding the Pitfalls of Expertise: How to Stay Humble and Continuously Grow in Your Field “Growing as a Leader: Embracing Humility and Continuous Learning” “Leadership and Self-Development: Cultivating Essential Skills for Success”

    Topic Overview
    Being an expert in your field may come with esteem and
    accolades from your colleagues. However, it can also set you up for failure if
    you’re relying on what you know instead of being willing to grow. Find out how
    to avoid the pitfalls here.
    The Expertise Trap
    Natasha won two awards for her marketing work on an
    international campaign for a new candy bar. When her organization was launching
    another sweet snack, they turned to her because of her success and expertise in
    the market. She was thrilled to lead the new campaign and knew her playbook for
    her past success would make this launch a slam dunk. 
    Months after the launch, the new snack campaign was falling
    flat with sales lower than estimated. She was dejected and couldn’t figure out
    what went wrong. But her teammates had a few ideas.
    Whenever they would suggest an adaptation, however, Natasha
    would dismiss it and stick to what she knew. She wouldn’t follow the market
    research which suggested the audience for the new product would be different
    than the past product. Plus, she didn’t listen to her colleagues in other
    countries to consider cultural differences. She believed her past success would
    easily translate, but she was fooled by her own expertise.
    The Problem with Know-how
    Sydney Finkelstein, a professor of
    management at Dartmouth College, calls Natasha’s type of overconfidence “the
    expertise trap.” It’s when a person’s deep knowledge and experience leave them
    incurious and vulnerable. 
    What
    happens when we fall into the expertise trap?
    a narrowing of
    our outlook
    a reluctance to admit
    mistakes or failings
    a distancing from those who
    aren’t at our expert level
    Falling into the expertise trap may stop us from growing, and make it harder
    for our colleagues to like or trust us, says Finklestein. And personally, our
    own expertise can leave us feeling unhappy, unsatisfied, and stuck, despite how
    hard we worked to obtain it. 
    9 Red
    Flags You’re in the Expertise Trap
    Did Natasha’s story give you a
    decidedly unpleasant feeling in your gut? Ask yourself if any of these
    statements ring true: 
    You’ve fallen into
    a creative rut.
    You feel old and
    out of touch with your job.
    You notice that
    others seem uncomfortable challenging your assumptions and ideas.
    You get surprised
    by developments in your field.
    You’re unfamiliar
    with new technologies or approaches.
    Your mindset is
    “because we’ve always done it that way.”
    You make decisions
    based on risk factors, not opportunities gained. 
    You propose the
    same strategies and tactics for new challenges.
    You focus on
    fixing old solutions versus pioneering new ones. 
    One way to get out
    of the expertise trap may be to think like a consultant, says Corey Phelps,
    dean and Fred E. Brown Chair, Michael F. Price College of Business,
    University of Oklahoma. Consultants must have an open mind to succeed. They
    don’t pay attention to political and financial issues within the companies
    that hire them or have vested interests in their recommendations. They
    challenge other people’s ideas, thoughts, and beliefs.
    Reflect: Think
    about the nine red flags. Did any of them feel familiar to you? How can you
    shift your thinking to consider new approaches to your old way of doing things?
    Show What You Know
    Top of Form
    Which
    of the following happens when you fall into the expertise trap, according to
    the text?
    Others may feel uncomfortable challenging your ideas.
    You may focus on fixing old solutions.
    You may feel unsatisfied in your work.
    all of the above
    Correct!
    Explanation:
    When you are in the expertise trap, many things might happen that stop you from
    growing and learning.
    Bottom of Form
    An Expert with a
    Beginner’s Mind
    It’s easy to believe that as an expert, you know everything
    you need to know and don’t have the time (or inclination) to learn anything
    new. After all, you are an expert. 
    However, the key to staying an expert is
    to be humble, keep an open mind, and continuously learn.
    Here are a few tips for doing just that from Dartmouth
    professor, Sydney Finkelstein:
    Check
    Your Ego
    Spotlight others’
    accomplishments instead of your own. Don’t take credit for every success.
    Listen to your team members instead of telling them what to do.
    Revisit Your Assumptions
    At the start of a
    new assignment, write down your assumptions about the project. Then go
