For Assessment #2, you will create an annotated bibliography and summary based on your research related to best practices addressing a healthcare problem. You will choose a healthcare problem from the Assessment #2 Instructions faced by a healthcare organization that is of interest to you. Here are a few pointers as you develop Assessment #2:
Choose one problem to research from the Assessment #2 Instructions.
Utilize the Undergraduate Library Research Guide to locate at least four (4) references related to your topic that are 3-5 years old. The newer the publication date, the better 🙂
Review the APA tutorial, scoring guide, and Assessment #2 Example paper to help formulate your paper.
Though not required, I recommend completing the Self-Assessment on Credible Evidence. This assessment will help you with understanding what components make a particular article or research credible, and may help in the selection of your references during your literature search.
Create a 3-5 page annotated bibliography and summary based on your research related to best practices addressing a current health care problem or issue.
For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 4. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.
Select one of the health care problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]resource. Write a brief overview of the selected health care problem or issue. In your overview:
Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this health care issue or problem.
Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.
Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.
Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Author: admin
-
“Addressing a Healthcare Problem: An Annotated Bibliography and Summary of Best Practices” Title: “Enhancing Knowledge through Research: Main Points on [Topic]”
-
“Exploring the Clinical Applications and Implications of Enzymes, Thiamine, NSAIDs, and Atherosclerosis: A Biochemical Perspective”
Instructions
You must give detailed and well-explained answers to the assignment questions for each module. It is your responsibility to give clear, easy to understand and precise explanations in your answers – you must be very convincing with your answers! All assignment submissions should be consistent with the following;
Length of assignment – Not more than 2 pages The title and reference pages are excluded from the page count. No abstract is needed.
Format of assignment – AMA Number of citations – At least 3
Acceptable sources – Peer-reviewed Journal articles and textbooks Please write each Essay (1,2,3,4) on separate Word documents.
Essay 1: Clinical Uses of Enzymes
Using relevant and specific examples, describe the diagnostic and therapeutic uses of enzymes in medicine and clinical research. Your essay should not be more than 2 pages.
Reading Textbook chapters 2-4
Essay 2: Thiamine Metabolism Assignment
Based on your readings this week, write a 2-page essay on the significance of thiamine in human metabolism and medicine. Your essay must identify relevant thiamine-dependent enzymes, reactions and pathways as well as related disorders.
Reading Textbook chapters 5-7
Essay 3: NSAIDs Case Study Assignment
Using information gleaned from your readings on Eicosanoids, give a clear biochemical response to these questions (Your answers should not be more than 2 pages):
A 65 year old retired construction worker is referred to the dialysis clinic following a recent diagnosis of chronic kidney disease due to a prolonged use of of the NSAID Ibuprofen. Explain the biochemical basis of NSAID nephropathy?
What is the biochemical rationale for the use of low dose aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease? Why is Ibuprofen not a good substitute for aspirin in this case?
Reading Textbook chapters 14-16
Essay 4: Atherosclerosis Assignment
Based on your readings, write a 2-page essay on the biochemical basis and clinical implications of atherosclerosis. Your essay must be rich in molecular and mechanistic detail.
Reading Textbook chapters 17-19
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. -
Title: “Challenging Gendered Norms in Employment Law: An Analysis of Women’s Work and Shared Parental Leave”
I have attached the file with the question, please answer with the best work
These are the criterias I need met:
Shows clear evidence of wide and relevant
reading and an engagement with the conceptual
issues.
Develops a sophisticated and intelligent
argument.
Shows rigorous use and a confident
understanding of relevant source materials
Achieves an appropriate balance between factual
detail and key theoretical issues.
Provides evidence of original thinking.
· In essay questions, marks are awarded for your
ability to critically analyse an essay statement. The essay will provide you
with a statement. You should identify arguments in support of, and counter to,
that statement. Marks are awarded for development of an argument, including
understanding of the question and context of the question, a thesis and
structured testing of that thesis. The
question must always be answered but this need not be as a yes/no. Critical
analysis is key. Legal reasoning involves breaking down a practical or theoretical
problem.
· you are excpeted to be able to
critically evaluate legal arguments, assumptions and concepts. You should be able to evaluate
arguments in academic articles and explain your evaluation.
You should be able to evaluate legal judgments
and draw upon distinctions in judgments in your evaluation
After you have written it please send me a turnit
in’ report to check for any plagarism.
NO
plagarism please
P.S can you try your best to give me the highest
possible mark and i will give a good review and
possibly tip.
use the following books and articles
– Women and the law Book by Sandra Fredman; Oxford Scholarship Online Law, 1997 chapter 10
– Feminist judgments: rewritten employment discrimination opinions Book edited by Ann C. McGinley; Nicole Buonocore Porter 2020
– Domestic Workers, the ‘Family Worker’ Exemption from Minimum Wage, and Gendered Devaluation of Women’s Work in Industrial Law Journal Article by Natalie Sedacca
-Shared Parental Leave: Can Transferable Maternity Leave Ever Encourage Fathers to Care? in Industrial Law Journal Article by Gemma Mitchell 07/06/2022 -
Title: Hormonal Regulation: Understanding, Evaluating, and Managing Alterations
Discussion Prompts:
Understanding the Basics:
Briefly describe the hypothalamic-pituitary-axis (HPA) and its role in hormonal regulation.
