Assessment Description
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, using the attached APA Style template.
Reflect on the topic of GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Standards and in 250‐500 words address the following prompts in four paragraphs: 1. Review the Code of Conduct and Academic Standards in the university policy handbook. Go to https://www.gcu.edu/academics/academic-policies.php#h-university-policy-handbook and click on the University Policy Handbook link. Find the Code of Conduct and Academic Standards section. In your own words, explain one academic integrity violation, other than plagiarism, and one code of conduct violation. Give a specific example of what the two identified violations could be and describe why these standards are in place.
2. The academic integrity section discusses academic dishonesty. One area of dishonesty is plagiarism. Define plagiarism in your own words and explain why you think students plagiarize
3. Describe how students can avoid academic dishonesty in group work or as an individual?
4. How do you hold yourself and your peers accountable to the GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity standards?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
writing-center-style-apa-7th-edition-template-without-abstract.docx
via
Author: admin
-
Title: Reflecting on GCU Code of Conduct and Academic Standards
-
Title: “The World without NATO: A Counterfactual Analysis of the Global Landscape” Introduction The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been a cornerstone of international security and stability since its establishment in 1949. With its
Imagine a world without NATO. Prominent experts, such as Professor Paul Poast, suggest that counterfactual thinking is crucial for policy analysis and International Relations (IR) scholarship.
Question what might the global landscape look like without NATO’s presence, especially in the West. For instance, “If NATO weren’t here, what would happen?”
The counterfactual thinking analysis of up to 800 words should answer the question: What might the global landscape look like without NATO’s presence, especially in the West?
PLEASE ONLY USE SOURCES PROVIDED -
Title: Data Analysis of Selected Variable in MS Excel
1 MS Excel file
For the data analysis follow the following guideline:
1) Describe briefly the variable of your interest.
2) Provide a tabular summary of the given variable. (Use 8 classes to construct the frequency distribution)
3) Display a histogram on your data, and describe the information summarized by the histogram in a few sentences.
4) Describe the important measures of location, their possible relationship, and explain their meaning to the reader.
5) Describe the important measures of variability, and explain their meaning to the reader.
6) Describe the important measures of shape and explain their meaning to the reader, and (if possible) connect it to the measures of location and variability.
7) Compare the performance of the selected country (…) with your overall data on …
Add submission -
Annotated Bibliography for “The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health in Adolescents”
I have attached my proposal topic page to guide annotating the 15 sources I have sent.
If you want to add or replace any sources that better fit my proposal topic, be my guest! This top is significant to me, and I want the best sources I can get!
Thank you! -
“Ethical and Legal Considerations in Psychotherapy: A Case Study Analysis” “Compliance with Laws and Regulations in the Construction Industry” Compliance with Laws and Regulations in the Construction Industry The construction industry is subject to a wide range of laws, regulations, and codes at the federal, state, and local levels.
Overview
This Signature Assignment fulfills mastery for the Student/Program Learning Outcome: Ethics: Students will apply ethical and professional
decision making to issues in psychotherapy.
Be sure to review all rubric criteria prior to submitting your assignment.
Instructions
Step 1: Choose one of the two case studies provided in Blackboard and thoroughly review the paperwork provided for the one you have chosen.
You will write your paper on only ONE of these cases. ATTATCHED
Step 2: Start with writing a thorough case conceptualization of the case considering both the intake form as well as the case write-up.
● Do not summarize, rewrite, or paste any parts of these documents.
● Use the Case Conceptualization article provided in Blackboard to do this case conceptualization. You must follow the 5 Ps format detailed
in this article.
Step 3: There are many legal and ethical violations included in the case you just read. Find and identify at least 5 legal and 5 ethical violations in
this case.
● Make a table to distinguish between the legal and the ethical violations of this case. List the ethical violations in one column and the legal
violations in another column. Be sure to clearly identify which column is which.
Step 4: For each ethical violation you identified (at least 5), identify and reference which code from the code of ethics (specific to your state, from
Week 2) is being violated.
CALIFORNIA
Then, describe the actions or process the therapist must follow to comply with their ethical responsibility for each
violation.
Step 5: For each legal violation identified in the case (at least 5), provide a reference (you may use the textbooks and articles) that clearly outlines
the legal duty of mental health professionals in the state in which you wish to be licensed. Then, describe the actions or process the therapist
must follow to comply with their legal responsibility.
Step 6: Based on the same vignette, provide your answers to the following questions:
● Describe how you would assess for risk and screen for abuse.
● Imagine the client’s response to the assessment/screen and present two different statements they could have given that would trigger
your mandated reporting responsibility.
● What agency/to whom would you report?
● What process would you need to follow to ensure that you’ve met your legal and ethical obligations?
● What actions/interventions would you use to ensure that the therapeutic alliance is maintained after reporting?
● Write a 250-word progress note that thoroughly documents the process above.
○ Be sure to include the following:
■ Client’s statements and reactions
■ Session’s process (therapist’s tasks, interventions, and reporting process leading up to and after the report)
■ Factors you took into consideration in the decision-making process
■ How you would manage care after reporting
■ Resources provided to the client
Step
7: Lastly, reflect on the challenges you think you would face (emotional reactions and thought process) when treating the client. In this
section you can use the first-person voice. This section is included to allow you to self-reflect and develop self-awareness.
