text book link…….. Chapters 10 & 13 https://vk.com/doc8069473_366911053?hash=a5fc58f1d69c57f716&dl=901282a c4f3330f2c4… a thoughtful reflection papers that apply social psychology theories and concepts from the textbook to real world situations or events. Each reflection must cover the period that is specified on the schedule. For example, the reflections can detail social-psychology related phenomena from daily occurrences, news media, movies, fictional stories, politics, or historic events. Each reflection must be delivered as follows b. At least 2 very specific and clearly defined social psychology theories or concepts from the textbook. Also, each theory must be from a different day (2 points) c. A clear application of those 2 theories or concepts to some real word situation (1-point) d. Your reflective thoughts about the application of theory to the events (1 point)
Author: admin
-
Title: The Multi-Faceted Struggle for Liberty: Exploring the Meaning and Impact of the American Revolution
Please respond to the following essay prompt. Your answer
should draw upon lecture notes and course readings (both the three monographs that we read and the weekly primary and secondary source readings). You are NOT allowed to use any outside readings or websites. Please format your paper according to the normal guidelines for a history essay: double-spaced, 12pt. font, etc. You should cite any source that you use in your essay, but your citations can be informal (in-text or footnotes are fine). Please do NOT include a bibliography or works cited page. Your essay should be between
3-5 pages.
Question: Over the course of the semester, we’ve thought a lot about the struggle between liberty and tyranny. Most obviously, that struggle involved American colonists ultimately going to war against their king. But it also appeared in other contexts that greatly expand our understanding of the meaning and importance of the American Revolution. Slaves rebelled against their masters (in the colonies and elsewhere in the Atlantic), women made demands for equal rights, loyalist rebuked the Patriot cause, Native Americans sought to secure their autonomy by negotiating alliances and fighting wars, and the first generation of Americans questioned new governments and the actions of their leaders.
In the essay, I’d like for you discuss what these multiple, and at times, overlapping contests between liberty and tyranny tell us about the American Revolution. Who was it for? What did it mean? And was it radical?
Use the provided documents, as well as cite evidence from the following books: Thirteen Clocks by Robert G. Parkinson and Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution by Woody Holton. -
“The Hipster Bear Trainer and His Feline Friend” Once upon a time, in a bustling city filled with skyscrapers and trendy cafes, there lived a young man named Jack. He was a bear trainer, but not your typical one.
write a modern fractured fairytale based on the bear trainer and his cat, use the same framework but change the story to reflect a timeframe within the last 50 years. 1200 words.
-
Title: Financial Analysis and Profitability Assessment for a Business
this task is mostly about the complete finances of a business and at the very end of weather it will make money or lose money, it will need to have the complete books (P&l) show all materials needed. can provide more examples of what needs to be done.
I attached pictures of what more or less of what I’m looking for. -
“Debating the Social Construction of Reality and Power: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary Sociological Theories”
There are two questions for this exam, each listed below. You must answer both questions. Both essays
will be graded separately. There is a 1,000-word limit per essay (approx. 3 pages each [6 pages total for the
entire exam], Times New Roman, double spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins). Any materials submitted
past the 1,000-word limit will not be graded.
Be sure to cite any and all sources you use for your paper, including course lectures or texts. If you use any
outside materials, be sure to include a bibliography page. If you use only course materials there is no need
to submit a bibliography page. I consider plagiarism (any unattributed borrowing of another person’s words
or ideas) to be a very serious academic offense. Any plagiarism will result in an automatic “F” for the
exam, so make sure you cite all your sources for both paraphrasing and quotes and that your essays
represent your own original work.
Question #1:
According to a contemporary theory legend, in the summer of 1984, Edward Said, R.W. Connell, Peter
Berger & Thomas Luckmann all found themselves in Paris for separate conferences. After a long day of
theorizing about the nature of society, they all happened to converge on the exact same Parisian bar, “Le
Disneyland” owned by none other than Jean Baudrillard. Copious amounts of French wine were consumed
as the cohort of theorists discussed their own ideas on the social construction of reality into the early
morning hours…
Detail Berger & Luckmann’s phenomenological conception of the social construction of reality and then
consider how either Said, based on his concept of “Orientalism” or Connell’s theories on Masculinities
(you can chose which of the theorists passed out drunk in a corner and was not able to continue the
discussion) work as potential critiques to Berger & Luckmann’s general theory. As a conclusion, consider
how Baudrillard, still completely sober because he’s been the bartender, would critique all of their theories
on the social construction of reality with his conception of “hyper-reality.”
Question #2:
In a bid to gain greater symbolic capital amongst the intelligentsia, Tyra Banks has radically altered her
reality TV show “America’s Next Top Model,” into a significantly more popular edition, “Sociology’s
Next Top Theorist” where theorists compete for a cover shot and photo spread in the American Journal of
Sociology, taken by noted photographer, Nigel Barker, as well as a $500,000 MacArthur “Genius” Grant.
The final challenge is for the remaining theorists to explain their conception of how power works in
Society. You have been called in as a guest judge to cast the tie breaking vote between the finalists,
Herbert Marcuse, Michel Foucault & Judith Butler.
In your essay provide an account of this finale, summarizing Marcuse’s theories on advanced capitalism,
the “one-dimensional” society and the non-repressive society that would follow and then discuss the ways
that Foucault and Butler’s theories on power and its connection to sexuality would critique Marcuse’s
theory of Liberation in the Non-repressive society. Be sure to close your essay with a short paragraph
where you decide which conception appears to work best and you crown the winner of “Sociology’s Next
Top Theorist” cycle 1.
