Review your group members’ podcast recordings (their SoundCloud links) from the previous module in the discussion board. Then, post feedback to each of your peers by answering the following questions:
What is the purpose or central topic of this podcast? How clearly is it communicated?
How well does the interviewer maintain a conversational and natural style? Does she or he sound more like they are reading a list of questions/a script or having a conversation? How might she or he improve and be more spontaneous and conversational?
Describe the vocal quality of the interviewer. Does she or he display good vocal quality and variety? How could this person improve on vocal quality?
How well does the interviewer (not the guest) communicate or build her or his own ethos (community, values, and competence)? How does she or he present a self image that will be compelling to listeners? How could that self image be better communicated or improved to help the podcast accomplish its purpose?
What are the most and least compelling aspects of the introduction and conclusion? How well does the introduction draw the audience into the topic? How well does the conclusion summarize the key points from the interview? What could make the introduction or conclusion better?
Your feedback should:
Provide useful feedback that your peer can use to improve or enhance performance future online public communication. (33 points)
Reference specific events or segments of the recording by both their content and a timestamp (at least once per peer feedback post). For example, you might write something like, “I really liked the way you transitioned from your guest’s answer to the question about her education (at 1:37). I wonder if you could have done something similar when transitioning from the first to second question (at 0:45).” (33 points)
Follow the formatting as noted in the submission instructions below. (33 points)
i will post the links
Author: admin
-
Peer Feedback on Podcast Recordings
-
Title: Improving Interprofessional Collaboration: Reflection and Recommendations for Leadership and Colleagues
Using Kaltura, where you reflect on an interprofessional collaboration experience, proposing recommendations for how to improve interprofessional collaboration that can be shared with leadership and colleagues. Support these recommendations with references to the literature.
The interprofessional project that you reflect on may be one that you collaborated on at your current or former place of practice, or you may choose to imagine you collaborated on the interprofessional project presented in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF]resource and reflect on that.
Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:
Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
Explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes.
Explain aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.
Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.
Discuss the ways in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively.
Discuss the negative implications for the human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole.
Cite the literature for support.
Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.
Identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals.
Identify the strategy and its source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy.
Cite the literature for support.
Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author.
Identify at least one best practice or strategy for interdisciplinary collaboration to help the team achieve its goals and work more effectively together.
Identify the strategy, its source, and reasons why you think it will be effective.
Communicate in a professional manner, is easily audible, and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style.
The Example Kaltura Reflection will show you how to cite scholarly sources in the context of an oral presentation.
Notes:
If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact to request accommodations.
This assignment which I have to record Video.
Attached is the written Example. -
“Exploring Korean American History and the L.A. Uprisings: Reflections on Arirang, Sa-I-Gu, and KTown92”
Answer these questions in a narrative format.
12 pt font, Times New Roman, double spaced, 1 inch margins
Canvas will not process .pages or txt files. You will need to upload a Word doc or PDF. All students have access to Microsoft 365 at https://o365.fullcoll.edu/Links to an external site.
No need to repeat the questions in your answers
500 words, minimum.
Make an appointment with the FC Writing CenterLinks to an external site. to get help on your draft before submitting it.
1. Consider Arirang. What were Dosan’s and Dr. Rhee’s signature contributions to the movement for Korean liberation? Do you connect their work with other Asian Americans we have learned about in this class? How? What are 5 new things you learned from it?
2. Arirang Part 2 has several elders in it who make pointed references/critiques of media portrayals of the riots. What were they? And, what was one glaring omission in Part 2? (Also, did you recognize Ralph Ahn (1926-2022), son of Dosan, in it? He played Mr. Tran in New Girl.)
3. Consider Sa-I-Gu: from Korean Women’s Perspectives. What were 5 things that stood out to you about the testimonies featured?
4. What is your knowledge of the L.A. uprisings? How did you react to KTown92Links to an external site.? What are 5 things you learned from Grace Lee’s interactive film?
5. If you are part of the Korean American community, has your family talked about surviving the war and/or living through Sa-I-Gu? If you are not part of the Korean American community, ask your elders & family members what their memories are of the 1992 events surrounding Rodney King and the Los Angeles K-Town riots and report on your findings. NB: This made global and national news for over a year. Southern Californians from all backgrounds were impacted by it. -
“The Fuchu Prison in Japan: A Critical Analysis of its Geographical Location, History, and Impact on Japanese Prison Culture”
The paper is about the fuchu prison in japan.
There is no need for an introduction, as someone else is doing it.