Choose a specific hormone system (e.g., thyroid, reproductive, adrenal) and explain its function in the body.
Evaluating Alterations:
Discuss the signs and symptoms associated with common hormonal imbalances within your chosen system.
How do these imbalances manifest in different patient populations (e.g., age, gender)?
Diagnostic Measures:
Identify common diagnostic tests used to evaluate hormonal alterations (e.g., blood tests, imaging).
Explain the rationale behind these tests and how they aid in diagnosis.
Nursing Implications:
Describe potential nursing interventions for patients experiencing hormonal imbalances.
Consider both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies.
Discuss the importance of patient education and support in managing hormonal imbalances.
Additional Guidelines:
Share specific examples of hormonal disorders related to your chosen system.
Encourage peer discussion by posing follow-up questions to your classmates’ posts.
Integrate relevant resources like scholarly articles or credible online sources (https://www.endocrine.org/) to support your points.
Remember to cite your sources appropriately and maintain respectful language in your discussions.
Overall Objective:
Through active participation, gain a comprehensive understanding of hormonal regulation, its potential disruptions, and the role nurses play in evaluating and managing these alterations for optimal patient care. -
Title: The Impact of New York’s Gun Control Laws on Healthcare New York has some of the strictest gun control laws in the United States, with a focus on preventing gun violence and promoting public safety. These laws have a significant impact on
Briefly discuss your state’s laws (New York) regarding gun control and its impact on healthcare.
Include a minimum of 2 scholarly sources meaningfully to demonstrate much depth. -
Title: “Humor and Persuasion: A Reaction to the After Dinner Speech”
Write and submit a one-page, double-spaced reaction paper to the After Dinner Speech (a speech done with humor). The topic is controversial so think about where you watch it and who might be able to hear it without context. The context for the speech is an intercollegiate speech competitor delivering her nationally award-winning speech to a group of incoming speech students as an example. The audience knows that the speech is meant to be funny and controversial.
she uses persuasion to make her point and she uses humor in an
attempt to temper the topic. Consider the claims she makes, the evidence she provides (this speech is abit older so don’t be worried about it being older, it was very current at the time), think about the
impacts of her arguments. Do you find this compelling? Why or why not? Do you think she is thinking of
her audience? How does she use non-verbal communication? -
Title: “My Identity: A Digital Portrait”
digital film create a portrait of muself and my identity ? How do you identify yourself? How has your identity changed as you’ve moved from one country to another? How? Why? How much of your identity is something you have created yourself, and how much of it was created by others?Who are you, and what defines you?
Here are a few other questions you might like to address:
-How do your public and private self differ? Be specific. (This might be a good time to discuss your online persona vs private self)
-Has your identity changed over time? What things have not changed?
-Which aspects of your identity are connected to how other people have defined you, or things other people assurme about you? -
Title: A Critical Examination of Educational Plans: A SWOT Analysis of Two Countries’ Approaches to Education
Critically examine the article attached with the following rubric:
Introduction
Clear
conceptualization and identification of what an educational plan is through
its distinct characteristics (nature, purpose, principles, etc).
Summary
Demonstration
of skills to detect areas of clear differences in the plans. Placing the
issue in context/defining the problem.
SWOT Analysis
(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats)
Identification
of areas of strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the plans
through examination of the key issues with exploration and discussion of the
literature (i.e., breadth and depth of the examination of the literature)
Application to
education practice
Demonstration
of your competency and skills in identifying and discussing a plan relevant
to meet the countries’ needs using relevant data/scenarios/information -
Title: “Exploring Ethical Dilemmas and Persuasive Techniques in TED Talks: A Response to ‘The Ethical Dilemma of Self-Driving Cars’ by Patrick Lin” “The Power of Moral Reasoning: A Reflection on the Use of Ethical Appeals in Persuasion”
Instruction:
The Signature Assignment for this course combines all the concepts you have explored in this term. In this assignment, you will choose one of the TED Talks below and form a response based on the provided guidance. As you respond to the questions, you will be expected to connect the concepts covered in this course to the information in your chosen video.
Please choose ONE of the following TED Talks to respond to. TED. (2015, December 8). The ethical dilemma of self-driving cars / Patrick Lin [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixIoDYVfKA0Links to an external site.
TED. (2015, May 26). Cultivating collaboration: Don’t be so defensive! / Jim Tamm [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjSTNv4gyMMLinks to an external site.
