SECOND PAPER
The Second Paper should be four to five pages long (double-spaced, Times New Roman, font-
size 12), plus the title page at the beginning and a Works Cited page at the end. This is a formal paper, in
place of a final exam. It is based on materials from our entire course, and especially the
assigned primary sources. Please build on / reuse relevant parts of your First and Second
Group Projects, the First Paper, and your in-class work with primary sources. Feel free to refer
(briefly) to course materials such as the textbook (Madigan), the Module Introductions, Lectures,
Reading Guides, etc., but keep your focus on what you can discover in the primary sources.
Your paper will answer all three parts of this Big Historical Question:
In what specific ways were Catholic experience and thinking in High Medieval cities and
urban schools very different from the kinds of Catholic life and ideas that were typical in
monasteries during the 12th century? And how were they also similar in some ways–what
new perspectives on the goodness of God, the cosmos, the human person, and secular
society did Catholics share in both monastic and urban settings, in contrast with Late
Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages? What historical causes related to political, social,
economic, ecclesiastical, and/or intellectual history might help explain your findings about
how monastic and urban Catholic experiences and cultures had changed in the High
Middle Ages, in contrast to what was more common in the earlier periods?
Focus your paper on examples and evidence related to the THEME assigned to your
small group (that is, monasticism, church leadership, love and gender, philosophers, the author’s
self portrayal, OR the human soul/body).
Base your answers to the Big Historical Question on the convincing analysis of these
SIX primary sources (the readings and translations assigned in our class):
– 1) St. Augustine’s Confessions (Late Antiquity, between 300AD and 500AD).
– 2) At least one textual document assigned in our Course and dating from the Early Middle
Ages (between 500AD and 1000AD: this could be St. Benedict’s “Rule,” Gregory the Great’s
Dialogues, St. John of Damascus, Rudolph’s “Life of St. Leoba,” etc.).
– 3) At least one High Medieval (1000-1300) Benedictine monastic source assigned in our
Course. You could write about St. Anselm; or you could write about St. Hildegard, Christina, or
St. Aelred—whichever author was assigned to your small group. Do not write on St. Francis of
Assisi for this part of the assignment, since Francis was not a Benedictine monk (he was a
Franciscan friar).
AND: These two High Medieval urban sources connected to Scholasticism (and
monasticism, since the authors were Benedictines at the time of writing):
– 4) Abelard’s Historia Calamitatum (1100s=12th century).
– 5) Heloise’s “First Letter” to Abelard (1100s=12th century). AND
– 6) At least one artwork dating from one or more of these same historical periods [from course
lectures, D2L pages, etc]: put this discussion of art in the paper wherever it fits chronologically.
Your paper should present and analyze evidence from these (at least six) different
primary sources in chronological order (in the order I gave you above). For each of these
sources, briefly explain its main themes and then: for each text, present strong evidence by
2
quoting and explaining at least one short passage (5 to 30 words long); for the work of art,
describe and draw historical inferences from at least two relevant details.
Optional, for extra credit: In addition, you may also quote and analyze a short passage from
an assigned source concerning Cluny, the Gregorian Reform, the Investiture Controversy, the
Crusades, or St. Francis. Make sure this passage fits in some way the Theme assigned to you and
your group and helps you support your main points in answer to the Assignment’s big Question.
[You can add half a page to your paper’s length if you do this.]
As part of your evidence from each primary source text, everyone must quote and
analyze the short passage assigned to your small group by Augustine in Group Project #1,
and at least one of the two assigned short passage options by Abelard that were provided to
your group for Group Project #2. Incorporate relevant elements from your first paper and
the two small group projects. If you wish, you may quote and analyze the passage by Gregory
that was assigned to your group, or you may select other passages by Gregory, or you can decide
to work on another Early Medieval author. Otherwise, it is up to you to select and analyze
primary sources assigned in our class that help you support your conclusions: write about sources
that you thoroughly understand and that contain strong evidence about the history of Catholic
experience on your assigned theme. You are also responsible for selecting and analyzing the
short passages (each one 30 words maximum) that convey the best and most reliable historical
information about how your theme was typically viewed in each historical period. You will base
your paper’s main points on the content of those short passages, so choose them well.
To brainstorm, make sure you can accurately summarize each short passage, look closely
at its context in the work it comes from, and do a word-by-word analysis of each word. Then, in
the paper, incorporate a comment on at least two significant words or phrases from each
quotation into your analysis of each short passage. Analyze several details from the work of art.
Base your historical conclusions on the content of the short passages and the artwork.
Compare and contrast the information in these (at least) SIX sources. What, very specifically,
do you think changed over time between Late Antiquity, the Early Middle Ages, and the High
Middle Ages? And: How do these sources reflect similarities and differences between monastic
and urban Catholicism in the High Middle Ages? Reflect also on why these various Catholic
cultures in different times and places were similar and different in these ways.
