Brisk Essay Writers

Author: admin

  • “Assignment Instructions and Guidelines: Ensuring Success and Quality Work”

    hello, how are you?
    I wanted to say I attached the instruction  for you to follow all the instructions, add bullets to key points, add pictures as well. please make me proud. 
    thank you.

  • Title: Understanding Behavioral Contingencies and Behavior Shaping

    Please writr only 8 senteces summary on: B4 Define and provide examples of positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.  and B-13  Define and provide examples of rule-governed and contingency-shaped behavior. 

  • “Role of Artificial Intelligence and Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute SMA/IMA Occlusion and Bowel Ischemia: A Systematic Review”

    Please write a systematic review on role of AI and point of focus ultrasound in diagnosing acute sma or ima occlusion and bowel ischemia. Attached are the examples

  • “Environmental Challenges in Albania: A Comparative Analysis with Other Western Balkan Countries and Implications for the Future”

    argumentive essay, compare the environmental problems in Albania in relation to other countries of the Western Balkans, pros and cons, the future, etc.

  • Title: “Revolutionizing Healthcare with Nuance: Challenges and Strategies for Implementation at Future Hospital”

    Using Nuance, Generative AI in Healthcare with Nuance and Epic at Microsoft Inspire 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8YR243hbNA
    Questions
    What is an  Nuance product?
    What are the challenges of implementing an Nuance product?
    If you were to oversee the implementation of an Nuance product for Future Hospital, what initial steps would you take? What would a successful implementation consist of?

  • Literature Search and Evaluation Literature Search and Evaluation: A Systematic Review for Evidence-Based Nursing Practice “Collective Analysis of Three Primary Sources/Original Studies Related to a PICOT Question: A Critical Appraisal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research”

    This assignment will aide you in organizing your thoughts, and in collecting  research/studies which address your PICOT question. Your systematic review begins by strategically conducting a literature search, literature evaluation, and literature analysis.
    Submitting this assignment will aide you in addressing course outcomes:
    #1 – Evaluate the basic elements of the research process and models for employing evidence in clinical practice.
    #2 – Justify credible resources of evidence relevant to nursing practice.
    Link here Download herefor the Literature Search Strategy, CRAAP test, Evaluation of Literature assignment template. 
    There are four (4) graded portions to this assignment: 
    Literature search strategy
    CRAAP Test
    Evaluation of literature- summary & analysis  (table and APA 7th ed. summaries and analysis)
    Upload primary studies 
    Portion 1:  Literature search strategy 
    The literature search strategy portion is an organized method to help you find research studies applicable to your PICOT question.  The organization of key terms used to search will help you to retrieve accurate results.  Begin your search broadly, looking for as many studies as you can in as many databases as you can, then begin to narrow your search down by using inclusion and exclusion criteriaLinks to an external site., or boolean operators.Links to an external site. You will also narrow your focus with primary resources.  Your final systematic review paper should have ten (10) or more scholarly research studies utilized and referenced throughout your paper.
    Primary resources contain first-hand information, meaning that you are reading the author’s own account on a specific topic or event that s/he participated in. Examples of primary resources include scholarly research studies, books, and diaries. Primary sources such as research studies/original research often do not explain terminology and theoretical principles in detail.
    Secondary sources describe, summarize, or discuss information or details originally presented in another source; meaning the author, in most cases, did not participate in the research event. This type of source is written for a broad audience and will include definitions of discipline specific terms, history relating to the topic, significant theories and principles, and summaries of major studies/events as related to the topic. Use secondary sources to obtain an overview of a topic and/or identify primary resources.
    Answer all of the questions posed in the literature search. 
    Portion 2:  CRAAP Test 
    The CRAAP test is a method to evaluate the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose of the primary sources/original studies/research you find to address your PICOT question.
    Conduct a CRAAP Test on two (2) primary sources/original studies/research you retrieved during the literature search process.  Respond to the criteria questions found in the left column with full sentences in the right column before rating the research study.
    Portion 3:  Evaluation of literature- summary & analysis  (table and APA 7th ed. summaries and analysis)
    Restate your PICOT question
    Using APA 7th ed. format, type in the references for the three primary sources/original studies related to the same strategy from your PICOT question.  Following APA format (alphabetical, line spacing, indents, italics, doi, etc)  Use 3 primary sources/original studies not used in the CRAAP portion
    Using the three primary sources/original studies, complete the table (Study author’s/date-Study location, population & sample size-Type of study conducted/level of evidence-Identify strengths and weaknesses of the study-Identify the significance of the study ).  Full sentences are not required.
    Summary and analysis – in APA 7th ed. format (font, font size, line spacing), write out a summary for each primary source/original study/research in its own paragraph (1 paragraph for each primary sources/original studies/research). 
    In a fourth paragraph compare/analyze the three primary sources/original studies/research collectively for their similarities, strengths and weaknesses, for the meaning of the study/research findings as they relate to your PICOT question.  
    In this portion, you are breaking down the three primary source/original study/research related to the same strategy.  You may decide to use (or not) these primary source/original study/research in the writing of your systematic review analysis/evaluation of literature section (here you CAN NOT use meta-analysis, systematic reviews, or a review source).  Your summaries should provide an overview of what the primary source/original study/research was trying to examine:  the problem, the objective of the study/research, the sample size, the population, the study location, the methods, the assessment tool, and the findings. Make sure to cite APA 7th ed. format, the researchers name/date.  You should include information/data specific to the source, creating a ‘picture’ of the study.  
    Questions you want to consider when collectively analyzing the studies are:  What are the studies distinctive features as a group?  What is each hypothesis, similar? What previous research findings does this study build upon? Were the sample sizes similar? Were the data collection methods similar? Were the findings similar? What do you think is most important or effective regarding the research/arguments? What limitations do you see in the research or argument? That is, what counter-claims or arguments can you make in response to the study?  Can you cluster?
    Your Grove & Gray (2019) textbook, pages 338-344 addresses critical appraisal of quantitative studies.
    Your Grove  & Gray (2019) textbook, pages 357-362 addresses critical appraisal of qualitative studies.  
    Box 12.1 on p337 in your Grove & Gray (2019) textbook may aid you in completing the table identifying key principles for appraising. 
    Please review your textbook, Grove & Gray (2019), review pages 338-344 for the 3-steps in a critical appraisal of a quantitative study and pages 357 -362 for the 3-steps in a critical appraisal of a qualitative study.
    Portion 4:  Upload the primary studies
    Upload the three primary sources/original studies used in the evaluation of literature section to the assignment 
    https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/data-collection/
    Please review the rubric for grading of this assignment. 
    Submit by posted due date/time.  