    through and challenge each of them and decide which are valid and should be
    kept.
    Leave Your Ivory Tower
    It’s easy to think
    you don’t need to learn anything else, but that’s dangerous. Set aside time
    monthly to reflect on what you’ve learned from your teammates. Continuously
    ask them open-ended questions so they give you their thoughts and opinions.
    Encourage them to challenge your thinking and give you feedback.
    Learn from Newbies
    Create
    opportunities for junior colleagues to present on issues or topics they feel
    are important. This not only gives them an opportunity to become more engaged
    in their work, but it helps you learn new trends or technologies. 
    Diversify Your Roster
    When you surround
    yourself with people who think and act just like you do, it’s a sure sign you
    will fall into the expertise trap. Use a wide definition of diversity:
    ethnic, experiential, age, religious, departmental, and more. If you’re in
    research, why not ask someone from finance to lunch to learn more about what
    they do? You can also seek out new people at conferences or in your
    community. The key is to engage them, keep an open mind, and learn. 
    Challenge Yourself
    It can be scary to
    step outside your comfort zone and accept an assignment which is foreign to
    you. Learn to say “yes” and then throw away your established rules, try doing
    things differently, and take a few risks. 
    Learn from Mistakes
    Even experts make
    mistakes. Don’t downplay the ones you’ve made. Acknowledge them and learn
    from them. Think about what led to the mistake and how you can improve next
    time. 
    Take Note: How did
    Amazon and Netflix disrupt their industries and become dominant? Senior
    executives at traditional retailers relied too much on their expertise as
    merchandisers and assumed they would always be right.
    Show What You Know
    Top of Form
    True
    or False. In order to keep your status as an expert, it’s best not to accept
    assignments that can undercut your experience.
    True
    False
    Correct!
    Explanation: Although it can be scary to accept an assignment outside of
    your expertise, it will help you grow and learn.Bottom of Form
    Video: Growing in Every
    Type of Soil
    How does someone start four companies in four different
    fields and lead each one to success? Elon Musk, who has started companies in
    software, energy, automotive, and aerospace, says it’s because he’s always
    learning. 
    Michael Simmons, an author and entrepreneur, calls himself
    an expert-generalist, someone who has studied widely in different
    fields but understands the connection between them and applies the principles
    to their core speciality. Expert-generalists have an advantage because they can
    envision combinations, ideas, and strategies that those who only study one
    field may not be able to see. 
    Watch: Simon Sinek,
    author of Start with Why: How Great Leaders
    Inspire Everyone to Take Action,
    discusses how great leaders, regardless of their status, know that they are
    lifelong students.
    Need help with this
    video? Click Here
    Growing
    Your Skills in Every Field
    Perhaps you’re an expert at one thing,
    but would like to expand your reach. No matter where you are or what you’re
    doing, you can never go wrong with improving these skills that translate to
    every single field imaginable (even aerospace!):  
    Communication: Whether by email,
    phone, text, or group chat, we must communicate with others. Fine-tuning your
    empathy and understanding toward others will boost your communication skills.
    Listening: Many times
    when we become an expert, we forget to listen to others. And listening can
    sometimes be more important than talking. The next time you are having a
    conversation, stop and think about what the person said before you
    reply. 
    Self-Awareness: The best
    leaders continue to work on this so they can recognize their strengths and
    weaknesses. 
    Helpfulness: Learn to
    encourage others to share their thoughts and support them in their journeys
    toward success.  
    Creativity: Creativity
    is like a muscle. If you don’t keep using it, it will get weaker. Try to
    exercise your creativity by coming up with unique solutions to challenges.
    Take Action: One of the
    most important parts of learning is learning transfer which
    is taking what we learn in one context and applying it in another. Keith
    Holyoak, a UCLA professor of psychology, recommends people ask themselves the
    following two questions in order to hone their learning transfer skills:
    “What does this remind me of?” and “Why does it remind me of it?” This will
    help build the muscles in your brain that help you make connections across
    traditional boundaries.