ALL THIS INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE ATTACHED FILE -
“Case Analysis: The Physiological Impact of End-Stage Kidney Disease on Glucose Regulation and Other Organ Systems” “Rubric for Evaluating Content and Information in Scientific Writing” “Ensuring Scientific Soundness: Evaluating Content and Organization in Academic Writing” “Exploring the Importance of Organization and Clarity in Academic Writing”
For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3 references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the paper:
Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a separate page. This will be page 2.
Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., “Abnormal Glucose Levels” for question 1).Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).
Maintain the order of questions when answering.
Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.
(NO AI PERMITTED) Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the rubric for complete grading criteria.
Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease
Cynthia, a 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room due to feeling constantly tired, hungry, thirsty, and with frequent urination. Her past medical history is significant for cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease. Physical examination had revealed yellowish discoloration to the skin, multiple bruises, bilateral edema, and weakness lasting more than three weeks. Laboratory tests were ordered (results provided below) after which she was prescribed metformin and informed to contact a doctor if she starts experiencing nausea, vomiting, fast breathing, and/or lethargy, as metformin has been known to cause metabolic acidosis.
Complete Blood Count (CBC)
Sodium126 mEq/L
Glucose220 mmol/L
Calcium7.1 mg/dl
Red blood cell count3.9 cells/ul
Iron40 mcg/dL
Albumin2.5 g/dl
Vitals
Blood pressure92/64 mmHg
Hormone Panel
ReninLow
ADHElevated
AldosteroneLow
Vitamins
Vit DLow
Vit KLow
Vit ELow
Vit ALow
Urine and Stool Sample
Stool colorGray
Stool contentIncrease fat content
Urine colorClear
Complete Blood Count (CBC)
GlucosePresent
Answer the following questions regarding Cynthia’s case:
What hormone is not functioning properly causing Cynthia’s glucose levels to be abnormal? Furthermore, explain in depth how this hormone regulates blood glucose levels.
What other hormone(s) are responsible for maintaining normal glucose levels? Explain in depth how they work.
Explain why Cynthia is presenting with excessive thirst (polydipsia), tiredness and hunger (polyphagia), and frequent urination (polyuria).
Explain why Cynthia is experiencing hypotension. How does the body and its various organ systems bring the blood pressure back towards homeostasis?
What do you expect Cynthia’s heart rate and end-diastolic volume (EDV) to be (elevated, normal, or low) and justify your expectation with cardiovascular formulas such as cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV).
What is the importance of iron in the body and the consequence of it being 40 mcg/dL?
Explain in detail what gluconeogenesis is and where in the body it occurs? Knowing that gluconeogenesis helps maintain blood glucose level, what is the effect of metformin on the management of diabetes mellitus type 2?
Looking at Cynthia’s albumin levels, what effect does it have on her (a) blood osmolarity (b) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and (c) urine volume?
Explain how glucose is normally reabsorbed by the kidneys? What is happening in Cynthia’s kidneys resulting in glucosuria and what effect does glucosuria have on her blood pressure?
If Cynthia ends up developing metabolic acidosis, what would the levels of her pH, CO2, and HCO3 be in the blood? Furthermore, how would the body compensate and address both renal and respiratory compensation (optional: show the compensation via a flow chart)? Rubric
PHYS 261 Signature Assignment Rubric
PHYS 261 Signature Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #1
5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches Expectations
Partially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #2
5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches Expectations
Partially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #3
5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches Expectations
Partially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #4
5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches Expectations
Partially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not address any portion of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #5
5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets Expectations
Addresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches Expectations
Partially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not address any portion of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #6
5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #7
5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #8
5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information may not be scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #9
5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #10
5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.
3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Assignment Requirements
5.6 to >4.76 ptsDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Presents coherently and logically organized ideas that are thoughtful and in-depth. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications.
4.76 to >4.03 ptsDemonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion generally serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic, but there may be some redundancy or unnecessary information. Ideas are mostly coherent and organized. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications.
4.03 to >3.3 ptsDemonstrates a vague or incorrect understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion do not add cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Several ideas are incoherent and disorganized. Meets some length requirements and addresses some aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and some meet the assignment specifications.
3.3 to >0 ptsDemonstrates little or no understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion are missing or insufficient. Meets few, if any, assignment and reference criteria.
5.6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Mechanics
8.4 to >7.14 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.14 to >6.05 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
6.05 to >4.96 ptsThe assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.
4.96 to >0 ptsNo attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
8.4 pts
Total Points: 70 -
Title: The Significance of Problem-Solving in Chemistry: Understanding the Importance of Method and Answer
Why is the ability to solve problems important in the study of chemistry? Why is it that the method used to attack a problem is as important as the answer to the problem itself?
-
“Understanding and Managing Hypertension” Slide 1: Title slide – Title: Understanding and Managing Hypertension – Presenter’s name – Date Slide 2: Introduction – Definition of hypertension – Prevalence and impact
Create a power point presentation with speaker notes (I will read the speaker notes you provide onto the power point)
You can pick the topic:
Type II Diabetes
Atherosclerosis
Hypertension
Depression
Urinary Tract Infection
I will tip 10% min upon completion and 20% min for excellent work