TED. (2020, July 28). Ethical dilemma: The burger murders / George Siedel and Christine Ladwig [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8O131s31RgLinks to an external site.
TED. (2016, January 25). What makes a good life? Lessons from the longest study on happiness / Robert Waldinger [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KkKuTCFvzILinks to an external site..
For each number below, complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter of the class.
The Argument and Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated.Summarize the overall argument of the video in your own words. Be sure to include details and the main points the speaker used to make the argument.
Identify the three parts of the syllogism the speaker uses to make the overall argument:Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion
Testing the Syllogism: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated.Based upon the syllogism (your answer to Part 1. B), does this argument demonstrate inductive or deductive reasoning? Provide support for your choice. Be sure to only choose deductive OR inductive; you cannot choose both or neither.
If the argument is deductive, test your syllogism (your answers to Part 1. B) in terms of logical validity and soundness. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is valid and sound but also show how/how not or why/why not. If the argument is inductive, test your syllogism (your answers from Part 1. B) in terms of being a stronger or weaker inductive argument. Be sure to not only tell if the syllogism is stronger or weaker but also show how or why.
Rhetorical Appeals: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated.Identify examples of all three rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, and logos) that you noticed in this video and what information from the video has led you to your choices. Be sure to select specific words, phrases, or ideas and explain their connections to each type of appeal. Also, indicate what effect the use of these appeals has on the persuasiveness of the argument.
Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated.Identify at least one specific rhetorical device and one specific logical fallacy in the way this topic is presented. Be sure to define the rhetorical device and fallacy and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether you think the use of each device and fallacy was deliberate or not and assess the effect that each one has on the argument.
NOTE: Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos are rhetorical appeals, NOT devices, so they are not what is being asked here. This is asking about rhetorical devices.
Moral Reasoning: Complete a thoughtful and thorough paragraph long enough to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts indicated.Which specific kind of moral reasoning is demonstrated in your topic? Briefly elaborate on why you chose the one you did. Be sure to define the specific kind of moral reasoning you chose and demonstrate how or why the source employs them. Also, discuss whether the use of this kind of moral reasoning was deliberate and what effect it has on the persuasiveness of the argument.
Reaction and Reflection: Identify the most interesting takeaway that you got from this video. Reflect on how your application of the course concepts affect your understanding and reaction to the video and argument.
When completing this assignment, please keep the following in mind:
First and third person (I, we, her, him, they) are fine for this assignment, but do not use second person (you, your).
This is not a formal essay, but please:Include a title page, indicating which topic you chose.
Adhere to basic APA formatting, including:12-point Times New Roman font
Double-spaced text
1-inch margins throughout
Cite any outside sources that you used to support your ideas in proper APA format with in-text citations and references.
Be sure to review the associated rubric for more guidance on the content that your response is expected to contain. -
“Bráulio Bessa: A Poesia que Transforma”
Bráulio Bessa, nascido em 1986, é um poeta, escritor e palestrante brasileiro reconhecido por sua poesia de cordel e pelo seu trabalho como ativista cultural. Natural de Alto Santo, no interior do Ceará, Bráulio encontrou na poesia uma forma de expressar suas emoções e compartilhar histórias de vida.
Desde a infância, Bráulio teve contato com a literatura de cordel, uma forma tradicional de poesia popular nordestina. Inspirado por essa tradição, ele começou a escrever seus próprios versos ainda na adolescência. Seu talento para a poesia logo chamou a atenção e começou a se apresentar em eventos locais e festivais de poesia pelo Nordeste.
No entanto, foi através da internet que Bráulio ganhou notoriedade nacional. Em 2012, ele criou um canal no YouTube onde compartilhava seus poemas e mensagens inspiradoras. Sua forma única de declamar poesia, combinando a tradição do cordel com elementos contemporâneos, conquistou milhares de seguidores e fez com que suas palavras ecoassem por todo o país.
Além de sua carreira como poeta, Bráulio Bessa também se dedica ao ativismo cultural e social. Ele utiliza sua influência para promover a valorização da cultura nordestina e combater estereótipos e preconceitos. Por meio de palestras, livros e projetos sociais, ele busca inspirar e transformar vidas, mostrando o poder da poesia como instrumento de mudança.
Bráulio Bessa já lançou dois livros, “Poesia que Transforma” e “Poesia com Rapadura”, que foram sucesso de vendas e receberam elogios da crítica. Além disso, ele já se apresentou em diversos programas de televisão e eventos culturais, levando sua mensagem de amor, esperança e valorização da cultura nordestina para um público cada vez maior.
Com sua poesia autêntica e envolvente, Bráulio Bessa conquistou o coração de milhões de brasileiros e se tornou uma das vozes mais influentes da atualidade. Sua história de superação e sua mensagem de amor e respeito têm inspirado pessoas de todas as idades e provado que a poesia pode, de fato, transformar vidas.