I only need these specific parts:
2 Geographical location of the prison……………………………………………………..
2.1 Physical and architectural features
2.2 History and development of the prison
2.3 Critical Analysis of Japanese Prison Culture
(The social and cultural norms that influence the Japanese prison system; Comparison with other prison models in the world
Former prisoners’ perspectives (maybe France) ; ex. Testimonies and stories from former inmates of Fuchu prison
Impact of incarceration on individual and collective perception
In total it has to have less or around 1000 words (as it is only one part of the whole paper) -
Executive Summary: Compliance Status and Corrective Action Plan for Infection Control at XYZ Hospital Introduction: The purpose of this executive summary is to provide senior leadership at XYZ Hospital with an overview of the current compliance status of the organization in regards to infection
Please read the AFT2_ task_ document first_
Create an executive summary for senior leadership outlining the current compliance status of the organization based on the attached Accreditation Audit Case Study – Task 1 Artifacts for one priority focus area of the Joint Commission standards (e.g., infection control, communication, medical management, information management).
1. Develop a corrective action plan that would ensure compliance with the Joint Commission standards for the identified area.
2. Justify why the review area that you selected is important to the hospital.
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission -
“Discovering My Path: My Personal Statement for UCAS Applications” As I sit down to write this personal statement for my UCAS applications, I am filled with a mixture of excitement and nerves. Excitement for the endless possibilities that await
i want a personal statement for my UCAS applications
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc) -
“The Power of Perseverance: An Interview with a Resilient Individual” Introduction: In a world filled with challenges and obstacles, it takes a special kind of person to rise above them and emerge stronger. One such person is [
Please follow the picture for information you can write and change the quote based on the one that you have to use. You can change it for what you see fit but only use the source least. You can add other details about the person I interviewed that makes sense about her in the interview.
-
Title: The Social Construction of Gender: Examining Biological and Social Influences
Read the article The ‘Pink vs Blue’ Gender Mythand watch the video Gender Identity. After reviewing these resources regarding what it means that gender is a social construct, address the following questions: What does it mean when sociologists argue that gender is socially constructed? What is an example of a difference in men and women’s behavior that you feel is rooted in biology rather than socially social constructed? Be sure to provide evidence from this week’s readings and/or external research to support your argument that this behavior is rooted in biology and is not socially constructed. Which example from the resources provided did you find most compelling in building your knowledge of social construction? Summarize the example and explain why you found it most useful.
-
“Contemporary Challenges Shaping Policing Priorities in Victoria, Australia: A Critical Analysis of Police Accountability and Use of Force”
Assignment details
This essay is designed to develop your critical thinking and analysis skills relevant to your discipline. You will select two of the policing topics to research and analyse. Your analysis should include the materials you have covered in this unit, as well as evidence of further research of the literature.
This assignment supports unit learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Using a minimum of ten (10) scholarly sources, you are required to produce a 2000-word essay based on the following brief:
Critically discuss two contemporary challenges that shape policing priorities in your state of residence. The state of residence is Victoria Australia.
Your essay must critically address two (2) of the following topics:
Police accountability and standards
Police use of force
Policing diverse communities
Plural policing
Transnational policing
Police visibility
Evidence-based policing.
Research
You will need to undertake extensive scholarly research of the topics, including consideration of relevant theories in criminology. References may be academic books, professional journal articles, or book chapters. References may be obtained from the internet as long as they are from professional sources and are cited appropriately using APA 7 style. Do not use unreferenced material from the internet or generative AI (artificial intelligence) writing tools.
For you to consider:
Take the time to plan properly. 2000 words is a substantial piece of writing but breaking it up into its components is less complicated than you might think.
Back up your claims with research. This means not only making a claim and but also supporting that claim with evidence (i.e. references to scholarly sources). Good essays are well supported by research. Aim to include two or three references in each paragraph in the body of your essay.
Start writing early. A 2000-word essay takes time and you may find that your approach changes as you conduct your research.
Use appropriate sources, particularly peer-reviewed articles and books. You may use other sources to provide supporting information (e.g. the ABS or BOCSAR sites for crime statistics). Include at least ten references in your research essay. This is a minimum requirement—higher grades will likely have more than this.
Do not use non-scholarly sources e.g. random websites or Wikipedia. Also remember that this is a research essay—we want to see how well you can find your information. This means we want to see referencing beyond the resources we have given to you (i.e. your essential readings).
Discuss your essay plan and any potential problematic issues with your eLA. They can provide specific advice about your chosen topic and advise you on the best approaches to take.