  • Title: The Conic Section of a Satellite Orbit One real-life example of a conic section is the orbit of a satellite around a planet. According to NASA, the orbit of a satellite follows an elliptical path, which is a type

    Research ONE example of a conic section in real life.
    Tell us in your own words about your find. Do not just make this up off the top of your head. The St Louis Arch, for example, is NOT a parabola—it is an inverted catenary.
    To get credit for this Discussion, you must cite a source confirming that your example is, indeed, a conic and not some other more exotic curve.
    Using a personal example (My eyebrow) will not count unless you can cite a source verifying that eyebrows are parabolic.

  • Title: Understanding My Personality and Its Impact on Leadership

    assessment results:
    Openness: curious, original, intellectual, creative
    You scored high on openness (45 out of 50).
    You probably love to learn, are highly curious about things, and constantly ask questions. You like to shake things up and you prefer variety to routines. You’re open to change. Generally optimistic about new things, you may be the first one in your social circle to try a new food or clothing trend, or you may be the first person to initiate and champion new procedures at work.
    Conscientiousness: organized, achievement-oriented, dependable
    You scored high on conscientiousness (47 out of 50).
    You are most likely organized and persistent and tend to think about the future consequences of your actions. You’re a rule-follower, in general, and care about appearances and cleanliness. However, you may also be prone to perfectionism and have a tendency toward being a workaholic. Other people likely perceive you as goal-oriented and reliable but also as rigid or uptight.
    Extraversion: outgoing, talkative, sociable
    You scored high on extraversion (41 out of 50).
    You are probably often described as enthusiastic, passionate, and social. You likely have more positive emotions than negative ones and seek out fun and excitement. In social situations, you’re often the one starting conversations, and you’re more likely to speak up and be assertive or feel more comfortable giving presentations.
    Agreeableness: affable, tolerant, sensitive, trusting, kind
    You scored high on agreeableness (43 out of 50).
    You’re probably very polite, considerate, and willing to help. You generally see the good in others and have few enemies, and others probably describe you as very likable. You probably have a hard time saying “no” and your tendency to see the good in people may make you gullible at times.
    Neuroticism: anxious, irritable, temperamental, moody
    You scored low on neuroticism (15 out of 50).
    You’re more likely to focus on the positive things in life and take issues in stride. You not only help encourage others but can also help stabilize a group. You’re able to think calmly in stressful situations and you can probably think through a problem rationally or logically before reacting.
    assignment:
    Results Summary: Summarize your results of the personality assessment and how you think these elements might help or hinder you as a leader.
    Describe Results: Explain what elements of your personality assessment results surprised you, if any, and explain how accurate you felt the results were and why.
    Leadership Style: Pick two elements of your results and explain how they impact your leadership style.
    Importance of Leadership: Describe how leadership impacts organizations and why it is important to understand this impact.

  • Title: The Importance and Process of the Psychiatric Interview for Psychiatric Nurse Practitioners The psychiatric interview is an essential component of the psychiatric nurse practitioner’s role in providing comprehensive mental health care. It is a structured and systematic process of gathering

     
    Define psychiatric interview and its importance to the psychiatric nurse practitioner’s role.
    Compare the phases and critical tasks involved in performing the initial interview.
    Explain the on going process of the psychiatric assessment.
     Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.   

  • “Recording the Sale and Use of a Vehicle Warranty Program at an Automobile Dealership” Introduction: As an automobile dealership, it is important to accurately record and track the sale and use of vehicle warranty programs. These programs provide customers with added protection and

    Group 21- You are an automobile dealership; how would you record the sale and use of a vehicle warranty program?