  • Title: Annotated Reading of “The Cancer Journals” by Audre Lorde

    Read the Introduction, Chapter 1, Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 of the Cancer Journals by Audre Lorde.While reading, I want you to provide annotations each page.  I am going to send the attachments of these chapters in PDF form but I want you to convert it into Word so that you can highlight and annotate directly on the pages. I will send a sample of how I want the format to look like.

  • “Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: A Case Study Analysis and Solution” “Ethical Practice in Health Care: Analyzing a Case Study and Proposing Solutions”

    Assessment 3
    Applying Ethical Principles
    Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a paper of 3-5 pages.
    Collapse All
    Introduction
    Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
    Instructions
    Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
    For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
    Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF] resource.
    Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
    Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
    Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
    Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
    Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
    Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
    Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
    Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
    Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
    In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
    Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
    Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
    Assess the credibility of the information source.
    Assess the relevance of the information source.
    Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
    Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
    Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
    Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
    Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
    Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
    Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
    Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
    Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
    Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
    Describe the proposed solution.
    Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
    Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
    Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    Apply the principles of effective composition.
    Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
    Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
    Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
    Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
    Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
    Assessment 3 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
    Additional Requirements
    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
    Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
    Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
    Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
    References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
    APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
    Competencies Measured
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
    Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
    Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
    Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
    Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
    Discuss effective communication approaches the provider can use to address the issue in the case study.
    Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
    Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
    Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
    Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

  • Title: Job Costing and Predetermined Overhead Rates at White Company

    White Company has two departments, Cutting and Finishing. The company uses job-order costing and computes a predetermined overhead rate in each department. The Cutting Department bases its rate on machine-hours, and the Finishing Department bases its rate on direct labor-hours. At the beginning of the year, the company made the following estimates:
    Department
    CuttingFinishing
    Direct labor-hours7,60089,000
    Machine-hours58,3002,800
    Total fixed manufacturing overhead cost$ 370,000$ 512,000
    Variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour$ 3.000
    Variable manufacturing overhead per direct labor-hour0$4.75
    Required:
    Compute the predetermined overhead rate for each department.
    The job cost sheet for Job 203, which was started and completed during the year, showed the following: Department
    CuttingFinishing
    Direct labor-hours311
    Machine-hours815
    Direct materials$ 750$ 380
    Direct labor cost$ 66$ 242
    Using the predetermined overhead rates you computed in requirement (1), compute the total manufacturing cost assigned to Job 203.
    Would you expect substantially different amounts of overhead cost to be assigned to some jobs if the company used a plantwide predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor-hours, rather than using departmental rates?

  • “Contrasting Portrayals of Kurtz: A Comparison of Marlon Brando’s Apocalypse Now and Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness”

    What are the most significant differences and why between Marlon Brando’s portrayal Kurtz in Apocalypse Now and the character of Kurtz in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.

  • Title: “Where the Wild Things Are” by Maurice Sendak 1. Title: “Where the Wild Things Are” 2. Author: Maurice Sendak 3. Illustrator: Maurice Sendak 4. Publication date: 1963

    Select a picturebook to evaluate that is appropriate for children up to age eight. Use this form to provide the required information and answer each question in 2-3 sentences. Select any book of your choosing. Here is a link to a list of 100 classic children’s picturebooks compiled by the Scottsdale Public Library. http://www.scottsdalelibrary.org/youth/100-best-picturebooks
    Or, select one of the below books. Take the time to watch all of the videos to familiarize yourself with as many books as possible!