● Explore your biases, values, and beliefs as well as your possible self-of-therapist reactions.
● Then detail what you would do to cope with these feelings and manage your reactions and biases. Write about things that would work
for you.
The final deliverable must be 10-12 pages of content (not including cover page and reference page) in a
double-spaced paper, presented in a MS Word document or PDF format. Please use proper APA Standards formatting and citing/referencing (7th
edition), and use appropriate font, 12 size. Be sure to include a cover page and reference page. Submit your paper to the Turnitin Assignment
area in Blackboard no later than Sunday by midnight, and refer to the rubric for grading expectations. Be sure to cite ALL sources in the body of
your paper as well as on your reference page. You do need to cite all applicable laws/regulations/codes.
LOOK ATTATCHED PDF’s for ALL instructions and supporting documents. -
Title: Implementing Effective Management Strategies in the Workplace
Hello,
Please follow instructions in Module 5 attachment. Make your selection. If you select Option 1, I’ve attached the template for your use. Please use APA format, use at least three references. There were no professor improvement recommendations. -
Title: “A Critical Analysis of Local Ballot Measures in the San Francisco Voter Information Pamphlet for March 5, 2024”
Select 1 Local ballot measures detailed in the San Francisco Voter Information Pamphlet for March 5, 2024 (access link to PDF above)
In the analysis you are expected to critically explain the pros and cons of each ballot measure you have selected.
This cost-benefit analysis should include your close examination and explanation on of all political, economic and social, and cultural aspects that may have both a positive and/or negative impact on individuals and/or community.
Your analysis should also clearly explain your rationale; reasoning that clearly defines why or why you do not support the respective ballot measures you have selected.
Papers should include preemptive counter arguments from the base case from the opposing argument/side/point of view.
https://voterguide.sfelections.org/files/2024-01/March%205%2C%202024%20Voter%20Information%20Pamphlet%20English.pdf -
“Unleashing the Human Voice: A Thoughtful Exploration of Love”
I have an initial draft with the major points and arguments already laid out. I used an AI essay aid to help make better sense of my very abstract and disorganized first draft. I like the way the Ai aid made my argument easy to understand and how it elucidated a lot of my wordy ideas. Unfortunately, despite extensively editing the final product to make it sound more like my tone, the paper is still being flagged by Ai detectors. I would just need someone who can essentially rewrite the essay while keeping all the information, points, and ideas the same. My goal is for the new rewritten version to not be flagged for Ai use. It’s a thought paper that explores the question of what love is. No sources or additional information is needed, just rewriting what is already there to make it sound more human-sourced while keeping a similar level of depth and clarity.
-
The Key Issues and Principles in Paul’s Letters: A Dialogue on DPL’s Dictionary of Paul and His Letters
(Turabian citation)
For this week’s dialogue, please respond to the prompt stated below. A grading rubric for this assignment can be found in the “Grades and Progress” section of the main menu. Locate the assignment and click on “View Rubric.”
Select ONE of the articles below from DPL’s Dictionary of Paul’s Letters:
“Pastor, Paul as”
“Principalities and Powers”
“Old Testament in Paul”
“Legal System, Roman”
“Coworkers, Paul and his”
“Households and Household Codes”
And select ONE of the prompt questions below:
What is the specific issue that Paul addresses in Rome (chs. 14-15)? Be sure to include specific biblical references from different sections of Paul’s theological instruction in chapters 1-13 which support your understanding of the key issue of the letter.
Pick a single issue that Paul addresses in the Corinthian letters. Explain the problem by bringing out the first-century context within the passage, and then discuss Paul’s principle in addressing the issue.
Explain the theological relevance between “covenant,” “cross,” and “communion” (see ch. 7 in PTC).
(1) Select and read ONE of the assigned articles above from DPL’s Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. In two developed paragraphs (minimum of 250 words), present to the class the key truths and principles that you believe are most interesting or most helpful for the class to learn from the article that you read (so that we can learn collectively). At the end of these paragraphs, cite the article as a bibliographic entry (“article/chapter in an edited book”). No need for footnotes or references in this section.
(2) Choose and answer ONE of the prompt questions above based on your reading (cite your textbook or outside sources). Write at least two developed, cohesive paragraphs and incorporate specific detail, 3rd person, and support (minimum of 250 words). Cite your source(s) each time they are used. Include at least three scholarly sources (textbooks and/or outside scholarly sources). See the rubric requirements for grading guidelines.
For Replies, respond to two other students’ posts (100 word minimum each). EITHER read over the article the student wrote about and add insight or information which would help the class learn more specifically about the subject, OR respond to the student’s answer to the prompt question he or she selected (students do not have to agree with each other; avoid posts that only praise the author). Aim to add substantively to the discussion. -
Efficiently Completing Online Schooling Assignments “Maximizing Productivity: Completing 10 Online Schooling Assignments in 3 Hours a Day”
Try to get in at least 3 hours a day or 10 assignments done. This is a online schooling course through edgenuity. It’s can become time consuming, but goes by pretty quickly if you’re on it. I would like to get it done as soon as possible with out being suspicious. Everything has to be in your own words and do not get 100% on ever thing make it look realistic. I have other classes that also need to be done. Give me your best offer on this or if you have any other questions let me know. I have 10 other classes that also need completed so I can make you some money they have about 200 assignments or less in them.