Your final MoGA needs to be a PowerPoint submission. It must include working links, a dedicated title slide, a table of contents, introduction, body of work content slides, a conclusion, and work citations.
List ALL countries visited. You may use the work you have already submitted only reformatting it for Power Point is acceptable. Describe the music and its primary instruments from these countries. Describe the culture in terms of what religions are found there, are they animistic, what activities they do as a community. Describe the area in terms of terrain, landscape, weather, religions, and politics.
Write about where the people came from, if they were colonized, who were the oppressors. What foods do they eat? What resources were taken from them, when did they get their independence.
Lastly, what Music resonated with you on a personal level, and why.
PowerPoint slides will be at your discretion, however each item of instruction needs to be addressed, fully described and exhibited. Your PowerPoint must include working audio/visual links. All sources must be cited, including photographs, website′s, text, videos and audio examples.
Please make a check list of all the required instructions as you research and develop your outline for your project, and always double check you′ve covered everything from your checklist and my instructions before your submission.
*Please make sure your Hyperlinks work, check Google help, Adobe and reach out to IT to make sure they work and lead to the specific item when I click them. Best practice is to check with yourselves, classmates you can pair up with. You will have points deducted for non working material hyperlinks.
**Be sure you use terminolgy when decribing instruments, instrument families, terms of music eg: ″call & response″ ＝ ″antiphonla″. https://www.slideshare.net/sandramorgan16547/classification-of-instruments-revised-nov2013
Good luck,
Author: admin
-
“Musical and Cultural Exploration: A Journey Through Various Countries and Their Unique Sounds”
-
“Alphabet’s Integration and Globalization: Impact on Organizational Goals”
For this week’s assignment, you will write the fourth part of your strategic management research journal. You will evaluate Alphabet’s integration and globalization and its impact on the organization’s goals.
Write a 525- to 700-word response to the following prompts in your journal entry:
Identify Alphabet’s short-term and long-term goals.
Evaluate how mergers and acquisitions in the last 3 to 5 years have contributed to Alphabet’s performance and affected its organizational goals.
Determine the most critical merger or acquisition that has contributed to Alphabet’s performance and success in achieving organizational goals. Defend your choice.
Evaluate the effectiveness of Alphabet’s operational plan for global strategies (international, multi-domestic, global-standardization, or transnational). Include supporting research or data.
Format your references according to APA guidelines. -
Comparison of Nursing Specialties and Justification for Choosing a Specialty Title: Exploring Nursing Specialties: A Comparison of Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner and Family Nurse Practitioner and Justification for Choosing a Specialty.
Step 1: Comparison of Nursing Specialties
write 2-3 paragraphs comparing the nursing specialty you have selected – or the one you prefer if your choice is still under consideration – to your second preference. Identify each specialty and describe the focus and the role that graduates are prepared for. Identify any other differentiators you feel are significant, especially those that helped or may help you reach a decision.
Compare Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practioner vs. Family Nurse Practitioner.
Step 2: Justification of Nursing Specialty
Use the space below to write a paragraph identifying and justifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received from colleagues in this week’s Discussion Forum.
Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practioner- justifications for choosing this specialty: I have personal experiences that allow me to contribute to this field in a manner that will continue to move in a new direction
Step 3: Professional Organizations
Use the space below to identify and examine one professional organization related to your selected or preferred specialty. Explain how you can become a member of this organization.
Organization: American Psychiatric Nursing Association -
Title: Analyzing Data to Inform Strategic Decisions for Medical Office Buildings As a data analyst, one of my key responsibilities is to utilize statistical regression and time series analysis models to evaluate and analyze how multiple variables impact an organization. In this reflection
Competency 3 Statement
Utilizing statistical regression and time series analysis models, you will be able to evaluate and analyze how multiple variables impact an organization. You will also be able to create forecasts and interpret data to analyze performance as it impacts strategic planning and comparative advantage for an organization.
Manipulating data to create models helps us describe and summarize relationships between variables. Understanding how variables relate to each other helps businesses predict performance and make informed strategic plans. For example, to make an informed recommendation to management regarding which types of office buildings to acquire or sell, you would model the relationship between assessed value and given variables.
This reflection gives you an opportunity to develop, evaluate, and apply bivariate and multivariate linear regression models, and then reflect on office buildings you recommend acquiring and selling, and why.
Pre-Reflection Exercise
Download the Competency 3 Reflection Data Set. The data set is information about the tax assessment value assigned to medical office buildings in a city. The following is a list of the variables in the database:
Floor Area: square feet of floor space
Offices: number of offices in the building
Entrances: number of customer entrances
Age: age of the building (years)
Assessed Value: tax assessment value (thousands of dollars)
As you work through the following exercises, note your answers to the given questions so you can easily summarize them in your reflection.
Use the data set to construct a model that predicts the tax assessment value assigned to medical office buildings with specific characteristics.
1. Construct a scatter plot in Excel with Floor Area as the independent variable and Assessment Value as the dependent variable. Insert the bivariate linear regression equation and R2 in your graph.
Do you observe a linear relationship between the 2 variables?
2. Use Excels Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis of Floor Area and Assessment Value.
Is Floor Area a significant predictor of Assessment Value?
3. Construct a scatter plot in Excel with Age as the independent variable and Assessment Value as the dependent variable. Insert the bivariate linear regression equation and R2 in your graph.
Do you observe a linear relationship between the 2 variables?
4. Use Excels Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis of Age and Assessment Value.
Is Age a significant predictor of Assessment Value?