This is a formal paper. That means you should start with a short introduction that
presents the big issues and themes of the paper and identifies your (at least) SIX primary sources.
Then, in the body of the paper, present your evidence in well-structured paragraphs, organize
your primary sources in chronological order, quote and analyze your short passages, and
compare and contrast what you find so you can discuss what changed over time and how exactly
High Medieval urban and monastic Catholic experiences were similar and different. Finally,
write a strong conclusion that explores various options for why the Catholic experience was
different in monasteries and cities and why it changed over time.
Pay attention to organization, grammar, spelling, style, and word usage. Include short
parenthetical references for all your information,—include the short title or author of the
primary source, with page number, verse, or minute at the end of the relevant sentence. For
example:
“quote” (Confessions, p. 300). “quote” (Abelard, p. 300).
At the end of a sentence:… (Madigan, p. 300). … (Scott, “Introduction to Week 8, p. 5).
I have attached everything I believe you need please let me know if you need any more information, files or resources.
Author: admin
-
“Exploring the Evolution of High Medieval Catholic Experience and Thought in Monasteries and Urban Schools: A Comparative Analysis of Primary Sources” The Evolution of Catholic Experience: A Comparative Analysis of Monastic and Urban Catholicism in the High Middle Ages
-
Title: Understanding Addiction: Exploring Psychological Theories and Implications for Harm Reduction
In relation to any one substance or behaviour, critically evaluate how psychological theories can explain why some people develop an addiction to that substance or behaviour. what implications do those theories have for reducing the harm associated with such addiction?
-
Title: Division of Labor and its Impact on Production and Efficiency in the Economy
Activities
Learning
Resources – Chapters 1 and 2
i have uploaded the book to help.
you will also need to repsond to two different peers.
PLease separate discussion one and exercise one
Discussion 1
(im in the army by the way)
Identify and explain the division of labor as an individual within either your current or future career field. Think about how specialization works at your current or future job. How does specialization benefit your workplace? How does it work for them across our society?
Responses: Identify a similarity or difference between your peers’ arguments and your own.
Exercise 1
Chapter 1
Give the three reasons that explain why the division of labor increases an economy’s level of production.
Are households primarily buyers or sellers in the goods and services market? In the labor market?
Suppose you have a team of two workers: one is a baker and one is a chef. Explain why the kitchen can produce more meals in a given period of time if each worker specializes in what they do best than if each worker tries to do everything from appetizer to dessert.
Chapter 2
Could a nation be producing in a way that is allocatively efficient, but productively inefficient?
Individuals may not act in the rational, calculating way described by the economic model of decision making, measuring utility and costs at the margin, but can you make a case that they behave approximately that way?
What are diminishing marginal returns?
What assumptions about the economy must be true for the invisible hand to work? To what extent are those assumptions valid in the real world? -
Title: Culturally Competent Care: Reflection and Application
https://youtu.be/VrYmQDiunSc
Writing assignments can range from a reflection to a case study. For reflection, you will write a 2-page minimum paper (APA style) after watching pre-assigned videos that are relevant to culturally competent care, or care of individuals from diverse backgrounds (cultural/ linguistic context).
The paper must include the cover page, and the minimum length is 2 pages for the body (double-spaced). Must not contain a summary of the content. It should reflect how such topic was related to what we are learning during the course, how it resonates with your experience (if applicable), and how best to provide care based on the contents discussed in the video.
The paper will be submitted on Canvas Assignment/Turnitin. Submission must show Turnitin score of less than 25% to be accepted as an assignment submission. If plagiarism is detected (written by computer, app, etc) you will automatically get zero (0) for the assignment.
No late submission will be credited, and no partial credit will be given. -
Exploring Intersectionality: An Analysis of Anzaldua and Haraway’s Theories Intersectionality is a term that has gained significant attention in academic and social justice circles in recent years. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Cren
Write a discussion post of 300 words making sure to include at least 2 citations from the reading in ASA.
What is intersectionality? How does Anzaldua’s theory or Haraway’s theory exemplify the concept of intersectionality? -
Article Review: The Impact of Childhood Trauma on Adult Mental Health and Criminal Behavior
**Pick a peer-reviwed article rekated to a topic in Psychology**
Overview
Throughout this course, you will be working on a final project that involves summarizing and reviewing a peer-reviewed article related to a topic in forensic psychology.
Main Elements/Format
Reading the Article
Allow enough time to understand it.
Read the article without taking notes to gain an overall idea of its main idea.
Read the article again analytically highlighting important ideas and making brief notes of main ideas and main topic.
