Title: “The Case for Moral Relativism: An Examination of Gilbert Harman’s Argument”

In this article 
Actions
(read p.519-526 middle) Gilbert Harman makes a case for moral relativism.   Your task is to present, explain, and evaluate Harman’s argument.   More specifically, formulate a formally valid version of Harman’s main argument in the beginning of your paper.  Once you have done so, explain each premise of the argument.  Provide textual support where appropriate.   After presenting and explaining the argument, critically evaluate it.  You are required to raise a serious objection to at least one premise, and I want to see a creative example of your own to support the point you raise in the objection. (attched is also a shorter exsample of what is expected as well as the reading)