Construct a multiple regression model.
Use Excels Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis with Assessment Value as the dependent variable and Floor Area, Offices, Entrances, and Age as independent variables.
What is the overall fit R2? What is the adjusted R2?
Which predictors are considered significant if we work with α=0.05? Which predictors can be eliminated?
What is the final model if we only use Floor Area and Offices as predictors?
Suppose our final model is: Assessed Value = 115.9 + 0.26 x Floor Area + 78.34 x Offices.
What would be the assessed value of a medical office building with a floor area of 3500 sq. ft., 2 offices, that was built 15 years ago?
Is this assessed value consistent with what appears in the database?
Reflection
In a minimum of 500 words, reflect on the types of medical offices you would advise management to close and open, and why. Use your exercise notes to support your rationale. -
Title: Evaluating the Legitimacy of News Headlines
https://thecrashcourse.com/courses/who-can-you-tru… https://thecrashcourse.com/courses/evaluating-evid…
https://www.ted.com/talks/hannah_logue_how_to_spot_fake_news c.phpFind three different headlines online. One of them should be real factual news and you should explain how you know. The next one should be a hoax or legitimate fake news and you should explain how you know. The final one can be something that you thought was ambiguous at first but that you label as either legitimate or fake and you should be able to explain how you know. Be sure to share the headline (and link) for each of the examples.
Find two-three peers in your group and respond to their headlines. When you first read them what did you think in terms of their legitimacy? Were you surprised by the results your peers listed? -
Title: Understanding the Components of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
Instructions
Read the following:
Polit & Beck textbook, pp. 43–48 and Table 3.1 on p. 49
Read Advanced Practice Nursing Student (Link below)
Fill in the chart in this Word Document: Parts of an EBP (Word)
https://www-sciencedirect-com.regiscollege.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0260691718305276?via%3Dihub
Screenshots and chart attached. -
“Exploring the Bidirectional Relationship between Oral Health and Diabetes: A Comprehensive Analysis”
Please make the revisions as stated by the professor. He is looking for more consistency in in-text citations, and better sentence structure/word choice. he is also looking for a figure/ table that encompasses all gist of the paper (the bidirectional relationship btwn oral health and diabetes)
-
Title: Examining the Effectiveness of Mass Imprisonment as a Crime Reduction Strategy in the United States: Applying Sociological Criminological Theories, Punishment Philosophies, and Perspectives on Punishment from Prominent Sociologists
Is mass imprisonment of offenders a successful strategy in crime reduction in the United States?
If so, how does it work?
If not, suggest some alternatives to prison that may be more successful.
In your answer, describe and apply any TWO sociological criminological theories that were discussed in chapters 9, 10, 11, and 12 of our textbook.
In your answer, also describe and apply any TWO punishment philosophies that were discussed in chapter 23 of the textbook.
Lastly, in your answer incorporate the perspectives on punishment from TWO sociologists (Durkheim, Marx, Weber, Elias, Foucault, as described in chapter 23 of the textbook).
Use at least 1 scholarly source for this essay (in addition to any of the scholarly texts that are part of the course materials) and cite all resources correctly;
text book ( Newburn, Tim (2017, third edition). Criminology. New York: Routledge.) -
Title: “Mapping Out a Strategic Plan for Success”
This is only due for a part of an essay being the “strategic map” section and an explanation for it. Please use the map attached below.
-
Title: Analyzing the Rhetorical Method Used in [Artifact] and its Contribution to the Study of Communication/Rhetoric
Writing Mechanics
Proofread; clearly organized; clear and effective use of transitions; and written in a scholarly voice (i.e., author utilizes appropriate tone and language).
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
An introductory paragraph that: 1) orients the reader to your research question and suggests why it is important; 2) provides a description or brief overview of the artifact so that the reader becomes somewhat familiar with it and understands its social/cultural significance; 3) describes the rhetorical method you are using to analyze the artifact, which briefly summarizes the method and suggests why it is appropriate for answering the research question and analyzing the artifact; 4) makes a clear argumentative claim (thesis statement) that answers the research question; 5) provides a preview of your analytic findings and their implications for/contributions to the study of communication/rhetoric.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody
A report of the findings of the analysis that: 1) tells what has been discovered from an application of the method to the artifact; 2) provides an interpretation or discussion of what the analysis of the artifact means; 3) provides an evaluation of the artifact, where you assess or judge the degree to which the artifact is a model or meets the standards of rhetorical practice set forth by the selected method.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
A discussion of the contribution(s) made to the understanding of communication/rhetoric as a result of the analysis (i.e., answers the larger “so what?” question without overgeneralizing).
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch
Meets or exceeds minimum research requirements: uses a variety of credible sources; sources are relevant; non-scholarly sources are balanced with scholarly sources. Demonstrates an ability to synthesize and incorporate research: balances quotations, paraphrases, and summaries.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification
Makes a claim and uses data from the artifact to support this claim (answers the question: how does the artifact support your claim?).
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasonable Inferences
Demonstrates how you got from the data to your claim(s) (answer the question: why does the data mean your claim is legitimate?).
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence
Findings do not contradict one another; Nothing major from the artifact is left unexplained; Findings are clear and easy to follow (i.e., author uses consistent and accurate labels and language).
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
Title page, references page, and in-text parenthetical citations are included and formatted correctly in APA.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Creativity
Essay demonstrates an ability to think deeply, critically, and creatively about the artifact as well as course and research content.