Writing the Article Review
Provide a synopsis of the article. Make sure to address these questions:
What is this article specifically addressing?
How does this article related to your selected topic?
Did the article contain research? Provide a summary of the research that was discussed, as applicable.
If applicable: What data was used? What instruments, if any, were used to collect data?
If applicable: What were some of the conclusions, if any, to the research in this article?
Your synopsis should end with a review and critique of your article. Make sure to address these questions:
What references did the author use in this article?
Was the article reliable and valid? Explain.
Was this article well-written? Thoughtful and reflective?
What were the limitations in this article? Any variables?
What other thoughts or comments do you have related to this article?
Your finalized article review should be at least 5 pages in length.
Deliverable Milestones
Milestone One: Submit Selected Topic and Article (Due in Module Two)
Submit your selected topic in forensic psychology, the citation information of your selected article (which must be related to your selected topic), and as a link to your article. Your selected article must be from a peer-reviewed, professional journal (Journal of Personality Assessment is an example of a peer-reviewed journal; Time, Newsweek, and Psychology Today are NOT peer-reviewed journals). Review this resource to find out more about what a peer-reviewed article is, this resource for information about how to determine if a journal is peer reviewed, and go to this site to learn about getting started with research at Shapiro Library. If you located your article through Shapiro Library, make sure to note where/how you found it as well.
This assignment is not graded, but you will receive formative feedback from your instructor on whether or not your topic and article are appropriate for this assignment. Instructor approval of your chosen article is necessary and critical to your success on your final project. Please note that you must receive your instructor’s approval of your selected article before continuing work on your final project. If your article is not approved by your instructor in this milestone, resubmit until you receive approval on a selected article.
“Milestone Two: Finalize and Submit Final Article Review (Due in Module Seven)
Finalize and submit your completed article review. Your article review should include all of the components described the “Writing the Article Review” section (under Main Elements/Format) of this document. Your article review will be graded using the rubric on the following pages.
Milestone Three: Review Classmates’ Article Reviews (Due in Module Eight)
Post your article review and read at least two of your classmates’ article reviews and provide comments on their reviews. Consider the elements in the rubric (at the end of this document) as well as the following questions when providing a review of your classmates’ work:
How well did they analyze their article?
Did they address all of the questions (in the “Writing the Article Review” section of this document) in their article review?
What new insights or ideas did you learn by reading their article reviews? -
“Providing Comprehensive Care and Support in Home Health Nursing: A Case Study Approach”
The objective of this assignment is to enable student nurses to comprehend and apply the essential skills and knowledge required for effective home health nursing, focusing on providing comprehensive care and support to patients within their homes.
Instructions
Part 1: Preparatory Research
Research and gather information on the principles and foundations of home health nursing, covering:
The role and responsibilities of a home health nurse.
Assessment techniques specific to home health settings.
Common health conditions encountered in home health nursing.
Strategies for patient education and family involvement in care.
Utilization of technology in home health care.
Explore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and communication in home health nursing, considering interactions with patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and community resources.
Part 2: Skills Application
Scenario: You are a home health nurse assigned to care for a patient discharged from the hospital with complex medical needs. Your task is to create a comprehensive care plan that ensures the patient’s safety, comfort, and recovery within their home environment.
Assignment Components:
Comprehensive Patient Assessment:
Conduct a detailed assessment of the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, social, and environmental factors.
Identify and prioritize the patient’s needs and potential challenges in the home setting.
Individualized Care Plan Development:
Develop a comprehensive care plan tailored to the patient’s specific needs, considering their diagnosis, medications, treatments, and any special requirements.
Outline strategies for promoting patient autonomy and self-care within the home.
Patient and Family Education:
Create educational materials or a plan to educate the patient and their family members about the patient’s condition, medications, self-care practices, and potential warning signs.
Highlight the importance of adherence to treatment plans and the role of the family in supporting the patient’s health goals.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Community Resources:
Identify and describe at least three healthcare professionals or disciplines that might collaborate in the patient’s care at home.
Research and list community resources or support services available to assist the patient and family in managing healthcare needs at home. -
Title: Exploring Temptation and Human Weakness in “The Screwtape Letters” by C.S. Lewis
Please read Part 2 of The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis (pp. 105-175)
Please use the attached discussion questions (click CEunit4act5qsSU24.doc CEunit4act5qsSU24.doc – Alternative Formats ) as a guide for your reading. Please answer any two questions in your post. Also, please discuss what you liked best about the book. -
Title: “Breaking Down Barriers to Voter Turnout: Strategies for Promoting Civic Engagement and Impacting Public Policies”
What are current barriers to voter turnout? What changes can be made to increase voter turnout? How will greater voter turnout affect our public policies? What laws could change?